Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business — Based in Emeryville, California, and incorporated in Delaware in 2014, Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (together with its wholly owned subsidiaries, collectively, "Grocery Outlet," "we," or the "Company") is a growth-oriented, extreme value retailer of quality, name-brand consumables and fresh products sold primarily through a network of independently operated stores. As of July 4, 2026, we had 547 stores throughout California, Washington, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Nevada, Idaho, Maryland, North Carolina, Ohio, Virginia, Georgia, New Jersey, Alabama, Delaware and Kentucky.
Fiscal Year and Quarters — We operate on a fiscal year that ends on the Saturday closest to December 31st each year. The fiscal years ending January 2, 2027 ("fiscal 2026") and ended January 3, 2026 ("fiscal 2025") consist of 52 weeks and 53 weeks, respectively. References to the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and the second quarter of fiscal 2025 refer to the 13 weeks ended July 4, 2026 and June 28, 2025, respectively. References to the first half of fiscal 2026 and the first half of fiscal 2025 refer to the 26 weeks ended July 4, 2026 and June 28, 2025, respectively.
Basis of Presentation — The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and the applicable rules and regulations of the United States ("U.S.") Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") for interim reporting. Certain information and note disclosures included in our annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for fiscal 2025 (the "2025 Form 10-K"). The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 3, 2026 included herein has been derived from those audited consolidated financial statements.
Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions were eliminated. In the opinion of management, these condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. The interim results of operations and cash flows are not necessarily indicative of those results and cash flows expected for any future interim or annual period. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.
Use of Estimates — The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results can differ from these estimates depending upon certain risks and uncertainties. Changes in these estimates are recorded when known. We consider our accounting policies relating to long-lived asset impairment and goodwill impairment to be significant accounting policies that involve management's estimates and judgments.
Merchandise Inventories — Merchandise inventories are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is primarily determined by the weighted-average cost method for warehouse inventories and the retail inventory method for store inventories. We provide for estimated inventory losses between physical inventory counts based on historical averages. This provision is adjusted periodically to reflect the actual shrink results of the physical inventory counts.
Leases — We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use assets, current lease liabilities, and long-term lease liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Finance leases are included in other assets, current lease liabilities, and long-term lease liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Right-of-use assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease over the same term. Right-of-use assets and liabilities are recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of the lease payments over the lease term, reduced by landlord incentives. As most of our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate, which is estimated to approximate the interest rate on a collateralized basis with similar terms and payments based on the information available at the commencement date, to determine the present value of our lease payments. Lease term is defined as the non-cancelable period of the lease plus any options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the option. Lease expense for operating lease payments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term while finance lease payments are charged to interest expense and depreciation and amortization expense over the lease term. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet; lease expense for these short-term leases is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
We generally lease retail facilities for store locations, distribution centers, office space and equipment and account for these leases as operating leases. We account for certain equipment leases as finance leases. Lease and non-lease components are accounted for separately. We sublease certain real estate to unrelated third parties under non-cancelable leases and the sublease portfolio consists of operating leases for retail stores.
Goodwill — We have goodwill recorded on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. Goodwill represents the difference between the purchase price and the fair value of assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized, but rather is subject to an annual impairment evaluation which is performed during our fourth quarter or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the value of goodwill may be impaired. Our impairment evaluation of goodwill generally consists of an initial qualitative assessment of our reporting unit to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, a quantitative assessment, based on a combination of discounted cash flows and a market approach based on revenue and earnings multiples, is performed which requires us to estimate future cash flows, growth rates and economic and market conditions. If the quantitative assessment indicates that the carrying value of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is calculated and recognized during that period. Measurement of such an impairment loss would be based on the excess of the carrying amount over fair value. The Company has one reporting unit for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment. During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $158.0 million. No goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the second quarter of fiscal 2026, and no goodwill impairment charges were recorded during the first half of fiscal 2025. Goodwill impairment charges are included in Goodwill impairment on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). See Note 3 for additional information.
Fair Value Measurements — Fair value is defined as the exchange price, or exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The fair value of financial instruments is categorized based on the level of judgment associated with the inputs used to measure their fair values. Fair value is measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy, which are described as follows:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires us to develop our own assumptions when pricing the financial instruments, such as cash flow modeling assumptions
The assets' or liabilities' fair value measurement level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value framework requires that we maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
There were no assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 4, 2026 or January 3, 2026.
Generally, long-lived assets and goodwill are recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis after such assets have been impaired. As of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, certain long-lived assets were determined to be impaired and as such were measured at fair value at the time of the impairment determination. For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026, we recognized $0.8 million and $1.4 million of impairment of long-lived assets, respectively, which was included in Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2025, we recognized $9.0 million and $10.8 million of impairment of long-lived assets, respectively, of which $6.1 million and $7.9 million, respectively, resulted from the Restructuring Plan, as defined in Note 12, and was included in Restructuring charges, net, and $2.9 million in each respective period was included in SG&A on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). For discussion on the fair value determination of goodwill and the impairment charge recorded in the first half of fiscal 2026, see Note 1 under "Goodwill" and Note 3. For additional information, see "Property and Equipment" and "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" within Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2025 Form 10-K. Fair value was determined using Level 3 inputs at the time of impairment.
There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between levels within the fair value hierarchy during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026.
Our financial assets and liabilities are carried at cost, which generally approximates their fair value, as described below:
Cash and cash equivalents, independent operator ("IO") receivables, other accounts receivable and trade accounts payable — The carrying value of such financial instruments approximates their fair value due to factors such as their short-term nature, their variable interest rates or the effect of the related allowance for expected credit losses.
Independent operator notes — The carrying value of such financial instruments approximates their fair value due to the effect of the related allowance for expected credit losses. In the first half of fiscal 2026, we increased our allowance for IO notes and IO receivables in connection with Operator Agreement Terminations, as discussed further in Note 2 and Note 12.
Long-term debt — The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our significant financial liabilities that are not recorded at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 4, 2026 | | January 3, 2026 |
| Carrying Amount (1) | | Estimated Fair Value (2) | | Carrying Amount (1) | | Estimated Fair Value (2) |
| Financial Liabilities: | | | | | | | |
| Senior term loan (Level 2) | $ | 265,602 | | | $ | 266,250 | | | $ | 272,905 | | | $ | 273,750 | |
| Revolving credit facility (Level 2) | $ | 240,000 | | | $ | 240,000 | | | $ | 220,000 | | | $ | 220,000 | |
_______________________
(1)The carrying amounts of the senior term loan as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026 were net of debt issuance costs of $0.6 million and $0.8 million, respectively.
