Item 1. Business
Overview
We are a leading provider and operator of large horsepower contract compression infrastructure in the U.S, supporting the critical movement and processing of natural gas across key production regions. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Kodiak Services, formed in 2011, we have built and operated a substantial fleet of high-reliability compression assets for more than a decade. On July 3, 2023, we completed our IPO and our common stock is currently trading on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “KGS.” Our business is centered on long‑term customer relationships, operational excellence, and disciplined capital deployment, positioning us to deliver stable performance while supporting the essential infrastructure needs of the domestic energy industry.
Our business is managed through the following two operating segments: Contract Services and Other Services.
Our Contract Services and related services are critical to our customers’ ability to reliably produce, gather and transport natural gas and oil. We are a market leader in the Permian Basin, which is the largest producing natural gas and oil basin in the U.S. We operate our large horsepower compression units under fixed-revenue term contracts with many upstream and midstream customers. We believe large horsepower compression units serve more stable applications, receive longer initial contracts, are more likely to be renewed, and produce higher margins, ultimately generating recurring cash flow and return on invested capital. When properly maintained, our compression assets have long useful lives, consistent with the expected production lives of the key regions where we operate. We believe our customer-centric business model positions us as the preferred contract compression operator for our customers and creates long-standing relationships. We strategically invest in the training, development, and retention of our highly skilled and dedicated employees and believe their expertise and commitment to excellence enhances and differentiates our business model. Furthermore, we maintain an intense focus on being one of the most sustainable and responsible operators of contract compression infrastructure.
Our other services (“Other Services”) consist of a broad range of services to support the needs of our customers, including station construction, customer-owned compression maintenance and overhaul, freight and crane charges, parts sales and other ancillary time and material-based offerings. Our Other Services offerings are often cross-sold with Contract Services, bolstering cash flow generation with no associated capital expenditures.
We focus on and are an industry leader in large horsepower compression. Approximately 80% of our 4.5 million overall fleet horsepower is categorized as large horsepower, which we define as horsepower in an amount greater than 1,000 arising from a single unit. Due to lower initial reservoir pressures, production from unconventional resources such as the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale requires significantly more compression horsepower than from conventional production. This need for additional horsepower in those regions supports our large horsepower strategy. Additionally, increased demand for large horsepower infrastructure is driven by multi-well pad drilling, overall well density, and large-scale gathering systems.
We believe the quality of our relationships with our customers, the historical reliability of our Contract Services and the structure of our contracts produce stable, recurring cash flow. The combination of the reliability and critical nature of our assets, the strong capabilities of our workforce, the strength of our customer relationships and contract structures, and our market leadership in the prolific Permian Basin have resulted in a historically high fleet utilization for our company. We are focused on being a resilient and sustainable enterprise and we seek to be a responsible operator that provides safe, reliable and efficient energy solutions. We will continue to innovate processes and technologies to assist our customers in meeting their emission reduction goals, while striving to provide a safe, inclusive and supportive environment for our employees and the communities where we operate. Finally, we operate our business with integrity and ethics and maintain a corporate governance structure that includes appropriate oversight and transparency in all aspects of our operations.
Our Operations
Our business model is focused on large horsepower Contract Services, which we believe is central to our customers’ efforts to meet the expected growing natural gas and oil demand from the Permian Basin and other regions in the U.S. Large horsepower Contract Services tend to garner longer-term contracts than small horsepower Contract Services and, as a result, we believe large horsepower Contract Services provide us with better predictability of revenues and cash flows. We believe our focus on customer service in top-tier regions, and the critical nature of our assets results in long-term customer relationships and enhanced financial stability for our business.
Our preventative and predictive maintenance and overhaul programs are designed to maximize mechanical availability and extend the useful lives of our assets over multiple decades. Our highly standardized fleet also enables streamlined and systematic training and on-site maintenance, which contributes to increased equipment reliability and mechanical availability. We continue to implement advanced systems to proactively analyze and monitor the operating conditions of our equipment, with a focus on maximizing uptime.
We believe our customers will continue to outsource a portion of their compression infrastructure needs, allowing them to limit their capital investments in compression equipment and increase their free cash flow or deploy capital on projects directly related to their core businesses. By outsourcing compression infrastructure, customers can efficiently address their changing compression requirements over time. Additionally, our customers benefit from the technical skills of our specialized personnel, and our focus on reliability and emissions reduction helps them advance their sustainability goals.
Business Segments
Our business is organized into two reportable segments: Contract Services and Other Services. Contract Services consists of operating Company-owned and customer-owned compression and gas treating and cooling infrastructure to enable the production, gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and oil. Other Services consists of a broad range of services to support the needs of our customers, including station construction, customer-owned compression maintenance and overhaul, freight and crane charges, parts sales and other ancillary time and material-based offerings. Our Other Services offerings are often cross-sold with Contract Services, bolstering cash flow generation with no associated capital expenditures.