(2)The estimated fair value of the senior term loan and revolving credit facility borrowings under the 2023 Credit Agreement, as defined in Note 4, was deemed to approximate the carrying value, excluding unamortized debt issuance costs, because the interest rate is variable with short reset periods and is reflective of the current market rate.
Revenue Recognition
Net Sales — We recognize revenue from the sale of products at the point of sale, net of any taxes or deposits collected and remitted to governmental authorities. For e-commerce related sales in which a third-party provides home delivery service, revenue is recognized upon delivery to the customer. Our performance obligations are satisfied upon the transfer of goods to the customer, at the point of sale, and payment from customers is also due at the time of sale. Discounts provided to customers by us are recognized at the time of sale as a reduction in net sales as the products are sold. Discounts provided by IOs are not recognized as a reduction in net sales as these are provided solely by the IO who bears the incremental costs arising from the discount. We do not accept manufacturer coupons.
We did not have any material contract assets or receivables from contracts with customers, any revenue recognized in the current year periods from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods, any material performance obligations other than our gift card deferred revenue liability, or any material costs to obtain or fulfill a contract as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026.
Gift Cards — We record a deferred revenue liability when a Grocery Outlet gift card is sold. Revenue related to gift cards is recognized as the gift cards are redeemed, which is when we have satisfied our performance obligation. While gift cards are generally redeemed within 12 months, some are never fully redeemed. We reduce the liability and recognize revenue for the unused portion of the gift cards ("breakage") under the proportional method, where recognition of breakage income is based upon the historical run-off rate of unredeemed gift cards. Our gift card deferred revenue liability was $3.5 million and $4.5 million as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively. Breakage amounts were immaterial for both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025.
Disaggregated Revenues — The following table presents net sales revenue by type of product for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
Perishable (1) | $ | 455,372 | | | $ | 451,033 | | | $ | 896,359 | | | $ | 881,778 | |
Non-perishable (2) | 737,392 | | | 728,739 | | | 1,462,757 | | | 1,423,561 | |
| Total net sales | $ | 1,192,764 | | | $ | 1,179,772 | | | $ | 2,359,116 | | | $ | 2,305,339 | |
_______________________
(1) Perishable departments include dairy and deli; produce and floral; and fresh meat and seafood.
(2) Non-perishable departments include non-perishable grocery; frozen foods; beer and wine; general merchandise; and health and beauty care.
Variable Interest Entities — In accordance with the variable interest entities sub-section of Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 810, Consolidation, we assess at each reporting period whether we, or any consolidated entity, are considered the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE") and therefore required to consolidate the financial results of the VIE in our condensed consolidated financial statements. Determining whether to consolidate a VIE may require judgment in assessing (i) whether an entity is a VIE, and (ii) if a reporting entity is a VIE's primary beneficiary. A reporting entity is determined to be a VIE's primary beneficiary if it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact a VIE's economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or rights to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to a VIE.
We had 502, 529 and 511 stores operated by IOs as of July 4, 2026, January 3, 2026 and June 28, 2025, respectively. We have agreements in place with each IO. The IO orders merchandise exclusively from us which is provided to the IO on consignment. Under the independent operator agreement (the "Operator Agreement"), the IO selects a majority of merchandise that we consign to the IO, which the IO chooses from our merchandise order guide according to the IO's knowledge and experience with local customer purchasing trends, preferences, historical sales and similar factors. The Operator Agreement gives the IO discretion to adjust our initial prices if the overall effect of all price changes at any time comports with the reputation of our Grocery Outlet retail stores for selling quality, name-brand consumables and fresh products and other merchandise at extreme discounts. The IO is required to furnish initial working capital and to acquire certain store and safety assets. The IO is also required to hire, train and employ a properly trained workforce sufficient in number to enable the IO to fulfill its obligations under the Operator Agreement. Additionally, the IO is responsible for expenses required for business operations, including all labor costs, utilities, credit card processing fees, supplies, taxes, fines, levies and other expenses. Either party may terminate the Operator Agreement without cause upon no less than 75 days' notice.
As consignor of all merchandise to each IO, the aggregate net sales proceeds from merchandise sales belongs to us. Net sales related to IO stores were $1.13 billion and $1.12 billion for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively, and $2.24 billion and $2.19 billion for the first half of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively. We, in turn, pay each IO a commission based on a share of the gross profit of the store. Inventories and related net sales proceeds are our property, and we are responsible for store rent and related occupancy costs. IO commissions are expensed and included in SG&A. IO commissions were $169.7 million and $169.7 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively, and $340.7 million and $331.4 million for the first half of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively. IO commissions of $7.7 million and $6.1 million were included in accrued and other current liabilities as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively.
An IO may fund its initial store investment from existing capital, a third-party loan or most commonly through a loan from us, as further discussed in Note 2. As collateral for IO obligations and performance, the Operator Agreement grants us the security interests in the assets owned by each IO related to the respective store. Since the total investment at risk associated with each IO is not sufficient to permit each IO to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, each IO is a VIE that we have a variable interest in. To determine if we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE, we evaluate whether we have (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the IO's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the IO that could potentially be significant to the IO. Our evaluation includes identification of significant activities and an assessment of the IO's ability to direct those activities.
Activities that most significantly impact the IO's economic performance relate to sales and labor. Sales activities that significantly impact the IO's economic performance include determining what merchandise the IO will order and sell and the price of such merchandise, both of which the IO controls. The IO is also responsible for all of its own labor. Labor activities that significantly impact the IO's economic performance include hiring, training, supervising, directing, compensating (including wages, salaries and employee benefits) and terminating all of the employees of the IO, activities which the IO controls. Accordingly, the IO has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the IO's economic performance. Furthermore, the mutual termination rights associated with the Operator Agreement illustrate the lack of ultimate control over the IO. Therefore, we are not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs.