Our Assets
Our compression asset base includes both high-quality, large and medium & small horsepower units. These assets serve as essential infrastructure in high-volume gas gathering systems, processing facilities, multi-well gas lift applications, and natural gas transmission systems. The horsepower our fleet provides is characterized by a focus on large horsepower compression units, which aligns with the evolving industry demand for such units. Large horsepower compression units enable multi-well pad development, reduce downtime, improve overall unit economics and provide lower emissions per horsepower relative to small horsepower compression units. Fleet standardization and continued geographic concentration allow us to lower our cost of operations and improve margins through economies of scale.
Below is a tabular overview of our fleet by horsepower as of December 31, 2025:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
(in thousands, except percentages) | Fleet Horsepower | Percent of Total Horsepower | Number of Units | Percent of Units |
| Large horsepower >1,000 horsepower | 3,553 | | 80% | 2,163 | | 46% |
| Medium & small horsepower <1,000 horsepower | 903 | | 20% | 2,573 | | 54% |
| Total | 4,456 | | 100% | 4,736 | | 100% |
We have standardized our fleet and operational processes, creating an effective fleet maintenance program and spare parts inventory, and efficient and resilient supply chain. Additionally, our assets are designed to serve a wide variety of large horsepower applications, such as gathering, processing and transportation of natural gas and centralized gas lift of oil.
Our Key Areas of Operation
We strategically focus on deploying our compression assets in leading onshore U.S. regions with long production horizons. We believe partnering with top-tier customers in regions with multi-decade resource life will support continued strong utilization and recontracting of our assets through energy industry and broader macroeconomic cycles.
As of December 31, 2025, approximately 82.8% of our compression assets were deployed in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale. The United States Energy Information Administration (“EIA”) expects continued growth in U.S. natural gas production through 2050, led by associated gas from the Permian Basin. We believe these two regions contain some of the largest and lowest-cost unconventional oil and natural gas resources in the U.S. Additionally, there are significant liquefied natural gas (“LNG”) export projects in development, and U.S. LNG export capacity is expected to continue to expand as additional projects are deployed, constructed and placed into service, according to the EIA. We expect this to translate into continued Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale natural gas production growth, and, in turn, ongoing demand for additional compression horsepower in these basins. We believe the U.S. will remain a significant net exporter of natural gas over the coming decades and therefore play an increasingly important role in global energy security, as the world continues to
require reliable and growing natural gas and oil production to support increasing global energy demand. In addition to the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale, we have compression assets in other key U.S. producing regions, including the Powder River Basin, Mid-Continent Region, DJ Basin, Appalachian Basin, Barnett Shale / East Texas Region and Black Warrior Basin.
Customers
We have established long-term commercial relationships with leading upstream and midstream customers in our key areas of operations. We believe alignment with our customers’ operational objectives is a key differentiator to our business, and our reputation for high mechanical availability has been central to earning and maintaining customer loyalty. We believe mechanical availability is a critical consideration for a customer in making its contract compression decisions, and we prioritize maintaining a consistently high level of mechanical availability to support customer uptime and contribute to stable revenue generation. We believe these factors position us as a preferred provider of large-horsepower contract compression services.
We employ a systematic and selective customer evaluation process that considers factors such as customers’ creditworthiness, size, and geological asset quality. For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024 and 2023, our four largest customers accounted for approximately 32%, 32%, and 33%, respectively, of our total revenues. Each of these customers is a S&P 500 constituent and investment grade-rated upstream or midstream company active in the Permian Basin. There was one customer accounting for more than 10% of total revenues in each of 2025, 2024 and 2023.
Our Sustainability Leadership
The energy industry continues to evolve as operators balance the need for reliable, affordable energy with changing regulatory and operational expectations. Our focus remains on being one of the most sustainable and responsible operators of contract compression infrastructure. Furthermore, we strive to provide a safe and supportive environment for the communities in which we live and the customers and employees with whom we work. We seek to continuously improve our operations, relationships with our stakeholders and ultimately maintain our position as a sustainable and responsible operator of contract compression infrastructure.
As part of our long-term strategy, we invest in modern compression equipment designed to meet stringent U.S. air-quality regulatory standards in challenging operating regions. It is important that we continue to develop and implement innovative strategies and technologies that further reduce emissions intensity and improve the operational reliability of our business. Many of our upstream and midstream customers have established operational or environmental objectives, and we work with them to provide compression solutions that align with their requirements.
Electric motor driven compression is also part of our long-term strategy to reduce emissions intensity across our fleet. We have begun deploying electric motor driven compression with select customers and have additional assets that we will deploy in the near future under long-term fixed-revenue contracts. In addition, in select geographic areas where electric infrastructure exists, we assist our customers in building out their electric compression infrastructure.
Our employees are central to our success. We maintain a robust safety culture that permeates all aspects of our business. Our comprehensive training program emphasizes safety, improving technical skills and professional development for employees across functional areas. This program is further bolstered through a virtual training program to better prepare our employees to safely address situations in the field. We created the Kodiak Cares Foundation to support employees and charitable causes in the communities in which we live and operate. We also remain committed to supporting veterans through targeted recruiting and hiring efforts and partnerships with organizations that assist veterans and active-duty military.
Compression Industry
Compression is a mechanical process whereby natural gas is compressed to a smaller volume resulting in higher pressures. This process is critical for the production, gathering, and transportation of natural gas. Without the increased pressure, gas cannot flow from the wellhead to end-markets. With the development of unconventional natural gas and oil resources, compression infrastructure becomes even more critical for the following reasons:
•In unconventional resources, natural gas tends to be produced at lower pressures due to the geological nature of the resources, requiring compression infrastructure immediately upon initial production and throughout most of the life of the well.
•Advancements in drilling, completion and production technologies have resulted in an increase in density of well locations and adoption of multi-well pads, allowing operators to achieve economies of scale with centralization of stations with more compression units and more horsepower per unit.
Given the essential nature of their operations, compression infrastructure providers benefit from stable cash flows and fixed-revenue contracts. Furthermore, large horsepower compression infrastructure is costly to install and move, and, therefore, many operators choose to outsource all or a portion of their compression infrastructure requirements so that they may deploy capital into their core business. By outsourcing, operators can more efficiently address their changing compression needs over time and are able to benefit from the specialized personnel and technical skills that compression infrastructure providers offer.
We believe U.S. compression infrastructure industry growth will be supported by the following factors:
•Continued, growing demand for U.S. natural gas driven principally by domestic natural gas consumption in the power sector, and exports of U.S.-produced natural gas and LNG.
•Replacement of production from maturing and aging conventional basins with production from unconventional sources, which tend to require more compression infrastructure, to accommodate the increase in natural gas demand while offsetting declining production.
•A continued emphasis by federal, state and local regulatory agencies as well as oil and gas producers on reducing the volume of natural gas that is flared during the production of crude oil, which will result in the need for additional field infrastructure to transport natural gas, which in turn will result in increased demand for compression infrastructure.
•The use of centralized gas lift as one of the more effective and efficient artificial lift technologies for the production of crude oil and is widely used by U.S. oil and gas producers in key unconventional basins like the Permian Basin and the Eagle Ford Shale.
General Contract Services Contract Structures
The following discussion describes the material terms generally common to our Contract Services contracts allocated to our Contract Services reporting unit. We maintain a general gas compression agreement with each of our customers and separate addenda for each compression unit.
Term and Termination
Our contracts typically have a primary term length between one and seven years, depending on the customer, application, location, and size of the compression unit, with large horsepower typically contracted for a primary term of three to five years. After the expiration of the primary term, our contracts continue on a month-to-month basis until renewed or until the contract is terminated by us or our customer, upon written notice. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 9.0% of our revenue-generating horsepower was on a month-to-month contract term.
Mechanical Availability Guarantee and Operations Standards and Specifications
All of our contracts provide a guarantee of specified mechanical availability. Our Contract Services equipment is typically mechanically available during instances of downtime attributable to events of force majeure or acts or failures to act by the customer (i.e., production-related downtime). Our Contract Services equipment is typically not mechanically available during all other instances of downtime including, without limitation, our scheduled and unscheduled maintenance.
We provide Kodiak-owned Contract Services under contracts that typically provide that we will supply all compression equipment, tools, parts and field service support to meet our customers’ requirements. Our contracts typically do not specify the compression equipment we will use; instead, the contracts typically specify required operating conditions and, in consultation with the customer, we determine what equipment is necessary to meet our contractual commitments.
Fees, Taxes and Expenses
Our customers typically pay a fixed monthly fee for our Contract Services similar to midstream “take-or-pay contracts.” The majority of our contracts include an annual inflation adjustment. Generally, we bill for our Contract Services on the 15th day of a month for the following month’s Contract Services (i.e., pre-billed) or at the beginning of the month for which our Contract Services are to be provided. Payments are generally due within 30 days of the invoice date. We are generally responsible for the costs and expenses associated with operation and maintenance of our equipment, although
certain fees and expenses are the responsibility of our customers under the terms of our contracts. For example, fuel gas necessary to operate our compression equipment is provided by our customers without cost to us. Further, ad valorem or business personal property taxes assessed on our compression equipment are generally reimbursed by our customers, as well as any sales tax related to our Contract Services. Additionally, our customers are typically responsible for any damage to our compression equipment caused by contaminants or liquid carryover in the compressed gas stream or inferior fuel gas.
We generally own the compression equipment in our fleet that we use to provide Contract Services, and we typically bear the risk of loss or damage to our equipment and tools and injury or death to our personnel outside the exceptions set forth in the contracts. Additionally, substantially all of our contracts include provisions eliminating our liability for consequential damages (e.g., damage to formations, lost production, damage to production equipment, etc.).
The vast majority of our contracts require our customers to pay for any out-of-pocket expenses associated with the cost of the mobilization and demobilization of our compression equipment to and from their locations.
Our contracts typically provide that both we and our customers are required to carry various types of insurance coverage including, but not limited to, general liability, workers’ compensation, employers’ liability, property, automobile and excess liability insurance.
Marketing and Sales
Our marketing and customer service functions are performed on a coordinated basis by our sales and operations teams. Sales, fleet and operations personnel analyze and scope new compression applications. Additionally, our salespeople regularly visit our customers to ensure customer satisfaction, to determine a customer’s needs related to existing Contract Services being provided and to determine the customer’s future compression requirements. This ongoing communication allows us to quickly identify and respond to our customers’ compression requirements and gives us significant insight into their activities.