Our maximum exposure, in accordance with ASC Topic 810, to the IOs is generally limited to the IO notes and IO receivables due from these entities, which were $82.3 million and $88.3 million, gross, as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively. See Note 2 for additional information.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted
Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2024-03 — In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU No. 2024-03, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40) ("ASU 2024-03"). ASU 2024-03 requires public entities to disclose, in the notes to financial statements, specified information about certain costs and expenses, including the amounts of purchases of inventory, employee compensation, depreciation and intangible asset amortization included in each expense caption presented on the face of the income statement, a qualitative description of the amounts remaining in these expense captions that are not separately disaggregated quantitatively, and the total amount of selling expenses and an entity's definition of selling expenses. ASU 2024-03, as clarified by ASU No. 2025-01, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures (Subtopic 220-40), is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026 and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027, with early adoption permitted. Further, the amendments in ASU 2024-03 should be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
ASU No. 2025-06 — In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU No. 2025-06, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) ("ASU 2025-06"). ASU 2025-06 removes all references to prescriptive and sequential software development stages throughout Subtopic 350-40, and therefore requires an entity to start capitalizing software costs when management has authorized and committed to funding the software project, and it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. The amendments in ASU 2025-06 further specify and clarify disclosure requirements for property, plant and equipment and intangibles, as well as supersede the website development costs guidance and incorporate the recognition requirements for website-specific development costs. ASU 2025-06 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027 and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods, with early adoption permitted. Further, the amendments in ASU 2025-06 should be applied using a transition approach that is prospective, modified based on the project status and whether software costs were capitalized before the adoption date, or retrospective. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Note 2. Independent Operator Notes and Independent Operator Receivables
The amounts included in IO notes and IO receivables consist primarily of funds we loaned to IOs, net of estimated uncollectible amounts. IO notes, which are payable on demand and have no maturity date, typically bear interest at rates between 4.00% and 9.95%. Accrued interest receivable on IO notes is included within the "independent operator receivables and current portion of independent operator notes, net of allowance" line item on the condensed consolidated balance sheets and was $3.3 million and $3.9 million as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively. There were no IO notes that were past due or on a non-accrual status due to delinquency as of July 4, 2026 or January 3, 2026. Notes and receivables from our IOs participating in our Temporary Commission Adjustment Program ("TCAP"), as detailed below, are not considered to be past due or on a non-accrual status due to delinquency and are excluded from such measures.
IO notes and IO receivables are financial assets which are measured and carried at amortized cost. An allowance for expected credit losses is deducted from (for expected losses) or added to (for expected recoveries) the amortized cost basis of these assets to arrive at the net carrying amount expected to be collected for such assets.
The allowance is estimated using an expected loss framework, which includes information about past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that impact the collectibility of the reported amounts of the assets over their lifetime. The allowance is evaluated on a collective basis for assets with shared risk characteristics and credit quality indicators. The primary shared risk characteristic and credit quality indicator pools that we use as a basis for collective evaluation include:
•TCAP — Includes the notes and receivables from IOs with stores that have been open for more than 18 months that are participating in our TCAP as of the end of each reporting period. TCAP allows us to provide a greater commission to participating IOs who require assistance in meeting their working capital needs for various reasons, such as new or increased competition or differences in IO skills and experience.
•Non-TCAP — Includes the notes and receivables from IOs with stores that have been open for more than 18 months that are not participating in TCAP as of the end of each reporting period.
•New store — Includes the notes and receivables from IOs with stores that have been open for less than 18 months as of the end of each reporting period, and may or may not be participating in TCAP.
Assets without such shared risk characteristics or credit quality indicators, such as assets with unique circumstances or with delinquencies and historical losses in excess of their TCAP, non-TCAP or new store peers are evaluated on an individual basis. In the first half of fiscal 2026, we increased our allowance for IO notes and IO receivables by $15.4 million to reflect estimated credit losses on amounts advanced to certain independent operators subject to the Operator Agreement Terminations in connection with the Optimization Plan, as discussed further in Note 12.
Amounts due from IOs and the related allowances as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026 consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Allowance | | Net |
| Gross | | Current Portion | | Long-term Portion | | Total | | Current Portion | | Long-term Portion |
| July 4, 2026 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Independent operator notes | $ | 51,016 | | | $ | (457) | | | $ | (13,736) | | | $ | 36,823 | | | $ | 2,236 | | | $ | 34,587 | |
| Independent operator receivables | 31,293 | | | (15,304) | | | (1,480) | | | 14,509 | | | 11,865 | | | 2,644 | |
| Total | $ | 82,309 | | | $ | (15,761) | | | $ | (15,216) | | | $ | 51,332 | | | $ | 14,101 | | | $ | 37,231 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Allowance | | Net |
| Gross | | Current Portion | | Long-term Portion | | Total | | Current Portion | | Long-term Portion |
| January 3, 2026 | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Independent operator notes | $ | 57,532 | | | $ | (454) | | | $ | (13,864) | | | $ | 43,214 | | | $ | 2,301 | | | $ | 40,913 | |
| Independent operator receivables | 30,743 | | | (11,799) | | | (1,427) | | | 17,517 | | | 14,682 | | | 2,835 | |
| Total | $ | 88,275 | | | $ | (12,253) | | | $ | (15,291) | | | $ | 60,731 | | | $ | 16,983 | | | $ | 43,748 | |
A summary of activity in the IO notes and IO receivables allowance was as follows (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
| Beginning balance | $ | 35,395 | | | $ | 21,611 | | | $ | 27,544 | | | $ | 18,479 | |
Provision for IO notes and IO receivables reserves (1) | 1,518 | | | 3,291 | | | 19,483 | | | 6,574 | |
| | | | | | | |
Write-off of uncollectible IO notes and IO receivables (2) | (5,936) | | | (1,724) | | | (16,050) | | | (1,875) | |
Ending balance | $ | 30,977 | | | $ | 23,178 | | | $ | 30,977 | | | $ | 23,178 | |
_______________________
(1) For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026, includes $(0.1) million and $15.4 million, respectively, related to certain Operator Agreement Terminations under the Optimization Plan, as defined in Note 12.
(2) For the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026, includes $3.6 million and $11.7 million, respectively, related to certain Operator Agreement Terminations under the Optimization Plan, as defined in Note 12.
The following tables present the outstanding gross balance of IO notes by fiscal year of origination and credit quality indicator as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026 (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal Year of Origination | | |
| Credit Quality Indicator | 2026 (YTD) | | 2025 | | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | Prior | | Total |
| July 4, 2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TCAP | $ | 2,035 | | | $ | 3,708 | | | $ | 4,082 | | | $ | 2,078 | | | $ | 2,604 | | | $ | 2,896 | | | $ | 17,403 | |
| Non-TCAP | 4,933 | | | 5,972 | | | 4,381 | | | 2,111 | | | 2,751 | | | 3,980 | | | 24,128 | |
| New store | 2,984 | | | 6,501 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 9,485 | |
| Total | $ | 9,952 | | | $ | 16,181 | | | $ | 8,463 | | | $ | 4,189 | | | $ | 5,355 | | | $ | 6,876 | | | $ | 51,016 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal Year of Origination | | |
| Credit Quality Indicator | 2025 | | 2024 | | 2023 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | Prior | | Total |
| January 3, 2026 | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| TCAP | $ | 4,826 | | | $ | 5,982 | | | $ | 3,972 | | | $ | 3,907 | | | $ | 1,589 | | | $ | 2,489 | | | $ | 22,765 | |
| Non-TCAP | 7,253 | | | 4,745 | | | 2,762 | | | 3,680 | | | 2,285 | | | 2,689 | | | 23,414 | |
| New store | 9,808 | | | 1,545 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 11,353 | |
| Total | $ | 21,887 | | | $ | 12,272 | | | $ | 6,734 | | | $ | 7,587 | | | $ | 3,874 | | | $ | 5,178 | | | $ | 57,532 | |
TCAP IO Notes
Notes of IOs participating in our TCAP represented 44.7% and 50.6% of total IO note balances as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively.
A total of $1.1 million of IO notes were added into our TCAP during the second quarter of fiscal 2026. The weighted-average contractual interest rate of these IO notes was 4.00% as of July 4, 2026, a reduction from the standard rate of 9.95%. In addition, $0.1 million of IO notes were transferred from TCAP to Non-TCAP during the second quarter of fiscal 2026.
A total of $3.3 million of IO notes were added into our TCAP during the first half of fiscal 2026. The weighted-average contractual interest rate of these IO notes was 4.00% as of July 4, 2026, a reduction from the standard rate of 9.95%. In addition, $0.3 million of IO notes were transferred from TCAP to Non-TCAP during the first half of fiscal 2026.
Note 3. Goodwill
The following table summarizes the change in the net goodwill balance for the period presented (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Impairment | | Net Carrying Amount |
| Balance at January 3, 2026 | | $ | 782,835 | | | $ | (149,000) | | | $ | 633,835 | |
| Impairment loss | | — | | | (158,000) | | | (158,000) | |
| Balance at July 4, 2026 | | $ | 782,835 | | | $ | (307,000) | | | $ | 475,835 | |
Goodwill is subject to an annual impairment evaluation which is performed during our fourth quarter or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the value of goodwill may be impaired.
During the first quarter of fiscal 2026, we determined that a triggering event had occurred as a result of a decline in our stock price, necessitating an interim goodwill impairment evaluation. We performed a quantitative assessment as of April 4, 2026, and concluded that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeded its estimated fair value. Accordingly, we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $158.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2026.
For the quantitative impairment assessment, we used a combination of an income approach and a market approach, which were equally weighted, to determine the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. For the income approach, a discounted cash flow model was used that required forecasts of cash flows, assumptions such as revenue growth rates and gross profit margins, among others, and an estimate of weighted-average cost of capital that we believe approximates the assumptions from a market participant’s perspective. For the market approach, a guideline public company model was used, which required judgment in estimating key assumptions including the selection of guideline companies and multiples of sales revenue and EBITDA. These estimates incorporated many uncertain factors which could be impacted by changes in market conditions, interest rates, growth rates, tax rates, costs, customer behavior, regulatory environment and other macroeconomic changes. In addition, we considered the reasonableness of the fair value of the reporting unit by assessing the implied enterprise value control premium based on our market capitalization. We determined that the implied control premium was reasonable which corroborates our fair value estimates. We categorized the fair value determination as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to our use of internal projections and unobservable measurement inputs.
Assumptions used in impairment testing are made at a point in time and require significant judgment; therefore, they are subject to change based on the facts and circumstances present at each impairment test date. Additionally, these assumptions are generally interdependent and do not change in isolation.
No goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2026, and no goodwill impairment charge was recorded in the first half of fiscal 2025.
Note 4. Long-term Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| July 4, 2026 | | January 3, 2026 |
| 2023 Credit Agreement: | | | |
| Senior term loan due 2028 | $ | 266,250 | | | $ | 273,750 | |
| Revolving credit facility | 240,000 | | | 220,000 | |
| | | |
| Long-term debt, gross | 506,250 | | | 493,750 | |
Less: Unamortized debt issuance costs | (648) | | | (845) | |
| Long-term debt, less unamortized debt issuance costs | 505,602 | | | 492,905 | |
| Less: Current portion | (15,000) | | | (15,000) | |
| Long-term debt, net | $ | 490,602 | | | $ | 477,905 | |
2023 Credit Agreement
We are party to a credit agreement, dated February 21, 2023 (the "2023 Credit Agreement"), with Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and a syndicate of lenders that consists of (i) a senior secured term loan facility (the "senior term loan") and (ii) a senior secured revolving credit facility (the "revolving credit facility" and, together with the senior term loan, the "credit facilities") in an aggregate principal amount of $400.0 million. The revolving credit facility includes sub-commitments for $50.0 million letters of credit and $25.0 million of swingline loans.
As of July 4, 2026, interest on borrowings under the credit facilities was based on one-month Term SOFR with an applicable margin of 2.25%. Borrowings under the 2023 Credit Agreement bear interest at a rate equal to, at our option, either (a) the base rate, which is defined as a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the greatest of (i) the federal funds rate then in effect, plus 0.50%, (ii) the prime rate then in effect and (iii) a specified Term SOFR (as defined in the 2023 Credit Agreement) rate plus 1.00%, subject to the interest rate floors set forth therein, plus an applicable margin ranging from 0.75% to 1.75% based on our Total Net Leverage Ratio (as defined in the 2023 Credit Agreement); and (b) an adjusted Term SOFR rate determined on the basis of a one, three or six month interest period, plus 0.10%, subject to the interest rate floors set forth therein, plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.75% to 2.75% based on our Total Net Leverage Ratio.
The 2023 Credit Agreement permits us to add incremental term loan facilities, increase any existing term loan facility, increase revolving commitments, and/or add incremental replacement revolving credit facility tranches. The aggregate principal amount of such incremental facilities are limited to (a) an amount not in excess of the sum of the greater of $200.0 million and 100% of Consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the 2023 Credit Agreement), subject to certain limitations, plus (b) voluntary prepayments of any term loan facility, voluntary permanent reductions of the commitments for the revolving credit facility and voluntary prepayments of indebtedness secured by liens on the collateral securing the credit facilities, subject to certain exceptions, plus (c) an amount such that (assuming that the full amount of any such incremental revolving increase and/or incremental replacement revolving credit facility was drawn, and after giving effect to any appropriate pro forma adjustment events) we would be in compliance, on a pro forma basis (but excluding the cash proceeds of such incurrence), with a Total Net Leverage Ratio of 3.00 to 1.00.
Our obligations under the 2023 Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.'s direct and indirect wholly owned restricted subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions. All obligations under the 2023 Credit Agreement, and the guarantee of such obligations, are secured, subject to permitted liens and other exceptions, by substantially all of the Company’s assets and those of each subsidiary guarantor.
The 2023 Credit Agreement requires us to make scheduled quarterly amortization payments on the senior term loan, which were $1.875 million from June 2023 through March 2025, and are $3.75 million from June 2025 through December 2027, with the remaining balance due on February 21, 2028. We may voluntarily prepay the credit facilities, in whole or in part, at any time without premium or penalty, subject to reimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in applicable cases.
The senior term loan and the revolving credit facility under the 2023 Credit Agreement mature on February 21, 2028.