Suppliers and Service Providers
We rely primarily on a small number of key vendors to manufacture, package and assemble our compression equipment. Although we rely primarily on these suppliers, we believe alternative sources for natural gas compression equipment are generally available if needed.
Competition
The contract compression and related services business is competitive. On a regional basis, we experience competition from numerous companies that may be able to adapt to changes more quickly within our industry and changes in economic conditions, more readily take advantage of available opportunities and adopt more aggressive pricing policies. We believe that we compete effectively based on our customer-centric business model, flexibility in meeting customer needs, price, equipment availability, quality and reliability of our Contract Services.
Seasonality
Our results of operations have not historically been materially affected by seasonality, and we do not currently have reason to believe that seasonal fluctuations will have a material impact in the foreseeable future.
Operating Risks and Insurance
We believe that our insurance coverage is customary for the industry and adequate for our business. As is customary in the compression industry, we review our safety equipment and procedures and carry insurance against most, but not all, risks of our business. Losses and liabilities not covered by insurance would increase our costs. The compression business can be hazardous, involving unforeseen circumstances, such as uncontrollable flows of gas or well fluids, fires and explosions or environmental damage. To address the hazards inherent in our business, we maintain insurance coverage that, subject to certain deductibles, includes physical damage coverage, third-party general liability insurance, employer’s liability, environmental and pollution and other coverage, although coverage for environmental and pollution related losses is subject to certain limitations. Under the terms of our standard Contract Services contract, we are responsible for maintaining insurance coverage on our compression equipment. No accidents or incidents have occurred that have caused us to experience a material adverse effect.
Governmental Regulation
We are subject to stringent and complex federal, state and local laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to protection of human health, safety and the environment. These regulations include compliance obligations for air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges and solid and hazardous waste disposal, as well as regulations designed for the protection of human health and safety and protected species. Compliance with these environmental laws and regulations could expose us to significant costs and liabilities and cause us to incur significant capital expenditures in our operations. We are often obligated to assist our customers in obtaining permits or approvals for their operations from various federal, state and local authorities. These permits and approvals can be denied or delayed, which may cause us to lose potential and current customers, interrupt our operations and limit our growth and revenue. Moreover, failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties, imposition of remedial obligations and other injunctive relief that could delay or prohibit our operations. Private parties may also have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce compliance, as well as to seek damages for non-compliance with environmental laws and regulations or for personal injury or property damage. While we believe that our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations and that continued compliance with current requirements would not have a material adverse effect on us, we cannot predict whether our cost of compliance will materially increase in the future. Any changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or the enforcement thereof, or passage of additional environmental laws and regulations that result in more stringent and costly requirements for pollution control equipment, waste handling, storage, transport, disposal or remediation could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial position.
See the section titled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry—Kodiak’s operations are subject to stringent environmental, health and safety regulation, and changes in these regulations could increase Kodiak’s costs or liabilities” in this Annual Report. The following is a discussion of material environmental and safety laws that relate to our operations.
Air Emissions
The CAA and comparable state laws regulate emissions of air pollutants from various industrial sources, including natural gas compressors, and impose certain monitoring and reporting requirements. Such emissions are regulated by air emissions permits, which are applied for and obtained through various state or federal regulatory agencies. Our standard natural gas Contract Services contract provides that the customer is responsible for obtaining air emissions permits and assuming the environmental risks related to site operations, but new regulatory requirements could have the effect of making projects more costly than our customers expected and could require the installation of more costly emissions controls, which could cause some of our customers not to pursue certain projects.
There can be no assurance that future requirements compelling the installation of more costly emission control equipment would not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash available for distribution. For additional information and associated risks, see the section titled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry—New regulations, proposed regulations and proposed modifications to existing regulations under the CAA, if implemented, could result in increased compliance costs and changes in customers’ demand and desired suppliers” of this Annual Report.
Climate Change
Climate change and greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions reduction initiatives continue to attract considerable public and scientific attention. Methane, a primary component of natural gas, and carbon dioxide, a byproduct of the burning of natural gas, are examples of GHGs. In recent years, the U.S. Congress has considered legislation to restrict or regulate GHG emissions. A number of states have also begun to address GHG emissions, primarily through the planned development of emissions inventories or regional GHG cap and trade programs. Depending on the particular program, we could be required to control GHG emissions or to purchase and surrender allowances for GHG emissions resulting from our operations. The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 also amended the CAA to require the Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) to impose a “waste emissions charge” on certain oil and gas sources that are already required to report under the EPA's Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. In November 2024, the EPA finalized a rule implementing the Inflation Reduction Act’s methane emissions requirements. However, in March 2025, the Trump Administration implemented a Congressional Review Act disapproval of the methane charge regulatory provisions.
Independent of Congress, the EPA has promulgated regulations controlling GHG emissions under its existing CAA authority. The requirement for certain large sources of GHG emissions to obtain and comply with permits could affect some of our and our customers’ largest new or modified facilities going forward but is not expected to cause us to incur material costs. The EPA has undertaken efforts to regulate emissions of methane (considered a GHG) in the natural gas and oil sector, with the adoption of additional, more stringent rules. It is currently unclear whether or to what extent the Trump Administration may reconsider these standards. See the section titled “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry—New regulations, proposed regulations and proposed modifications to existing regulations under the CAA, if implemented, could result in increased compliance costs and changes in customers’ demand and desired suppliers” of this Annual Report.
At the international level, the U.S. participated in the 21st Conference of the Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change in Paris, France (“COP21”), resulting in an agreement intended to nationally determine the participants’ contributions and set GHG emission reduction goals every five years beginning in 2020 (the “Paris Agreement”). While the Paris Agreement does not impose direct requirements on emitters, national plans to meet its pledge could result in new regulatory requirements or initiatives. Various state and local governments have also publicly committed to furthering the goals of the Paris Agreement. However, in January 2025, President Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement. Consequently, we cannot predict whether these pledges made during these international climate change meetings will lead to new regulatory requirements or initiatives or whether such requirements or initiatives will cause us to incur material costs should the U.S.’s participation in the Paris Agreement again change in the future.
Additionally, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted a final rule in March 2024 requiring disclosures on climate-related risks and impacts, governance, targets and Scope 1 and Scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions, but not Scope 3 emissions. Litigation in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit is ongoing, but as of early 2026, the SEC has withdrawn its defense of the rule. Thus, the ultimate scope, timing, and impact on our business remain uncertain, but compliance, if required, may result in increased legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly, and place strain on our personnel, systems and resources.
Although it is not currently possible to predict with specificity how any proposed or future GHG legislation, regulation, agreements or initiatives will impact our business, any legislation or regulation of GHG emissions that may be imposed in areas in which we conduct business or on the assets we operate could result in increased compliance or operating costs, additional operating restrictions or reduced demand for our services, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry—Kodiak’s business is subject to climate-related transitional risks, including evolving climate change legislation, regulatory initiatives and stakeholder pressures which could result in increased operating expenses and capital costs, financial risks and potential reduction in demand for Kodiak’s services.” Notwithstanding potential risks related to climate change, the International Energy Agency estimates that natural gas and oil will continue to represent a significant share of global energy use through 2040 under some, though not all, future scenarios. However, recent activism directed at shifting funding and/or demand away from companies with fossil fuel-related assets could result in limitations or restrictions on certain sources of funding for the energy sector. See “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry—A climate-related decrease in demand for natural gas and oil could negatively affect Kodiak’s business.”
Water Discharge
The Clean Water Act (“CWA”) and analogous state laws impose restrictions and strict controls with respect to the discharge of pollutants, including spills and leaks of oil and other substances, into waters of the United States (“WOTUS”). The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state agency. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit the discharge of dredge and fill material into regulated waters, including jurisdictional wetlands, unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA also requires the development and implementation of spill prevention, control and countermeasures, including the construction and maintenance of containment berms and similar structures, if required, to help prevent the contamination of navigable waters in the event of a petroleum hydrocarbon tank spill, rupture or leak at such facilities. Additionally, the CWA and analogous state laws require individual permits or coverage under general permits for discharges of storm water runoff from certain types of facilities. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990, as amended (the “OPA”), amended the CWA and established strict liability and natural resource damages liability for unauthorized discharges of oil into waters of the U.S. The OPA requires owners or operators of certain onshore facilities to prepare facility response plans for a discharge of oil into waters of the United States. Federal and state regulatory agencies can impose administrative, civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance with discharge permits or other requirements of the CWA, OPA, and analogous state laws and regulations. Our Contract Services do not currently generate process waste waters that are discharged into waters of the United States and we do not foresee this occurring in the future. In any event, our customers assume responsibility under the majority of our standard gas compression agreements for obtaining any permits that may be required under the CWA, whether for discharges or developing property by filling wetlands. Considerable legal uncertainty exists surrounding the standard for what constitutes jurisdictional waters and wetlands subject to the protections and requirements of the CWA.
Safe Drinking Water Act
A significant portion of our customers’ hydrocarbon production is developed from unconventional sources that require hydraulic fracturing as part of the completion process. Hydraulic fracturing involves the injection of water, sand and chemicals under pressure into the rock formation to stimulate hydrocarbon production. Increased regulation under the Safe Drinking Water Act could lead to greater opposition to, and litigation concerning, natural gas and oil activities utilizing hydraulic fracturing or injection wells for waste disposal, which could indirectly impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Solid and Hazardous Waste
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state laws control the management and disposal of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. These laws and regulations govern the generation, storage, treatment, transfer and disposal of wastes that we generate including, but not limited to, used oil, antifreeze, filters, sludges, paint, solvents and sandblast materials. The EPA and various state agencies have limited the approved methods of disposal for these types of wastes. Drilling fluids, produced waters and most of the other wastes associated with the exploration, development and production of natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil, if properly handled, are currently exempt from regulation as hazardous waste under RCRA and, instead, are regulated under RCRA’s less stringent non-hazardous waste provisions, state laws or other federal laws. However, any change in classification could result in an increase in the costs to manage and dispose of wastes, which could increase the costs of our customers’ operations.