Senior Term Loan due 2028
The senior term loan under the 2023 Credit Agreement had an interest rate of 5.99% as of July 4, 2026.
Revolving Credit Facility
The aggregate outstanding principal balance under the revolving credit facility was $240.0 million and $220.0 million as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively. As of July 4, 2026, we had $6.2 million of outstanding letters of credit and $153.8 million of remaining borrowing capacity available under the revolving credit facility. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility had an interest rate of 5.99% as of July 4, 2026.
We are required to pay a quarterly commitment fee ranging from 0.15% to 0.30% on the daily unused amount of the commitment under the revolving credit facility based upon our Total Net Leverage Ratio. The unused commitment fee rate was 0.20% as of July 4, 2026. We are also required to pay fronting fees and other customary fees for letters of credit issued under the revolving credit facility.
Debt Covenants
The 2023 Credit Agreement contains certain customary representations and warranties, subject to limitations and exceptions, and affirmative and customary covenants. The 2023 Credit Agreement contains certain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability and the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to: pay dividends or distributions, repurchase equity, prepay junior debt and make certain investments; incur additional debt or issue certain disqualified stock and preferred stock; incur liens on assets; merge or consolidate with another company or sell, assign, transfer, lease, convey or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of its assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; and allow to exist certain restrictions on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to the borrower. The 2023 Credit Agreement also contains financial performance covenants requiring us to satisfy a maximum total net leverage ratio test and a minimum interest coverage ratio test as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. The maximum total net leverage ratio test requires us to be in compliance with a Total Net Leverage Ratio no greater than 3.25 to 1.00 as of the last day of each test period ending after December 31, 2025, subject to certain adjustments set forth in the 2023 Credit Agreement. The minimum interest coverage ratio test requires us to be in compliance with a Consolidated Interest Coverage Ratio (as defined in the 2023 Credit Agreement) of no less than 1.75 to 1.00 as of the last day of each test period.
As of July 4, 2026, we were in compliance with all applicable financial covenant requirements for the 2023 Credit Agreement.
Schedule of Principal Maturities
Principal maturities of debt as of July 4, 2026 are as follows (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | |
| Remainder of fiscal 2026 | $ | 7,500 | |
| Fiscal 2027 | 15,000 | |
| Fiscal 2028 | 483,750 | |
| Fiscal 2029 and thereafter | — | |
| |
| |
| Total | $ | 506,250 | |
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net, consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
| Interest on loans | $ | 7,745 | | | $ | 8,103 | | | $ | 15,416 | | | $ | 16,100 | |
| Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discounts | 227 | | | 227 | | | 455 | | | 455 | |
| Interest on finance leases | 49 | | | 55 | | | 92 | | | 114 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Interest income | (1,079) | | | (1,232) | | | (2,254) | | | (2,522) | |
| Capitalized interest | (370) | | | (609) | | | (768) | | | (1,083) | |
| Interest expense, net | $ | 6,572 | | | $ | 6,544 | | | $ | 12,941 | | | $ | 13,064 | |
Note 5. Stockholders' Equity
Share Repurchase Program
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, our Board of Directors (the "Board") approved a new share repurchase program (the "2024 Share Repurchase Program"). The 2024 Share Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date and authorizes us to repurchase up to $100.0 million of our outstanding common stock (inclusive of fees and commissions) utilizing a variety of methods including open-market purchases, accelerated equity repurchase programs, privately negotiated transactions, block trades and under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. Any repurchased shares are constructively retired and returned to an unissued status.
As of July 4, 2026, we had $100.0 million of repurchase authority remaining under the 2024 Share Repurchase Program.
Note 6. Share-based Awards
For a discussion of our share-based incentive plans, refer to Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements in our 2025 Form 10-K.
Share-based Award Activity
During the first half of fiscal 2026, we granted market-based restricted stock units ("MSUs"), which vest in a single installment following a three-year performance period subject to continued service and the achievement of specified stock price targets based on the Company's common stock during the final 30 consecutive trading days of the performance period. In addition, we granted time-based restricted stock units ("RSUs") during the first half of fiscal 2026 with vesting periods ranging from one to three years.
The grant-date fair value of MSUs is estimated using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The significant assumptions used in the valuation model are as follows:
•Expected term — Represents the period from the grant date to the end of the three-year performance period.
•Expected volatility — Based on the historical volatility of our common stock over a period commensurate with the expected term of the award.
•Risk-free interest rate — Based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the grant date, with maturities approximating the expected term of the award.
•Dividend yield — Assumed to be zero, as we have not historically paid, and do not expect to pay, cash dividends on our common stock.
The grant date fair value of MSUs awarded during the first half of fiscal 2026 was estimated using the Monte Carlo valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 26 Weeks Ended | | |
| July 4, 2026 | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Expected volatility | 56.1 | % | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | 3.7 | % | | | | | | |
Dividend yield | — | % | | | | | | |
Expected term (in years) | 2.78 | | | | | | |
Grant date fair value (per share unit) | $ | 4.56 | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes stock option activity under all equity incentive plans during the first half of fiscal 2026 (amounts in thousands, except option, per option and term data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |
| Number of Options | | Weighted-Average Exercise Price | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term | | Aggregate Intrinsic Value |
Time-Based Stock Options | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding as of January 3, 2026 | 1,716,759 | | $ | 14.79 | | | | |
| Granted | — | | — | | | | |
| Exercised | (12,276) | | 8.36 | | | | |
Forfeited | (419,960) | | 15.78 | | | | |
Options outstanding as of July 4, 2026 | 1,284,523 | | $ | 14.53 | | 6.2 | | $ | 36 |
Options vested and expected to vest as of July 4, 2026 | 1,284,523 | | $ | 14.53 | | 6.2 | | $ | 36 |
Options exercisable as of July 4, 2026 | 723,923 | | $ | 16.39 | | 4.2 | | $ | 36 |
Market-Based and Performance-Based Stock Options | | | | | | | |
Options outstanding as of January 3, 2026 | 240,396 | | $ | 11.86 | | | | |
| Granted | — | | — | | | | |
| Exercised | — | | — | | | | |
Forfeited | (34,105) | | 11.64 | | | | |
Options outstanding as of July 4, 2026 | 206,291 | | $ | 11.90 | | 7.3 | | $ | 46 |
Options vested and expected to vest as of July 4, 2026 | 206,291 | | $ | 11.90 | | 7.3 | | $ | 46 |
Options exercisable as of July 4, 2026 | 39,624 | | $ | 12.03 | | 1.6 | | $ | 46 |
The following table summarizes RSU activity under all equity incentive plans during the first half of fiscal 2026:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term |
Unvested balance as of January 3, 2026 | 1,521,255 | | | $ | 15.20 | | | |
| Granted | 2,365,039 | | | 6.43 | | | |
| Vested | (751,202) | | | 15.97 | | | |
Forfeited | (334,085) | | | 9.44 | | | |
Unvested balance as of July 4, 2026 | 2,801,007 | | | $ | 8.28 | | | 2.1 |
RSUs that vested during the first half of fiscal 2026 had grant date fair values totaling $12.0 million.
The following table summarizes MSU and performance-based restricted stock unit ("PSU") activity under the Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. 2019 Incentive Plan during the first half of fiscal 2026:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Number of Shares | | Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value | | Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term |
Unvested balance as of January 3, 2026 | 151,400 | | | $ | 27.29 | | | |
| Granted | 1,499,213 | | | 4.56 | | | |
Adjustment for expected performance achievement (1) | 111 | | | — | | | |
| Vested | (151,135) | | | 27.29 | | | |
Forfeited | (184,505) | | | 4.23 | | | |
Unvested balance as of July 4, 2026 (2) | 1,315,084 | | | $ | 4.62 | | | 1.6 |
_______________________
(1)Represents the year-to-date adjustment to previously granted awards based on performance expectations as of July 4, 2026.
(2)Up to an additional 3,158,889 MSUs and PSUs could potentially be included if the actual performance level achieved exceeds the current expected performance level (with 200% being the maximum performance level achievement).
PSUs vested during the first half of fiscal 2026 had grant date fair values totaling $4.1 million. No MSUs vested during the first half of fiscal 2026.
Share-based Compensation Expense
We recognize compensation expense for share-based awards by amortizing the grant date fair value on a straight-line basis over the expected vesting period to the extent we determine the achievement of the grant's service and/or performance vesting requirements is probable. We recognize share-based award forfeitures in the period such forfeitures occur.
Share-based compensation expense consisted of the following (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
Time-based and market-based stock options | $ | 358 | | | $ | 581 | | | $ | 1,134 | | | $ | 792 | |
| | | | | | | |
| RSUs | 2,870 | | | 3,214 | | | 5,726 | | | 6,137 | |
MSUs and PSUs | 540 | | | (1,835) | | | 663 | | | 489 | |
| | | | | | | |
Share-based compensation expense | $ | 3,768 | | | $ | 1,960 | | | $ | 7,523 | | | $ | 7,418 | |
Note 7. Income Taxes
Our income tax expense (benefit) and effective income tax rate were as follows (amounts in thousands, except percentages):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ | 3,568 | | | $ | 1,267 | | | $ | (493) | | | $ | (4,444) | |
| Effective income tax rate | 38.8 | % | | 20.3 | % | | 0.3 | % | | 19.5 | % |
Our tax provision for interim periods was historically determined using an estimated annual effective tax rate ("estimated AETR"), adjusted for discrete events arising in each respective fiscal quarter. When forecasted ordinary annual pre‑tax income is near breakeven, small changes in estimated annual results may result in significant volatility in the annual effective income tax rate that is not considered reliable and meaningful. In such circumstances, the income tax effects are recognized discretely in the interim period ("discrete ETR"). During the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026, we utilized the discrete ETR method to compute our income tax provision as the estimated AETR method would not provide a reliable and meaningful estimate of our tax provision.
Our effective income tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 was higher than the combined U.S. federal and state statutory income tax rates primarily due to shortfalls from share-based compensation and deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Our effective income tax rate for the first half of fiscal 2026 was lower than the combined U.S. federal and state statutory income tax rates primarily due to non-deductible goodwill impairment.
The change in our effective income tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2025 was primarily attributable to changes in our levels of earnings. The change in our effective income tax rate for the first half of fiscal 2026 compared to the first half of fiscal 2025 was primarily attributable to non-deductible goodwill impairment recognized during the first half of fiscal 2026.
Our policy is to recognize interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of the income tax provision in our condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and include accrued interest and penalties with the related income tax liability on our condensed consolidated balance sheets. To date, we have not recognized any interest and penalties, nor have we accrued for or made payments for interest and penalties. We had no uncertain tax positions as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively.
Note 8. Related Party Transactions
Related Party Leases
As of July 4, 2026, January 3, 2026 and June 28, 2025, we leased 14 store locations and one warehouse location from entities in which Eric Lindberg, Jr., Chairman of the Board and former Chief Executive Officer (who also served as Interim President and Chief Executive Officer for a portion of fiscal 2024 and the first quarter of fiscal 2025), his family, or an executive officer of the Company, had a direct or indirect financial interest. As of July 4, 2026, the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to these properties were $43.8 million and $49.0 million, respectively. As of January 3, 2026, the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to these properties were $44.7 million and $49.8 million, respectively. These related parties received aggregate lease payments from us of $1.9 million and $1.9 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively, and $3.8 million and $3.8 million for the first half of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively.
Independent Operator Notes and Independent Operator Receivables
We offer interest-bearing notes to IOs and the gross amount of IO operating notes and IO receivables due was $82.3 million and $88.3 million as of July 4, 2026 and January 3, 2026, respectively. See Note 2 for additional information.
Note 9. Commitments and Contingencies
From time to time, we may be a party to legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business, some of which may be covered by insurance. We establish an accrual for legal proceedings if and when those matters reach a stage where they present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. We monitor those matters for developments that would affect the likelihood of a loss and the accrued amount, if any, thereof, and adjust the amount as appropriate. If the loss contingency at issue is not both probable and reasonably estimable, we do not establish an accrual, but will continue to monitor the matter for developments that could make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. If there is at least a reasonable possibility that a material loss will occur, we will provide disclosure regarding the contingency.
Assessments of legal proceedings can involve a series of complex judgments about future events and can rely heavily on many different estimates and assumptions. The categories of legal proceedings in which we are involved may include multiple lawsuits and claims, may be spread across multiple jurisdictions and courts which may handle the lawsuits and claims differently, may involve numerous and different types of plaintiffs, and raise claims and damages based on specific allegations that may not apply to other matters. These and other factors contribute to the complexity of these legal proceedings and make it difficult for us to predict outcomes and make reasonable estimates of any resulting losses or ranges of possible losses, which is further complicated by the fact that a resolution of one or more matters may impact the resolution of other matters in terms of timing, amount of liability, or both. Unfavorable rulings, developments, or settlements could result in charges substantially in excess of amounts currently accrued, including for matters for which no accruals are currently recorded because losses are not currently probable or reasonably estimable.
Based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances, we do not currently believe our legal proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. However, actual outcomes may differ from those expected and the matters disclosed below could have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows in a future period.