Site Remediation
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and comparable state laws impose strict, joint and several liability without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct on certain classes of persons that are considered to have contributed to the release of a hazardous substance into the environment. These persons include the owner and operator of a disposal site where a hazardous substance release occurred and any company that transported, disposed of or arranged for the transport or disposal of hazardous substances released at the site. Under CERCLA, such persons may be liable for the costs of remediating the hazardous substances that have been released into the environment, for damages to natural resources and for the costs of certain health studies. Additionally, where contamination may be present, it is not uncommon for the neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury, property damage and recovery of response costs. Under most of our contracts, our customers must contractually indemnify us for certain damages we might incur as a result of the release into the environment of hazardous and toxic substances. Although we generate materials in the course of our operations that may be regulated as hazardous substances, we have not received notification that we may be potentially responsible for cleanup costs under CERCLA at any site and we are not currently responsible for any remedial activities at any properties we use. However, there is always the possibility that our future use of those properties may result in spills or releases of petroleum hydrocarbons, wastes or other regulated substances into the environment that may cause us to become subject to remediation costs and liabilities under CERCLA, RCRA or other environmental laws. We cannot provide any assurance that the costs and liabilities associated with the future imposition of such remedial obligations upon us would not have a material adverse effect on our operations or financial position.
Endangered Species Act and Migratory Birds
The Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) was established to protect endangered and threatened species. Pursuant to the ESA, if a species is listed as threatened or endangered, restrictions may be imposed on activities adversely affecting that species or its habitat. Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (“MBTA”) and to bald and golden eagles under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (“BGEPA”). The presence of any protected species or the final designation of previously unprotected species as threatened or endangered in areas where we operate could result in increased costs from species protection measures or could result in limitations, delays, or prohibitions on our customers’ exploration and production activities.
Safety and Health
The Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”) and comparable state laws and regulations govern the protection of the health and safety of employees. The OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA community right-to-know regulations under Title III of CERCLA and similar state statutes and regulations require that we organize and, as necessary, disclose information about hazardous materials used or produced in our operations to various federal, state and local agencies, as well as employees. Other OSHA standards regulate specific worker safety aspects of our operations.
Human Capital
Employees
As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately 1,300 full-time employees. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements.
We offer competitive and comprehensive compensation and benefits packages that include annual bonuses, stock awards, a 401(k) plan with employer contribution, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings account with employer contribution, dependent care flexible spending account, paid time off, family leave, an employee assistance program and tuition assistance, among many other benefits.
Safety, Health and Wellness
Safety is a core value of our Company. The success of our business depends fundamentally on the well-being of our people, and so we are committed to the safety, health and wellness of our employees. Our comprehensive safety program emphasizes education, training, standard operating procedures, policies, and reporting to empower employees to perform tasks using best safety practices.
Talent Development
We invest significant resources in developing the skilled workforce required to deliver our industry‑leading Contract Services. Our talent development programs combine technical training, professional development, and leadership readiness to support employee growth and ensure consistent, high‑quality service.
A core component of our technical training platform is our Technician Fundamentals program taught at our dedicated hands-on training facility, BEARS Academy. The Technician Fundamentals program provides a structured hands-on learning opportunity for both new and experienced technicians when they join Kodiak. The curriculum covers natural gas compression fundamentals, safety procedures, engine and compressor components and systems, electrical systems and panel boards, preventative maintenance, and troubleshooting, supplemented by virtual-reality scenarios for key standard operating procedures such as LOTO (lockout/tagout) and startup and shutdown. In 2025, over 270 employees graduated from the three-week Technicians Fundamentals program. BEARS Academy is also home to several other technical training courses, where our employees gain hands-on instruction in a safe, controlled environment, alongside a qualified trainer that enables them to practice with tools on equipment they work on every day. Kodiak maintains a formal technical training curriculum spanning multiple levels of technical proficiency to continuously invest in the development of our technicians’ learning. With a wide range of both internally developed courses and supplier-supported courses at BEARS Academy, our employees have gained tremendous skills and foundational competencies across our technical operations. To further expand capacity and strengthen our technical pipeline, we are constructing a significantly larger, state-of-the-art training facility for our new BEARS Academy home in Midland, scheduled to open in summer 2026.
In addition to technical training, Kodiak recognizes the importance of professional development, regardless of role or position. We provide both skill-based and job-specific courses designed to encourage all employees to grow in a manner that is meaningful to them. Our robust manager curriculum including topics such as coaching, performance management, conflict resolution, and financial training supports the transition and enhances leadership capabilities across the organization.
Recent Developments
Pending Acquisition of Distributed Power Solutions
On February 5, 2026, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire DPS, a provider of distributed power solutions in an equity and cash transaction valued at approximately $675.0 million at the time of signing per the terms of the purchase agreement, subject to adjustment in accordance with the purchase agreement. Per the terms of the purchase agreement, the purchase price includes $575.0 million in cash, subject to adjustment in accordance with the purchase agreement, and the issuance of 2,401,278 shares, representing approximately $100.0 million of the Company’s common stock based on the volume weighted average price of the Company’s stock price for the five days prior to February 5, 2026 of $41.64 to the sellers. The obligations of each of the parties to consummate the transactions contemplated by the purchase agreement are subject to customary conditions. The Company has agreed to pay to the sellers a termination fee of $37.1 million in the event the purchase agreement is terminated under certain circumstances.
Secondary Offerings and Share Repurchases
During 2025, affiliates of EQT AB, primarily Frontier TopCo Partnership, L.P., executed a series of secondary public offerings and Rule 144 sales of our common stock. In addition, we repurchased over 2.7 million shares from EQT affiliates during 2025 pursuant to our Share Repurchase Program. In the aggregate, these transactions reduced EQT’s ownership position from approximately 43.1% at the beginning of the year to zero by December 2, 2025. In total, approximately 38.5 million shares were sold by EQT affiliates in non-dilutive transactions, and we did not receive any proceeds from these offerings.
Dispositions
On September 30, 2025, we sold our operations and legal entities in Mexico to a third-party buyer as part of a strategic refocus on core U.S. contract compression activities. The disposal resulted in a $33.3 million net loss.
Dividends
On January 28, 2026, our Board declared a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share of common stock, or approximately $43.1 million, which was paid on February 20, 2026 to stockholders of record at the close of business on February 13, 2026
Available Information
We file Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, other reports and amendments to those reports with the SEC. Our website address is http://www.kodiakgas.com. We make available, free of charge at the “Investor Relations” section of our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. We also use our website as a means of disclosing additional information, including for complying with our disclosure obligations under the SEC’s Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure). The information contained on our website does not constitute part of this Annual Report. We will provide electronic or paper copies of our filings free of charge upon request.
The SEC maintains a website that contains these reports at http://www.sec.gov.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. As described in Part I “Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” this Annual Report contains forward-looking statements regarding us, our business, and our industry. The risk factors described below, among others, could cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in the section titled “Risk Factors,” alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. In that event, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and stockholders could lose all or part of their investment. Such risks include, but are not limited to:
Risks Related to Our Business and Our Industry
A long-term reduction in the demand for, or production of, natural gas or oil could adversely affect the demand for Kodiak’s business and services or the prices Kodiak charges for Kodiak’s business and services, which could result in a decrease in Kodiak’s revenues.
The demand for Kodiak’s business and services depends upon the continued demand for, and production of, natural gas and oil. The natural gas and oil industry is historically cyclical with levels of activity that are significantly affected by the levels and volatility of natural gas and oil prices. Kodiak may experience fluctuations in operating results as a result of the reactions of Kodiak’s customers to changes in natural gas and oil prices. Demand may be affected by, among other factors, natural gas prices, oil prices, weather, availability of alternative energy sources and the overall demand for energy. Additionally, in response to increased domestic energy costs, a declared national emergency, or other circumstances determined to be in the economic or other interest of the country, the U.S. government could restrict or ban the export of natural or oil, which would affect demand and could adversely affect our business. For example, in January 2024, in response to concerns from environmental groups, the U.S. announced a temporary pause on new authorizations of certain LNG exports, although the pause was subsequently lifted in January 2025. Any prolonged, substantial, material reduction in the demand for natural gas or oil would likely depress the level of production activity and result in a decline in the demand for Kodiak’s business and services, which could result in a reduction in Kodiak’s revenues.
The loss of one or more of Kodiak’s key customers and/or the deterioration of the financial condition of any of its customers would result in a decrease in Kodiak’s revenues and could adversely affect its financial results and may have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s financial condition.
The loss of one or more of Kodiak’s key customers may have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition. See Part II, Item 7.A, Concentration Risk, within this Annual Report for quantification of customer concentration. Further, during times when the natural gas or oil markets weaken, Kodiak’s customers are more likely to experience financial difficulties, including being unable to access debt or equity financing, which could result in a reduction in Kodiak’s customers’ spending for Kodiak’s services. A significant decline in commodity prices may cause certain of Kodiak’s customers to reconsider their near-term capital budgets, which may impact large-scale natural gas infrastructure and oil production activities. Reduced demand for Kodiak’s services could adversely affect its business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Kodiak may have difficulty in completing the acquisition of Distributed Power Solutions, LLC, in successfully integrating it and/or in achieving the expected growth, cost savings and/or synergies from such acquisition.
Kodiak recently announced our intent to acquire Distributed Power Solutions, LLC, a leading provider of turnkey, scalable and highly-reliable distributed power solutions serving a diverse set of customers and end markets. Even though Kodiak has executed a definitive agreement for the acquisition, there can be no assurance that Kodiak will be able to consummate
the transaction. In addition, even if Kodiak completes the acquisition, Kodiak may not be able to successfully address inherent risks in a timely manner, or at all. These inherent risks include, among other things: failure to achieve all or any expected growth, cost savings, synergies or other anticipated benefits of the acquisition; failure to successfully integrate the purchased operations and maintain uniform standard controls, policies and procedures; substantial unanticipated integration costs; loss of key employees, including those of the acquired business; diversion of management's attention from other business concerns; failure to retain the customers of the acquired business; additional debt and the assumption potentially unknown liabilities; and amortization of expenses. If we fail to successfully integrate DPS, Kodiak may not realize all or any of the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, and our future results of operations could be adversely affected.