On January 30 and March 28, 2025, respectively, two federal securities class action lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California against Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. and certain of its former officers purportedly on behalf of purchasers of our common stock, which were later consolidated into one lawsuit (the "2025 Class Action"). The 2025 Class Action alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose material adverse facts regarding our transition to new and upgraded internal systems. The 2025 Class Action seeks remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), including an undisclosed amount of monetary damages, interest, fees and other costs. The lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint on August 19, 2025, and the Company filed its motion to dismiss on October 21, 2025. Briefing on the Company’s motion to dismiss was completed on January 30, 2026. The hearing on the Company’s motion to dismiss scheduled for March 19, 2026 was vacated and the matter is now submitted on the briefs.
On April 28 and May 2, 2025, respectively, two federal stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers purportedly on behalf of the Company, which were later consolidated into one lawsuit (the "2025 Derivative Lawsuit"). The 2025 Derivative Lawsuit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, abuse of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and for violations of Sections 10(b), 14(a), and 20(a) of the Exchange Act, based on similar allegations to those at issue in the 2025 Class Action. The 2025 Derivative Lawsuit seeks, among other relief, undisclosed damages, restitution, fees and other costs, and the institution of corporate governance reforms. On July 29, 2025, the court stayed the 2025 Derivative Lawsuit pending resolution of the Company's motion to dismiss the 2025 Class Action.
On March 20 and March 26, 2026, two additional stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery and U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, respectively, against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers purportedly on behalf of the Company, asserting claims for breach of fiduciary duty and related claims based on substantially the same allegations as the 2025 Class Action and the 2025 Derivative Lawsuit. On April 17, 2026, the U.S. District Court action was dismissed without prejudice. On June 6, 2026, the court stayed the Delaware Court of Chancery action pending resolution of the Company's motion to dismiss the 2025 Class Action.
On March 16, 2026, a separate federal securities class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California against the Company and certain of its current and former officers purportedly on behalf of purchasers of our common stock (the "2026 Class Action"). The 2026 Class Action alleges that the defendants violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and/or failing to disclose material adverse facts regarding the Company’s growth strategy, financial performance, and the effectiveness of its restructuring plan, and seeks remedies under the Exchange Act, including an undisclosed amount of monetary damages, interest, fees and other costs.
On April 13 and May 15, 2026, respectively, two federal stockholder derivative lawsuits were filed in the U.S. District Court in the Northern District of California against certain of the Company’s current and former directors and officers purportedly on behalf of the Company, which were later consolidated into one lawsuit (the "2026 Derivative Lawsuit"). The 2026 Derivative Lawsuit asserts claims for breach of fiduciary duty and related claims based on similar allegations to those at issue in the 2026 Class Action. On June 26, 2026, the court stayed the 2026 Derivative Lawsuit pending resolution of any motion for summary judgment in the 2026 Class Action.
We intend to defend the above securities and derivative lawsuits vigorously.
Due to the stages of these proceedings and the lack of specific damages requests, we have currently determined the above lawsuits do not present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable and, further, we are unable to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses for such lawsuits.
Note 10. Earnings (Net Loss) Per Share
The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings (net loss) per share (amounts in thousands, except per share data):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
| Numerator | | | | | | | |
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 5,626 | | | $ | 4,961 | | | $ | (174,696) | | | $ | (18,356) | |
| Denominator | | | | | | | |
Weighted-average shares outstanding – basic | 99,014 | | | 98,081 | | | 98,720 | | | 97,801 | |
Effect of dilutive options (1) | 3 | | | 61 | | | — | | | — | |
Effect of dilutive RSUs and PSUs (1) | 756 | | | 318 | | | — | | | — | |
Weighted-average shares outstanding – diluted (2) | 99,773 | | | 98,460 | | | 98,720 | | | 97,801 | |
Earnings (net loss) per share: | | | | | | | |
| Basic | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | (1.77) | | | $ | (0.19) | |
| Diluted | $ | 0.06 | | | $ | 0.05 | | | $ | (1.77) | | | $ | (0.19) | |
_______________________
(1)In calculating diluted weighted-average shares outstanding, we are required to include contingently issuable shares for market-based stock option awards, MSUs and PSUs as if the end of the reporting period were the end of the applicable contingency period, provided the underlying conditions are satisfied.
(2)For the first half of fiscal 2026 and the first half of fiscal 2025, there is no difference in the weighted-average shares outstanding used in the above calculations due to the Company's net loss.
The following weighted-average common share equivalents were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (net loss) per share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
Stock options | 1,675 | | 1,745 | | 1,716 | | 1,478 |
RSUs | 651 | | 369 | | 1,425 | | 870 |
| Total | 2,326 | | 2,114 | | 3,141 | | 2,348 |
Note 11. Segment Information
We are a retailer of quality, name-brand consumables and fresh products sold primarily through a network of independently operated stores. We manage our business on a consolidated basis and have one operating and one reportable segment. The accounting policies of the segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. In addition, all of our sales were made to customers located in the U.S. and all property and equipment is located in the U.S.
The chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), who is our President and Chief Executive Officer, assesses performance for the segment and decides how to allocate resources based on net income (loss), which is reported on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The CODM uses this measure in deciding where to reinvest profits and to monitor budget versus actual results. The measure of segment assets is reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as total assets.
Information for the segment, including the significant expenses regularly provided to the CODM, is provided in the following tables for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 | | July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
| Net sales | $ | 1,192,764 | | | $ | 1,179,772 | | | $ | 2,359,116 | | | $ | 2,305,339 | |
| Less: | | | | | | | |
Cost of sales (1) | 830,115 | | | 817,575 | | | 1,649,561 | | | 1,599,344 | |
Commission expenses (2) | 168,889 | | | 169,691 | | | 338,257 | | | 331,411 | |
Other selling expenses (3) | 76,316 | | | 78,965 | | | 154,533 | | | 153,495 | |
General and administrative expenses (4) | 60,367 | | | 56,318 | | | 126,600 | | | 117,144 | |
Restructuring charges, net (5) | 5,428 | | | 11,157 | | | 23,619 | | | 45,032 | |
Goodwill impairment | — | | | — | | | 158,000 | | | — | |
Other segment items (6) | 3,768 | | | 1,960 | | | 7,523 | | | 7,418 | |
| Depreciation and amortization expenses | 32,115 | | | 31,334 | | | 63,271 | | | 61,231 | |
| Interest income | (1,079) | | | (1,232) | | | (2,254) | | | (2,522) | |
Interest expense (7) | 7,651 | | | 7,776 | | | 15,195 | | | 15,586 | |
Income tax expense (benefit) | 3,568 | | | 1,267 | | | (493) | | | (4,444) | |
Net income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss) | $ | 5,626 | | | $ | 4,961 | | | $ | (174,696) | | | $ | (18,356) | |
_______________________
(1)Cost of sales includes merchandise costs, inventory markdowns, inventory losses, transportation costs and distribution and warehousing costs and excludes depreciation and amortization expenses, which were $1.9 million and $1.5 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively, and $3.6 million and $2.9 million for the first half of fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2025, respectively.
(2)Commission expenses represent commissions earned by IOs.
(3)Other selling expenses include occupancy for all stores, our portion of maintenance costs for IO stores, the cost of opening new IO stores and payroll, benefits, maintenance, supplies and utilities for company-operated stores.
(4)General and administrative expenses include payroll and benefits for corporate and field support, marketing and advertising, insurance and professional services and operator recruiting and training costs.
(5)Net restructuring charges include net costs associated with the Optimization Plan and the Restructuring Plan. See Note 12 for additional information.
(6)Other segment items represents share-based compensation expense.
(7)Interest expense primarily includes interest on loans, amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discounts, and interest on finance leases, less capitalized interest. See Note 4 for further discussion.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 26 Weeks Ended |
| July 4, 2026 | | June 28, 2025 |
| Purchases of property and equipment | $ | 94,507 | | | $ | 119,669 | |
| Investments in intangible assets and licenses | 5,969 | | | 10,801 | |
| Total capital expenditures | $ | 100,476 | | | $ | 130,470 | |
Note 12. Restructuring
Optimization Plan
We initiated a business optimization plan during the first quarter of fiscal 2026, intended to strengthen long-term profitability and cash flow generation, improve operational execution, optimize our existing store footprint and align with our disciplined new store growth strategy (the "Optimization Plan"). The Optimization Plan provides for the closure of 36 financially underperforming stores ("Closure Stores"), including the termination, sublease or assignment of the applicable store leases; the termination, sublease or assignment of a lease for a distribution center facility that we are no longer utilizing (together with the store leases, the "Lease Exits"); and the termination of operator agreements with IOs for the Closure Stores as well as certain other store locations (the "Operator Agreement Terminations").
We estimate that we will incur between $15 million and $24 million in net total restructuring charges in fiscal 2026 and fiscal 2027 related to the Optimization Plan, and we expect these actions to be substantially completed by the first quarter of fiscal 2027. Estimated net restructuring charges incurred or expected to be incurred include bad debt expense and cash expenses for the Operator Agreement Terminations, as well as costs associated with the Lease Exits. We have negotiated, or intend to negotiate, a lease termination, sublease, or assignment with the landlords of the Lease Exits. We expect to incur net restructuring charges for the Lease Exits which primarily include lease termination fees, costs to prepare the premises for surrender to the landlords, sublessee or assignee, and idle property costs, partially offset by the net non-cash write-off of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities associated with these leases.
During the first half of fiscal 2026, we closed all 36 Closure Stores, and we substantially completed the Operator Agreement Terminations. We also increased the provision for IO notes and IO receivables reserves and wrote off uncollectible IO notes and IO receivables associated with these store locations, as further discussed in Note 2. In addition, we negotiated lease terminations with the landlords for certain of the Lease Exits and wrote-off the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities associated with these leases. We also entered into a sublease for the distribution facility we are no longer using. For the leases associated with the Lease Exits, we incurred costs to prepare the premises for surrender to the landlords and idle property costs, net of proceeds received from sales of assets.
The following table summarizes charges incurred related to the Optimization Plan during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2026 (amounts in thousands), which are included in Restructuring charges, net on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended | | | | |
| July 4, 2026 | | July 4, 2026 | | | | | | |
Cash restructuring charges: | | | | | | | | | |
Costs associated with the Lease Exits (1) | $ | 13,066 | | | $ | 13,856 | | | | | | | |
Costs associated with the Operator Agreement Terminations | 1,133 | | | 2,742 | | | | | | | |
| Legal, professional and other costs | 589 | | | 845 | | | | | | | |
Total cash restructuring charges | 14,788 | | | 17,443 | | | | | | | |
| Net non-cash restructuring charges (credits): | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Non-cash bad debt expense (credit) associated with the Operator Agreement Terminations | (97) | | | 15,439 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Net write-off of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities | (8,607) | | | (8,607) | | | | | | | |
Other net non-cash restructuring charges (2) | (656) | | | (656) | | | | | | | |
| Total net non-cash restructuring charges (credits) | (9,360) | | | $ | 6,176 | | | | | | | |
| Total restructuring charges, net | $ | 5,428 | | | $ | 23,619 | | | | | | | |
_______________________
(1)Cash costs associated with the Lease Exits primarily include lease termination costs, costs to prepare the premises for surrender to the landlords and idle property costs, net of proceeds received for sales of assets.
(2)Other net non-cash restructuring charges include credits related to non-cash rent associated with the Lease Exits and loss on disposal of long-lived assets.
The following table summarizes the restructuring liability activity for the Optimization Plan during the first half of fiscal 2026 (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lease Termination Costs | | Operator Agreement Termination Costs | | Legal, Professional and Other Costs | | Total | | | | |
Balance at January 3, 2026 | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | | | |
| Cash restructuring charges | 13,856 | | | 2,742 | | | 845 | | | 17,443 | | | | | |
| Cash payments | (12,632) | | | (2,742) | | | (292) | | | (15,666) | | | | | |
Balance at July 4, 2026 | $ | 1,224 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 553 | | | $ | 1,777 | | | | | |
Restructuring Plan
We initiated a restructuring plan during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024, intended to improve our long-term profitability, cash flow generation and return on invested capital, optimize the footprint of new store growth, and lower our cost base (the "Restructuring Plan"). The actions under the Restructuring Plan were substantially completed in the second quarter of fiscal 2025. The Restructuring Plan included (i) the termination of a total of 28 leases for unopened stores in suboptimal locations and the discontinued development of certain future store sites where we had incurred initial costs, but leases had not yet been signed, (ii) the cancellation of certain capital-intensive warehouse projects and (iii) a reduction in headcount in building a more scalable cost structure.
The following table summarizes charges incurred during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2025 related to the Restructuring Plan, which are included in Restructuring charges, net on the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) (amounts in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 13 Weeks Ended | | 26 Weeks Ended | | | | |
| June 28, 2025 | | June 28, 2025 | | | | | | |
Cash restructuring charges: | | | | | | | | | |
Lease termination costs | $ | 5,019 | | | $ | 34,112 | | | | | | | |
Employee severance and benefit costs | — | | | 1,532 | | | | | | | |
Legal, professional and other costs | — | | | 1,522 | | | | | | | |
Total cash restructuring charges | 5,019 | | | 37,166 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Non-cash impairment and disposal of long-lived assets | 6,138 | | | 7,866 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total restructuring charges | $ | 11,157 | | | $ | 45,032 | | | | | | | |