Kodiak faces significant competition that may cause it to lose market share and have a material adverse effect on its financial condition.
The compression business is competitive. Kodiak’s ability to renew or replace existing contracts with its customers at rates sufficient to maintain current revenue and cash flows could be adversely affected by the activities of Kodiak’s competitors and Kodiak’s customers. If Kodiak’s competitors substantially increase the resources they devote to the development and marketing of competitive services or substantially decrease the prices at which they offer their services, Kodiak may be unable to compete effectively. Kodiak’s competitors may be able to adapt more quickly to technological changes within the industry and changes in economic and market conditions and more readily take advantage of acquisitions and other opportunities. In addition, Kodiak could face significant competition from new entrants into its industry. Some of these competitors may expand or construct newer, more powerful or more flexible compression fleets, which would create additional competition for Kodiak. All of these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
Kodiak’s customers may choose to vertically integrate their operations by purchasing and operating their own compression fleet, increasing the number of compression units they currently own, or using alternative technologies for enhancing oil production, which may have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business.
Kodiak’s customers that are significant producers, processors, gatherers and transporters of natural gas and oil may choose to vertically integrate their operations by purchasing and operating their own compression fleets in lieu of using Kodiak’s business and services for a variety of reasons, including customer reactions to changes in the pricing of our services, revised customer capital allocation strategies, failure to meet certain customer safety standards or any other reason. There are many technologies available for the artificial enhancement of oil production, and Kodiak’s customers may elect to use these alternative technologies instead of the gas lift compression Kodiak provides. Such vertical integration or use of alternative technologies could result in decreased demand for Kodiak’s business and services, which may have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, results of operations and financial condition, and reduce its cash available for distribution.
After the primary term of Kodiak’s contracts, such contracts are cancellable on 30 to 90 days’ notice, and Kodiak cannot be sure that such contracts will be extended or renewed after the end of the initial contractual term. Any such non-renewals, or renewals at reduced rates or the loss of contracts with any significant customer, could adversely impact Kodiak’s financial results.
The length of Kodiak’s Contract Services contracts with customers varies based on operating conditions and customer needs. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 9.0% of Kodiak’s revenue-generating horsepower was on a month-to-month basis with customers who continue to utilize Kodiak’s services following expiration of the primary term of their contracts. These customers can generally terminate their month-to-month Contract Services contracts on 30 to 90 days’ notice. Kodiak cannot be sure that a substantial number of these contracts will be extended or renewed by Kodiak’s customers or that any of Kodiak’s customers will continue to contract with Kodiak. The inability to negotiate extensions or renew a substantial portion of Kodiak’s Contract Services contracts, the renewal of such contracts at reduced rates, the inability to contract for additional services with Kodiak’s customers, or the loss of all or a significant portion of Kodiak’s services contracts with any significant customer, could lead to a reduction in revenue and net income and could require Kodiak to record additional asset impairments. This could have a material adverse effect upon Kodiak’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
The majority of Kodiak’s operations are located in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale, making Kodiak vulnerable to risks associated with operating in limited geographic areas, which could have an impact on its revenues.
Kodiak’s operations are geographically concentrated in the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale. As a result, Kodiak may be disproportionately exposed to the impact of regional supply and demand factors in the Permian Basin or Eagle Ford Shale caused by changed governmental regulations, curtailment of production or interruption of the processing or
transportation of natural gas and oil produced from the wells in these geographic areas. In addition, the effect of fluctuations on supply and demand may become more pronounced within specific geographic natural gas and oil producing areas such as the Permian Basin and Eagle Ford Shale, which may cause these conditions to occur with greater frequency or magnify the effects of these conditions. Due to the concentrated nature of Kodiak’s operations, Kodiak could experience any of these same conditions at the same time, resulting in a relatively greater impact on its revenues than these conditions might have on other companies that have more geographically diverse operations.
Kodiak may be unable to access the capital and credit markets or borrow on affordable terms to obtain additional capital that Kodiak may require, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial conditions.
Kodiak has financed its operating expenses and capital expenditures with a combination of cash provided by operating and financing activities. However, to the extent Kodiak is unable to finance its operating expenses, capital expenditures, scheduled interest and debt repayments and any future dividends with net cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under the ABL Credit Agreement or future financing arrangements, Kodiak may require additional capital. Periods of instability in the capital and credit markets (both generally and in the natural gas and oil industry in particular) could limit Kodiak’s ability to access these markets to raise debt or equity capital on affordable terms, to refinance borrowings under the ABL Credit Agreement or to obtain additional financing. Among other things, Kodiak’s lenders may seek to increase interest rates, enact tighter lending standards, refuse to refinance existing debt at maturity at favorable terms or at all, and may reduce or cease to provide funding to Kodiak. If Kodiak is unable to access the capital and credit markets on favorable terms, or if Kodiak is not successful in raising capital within the time period required or at all, Kodiak may not be able to grow or maintain its business, which could have a material adverse effect on its business, results of operations and financial condition.
Kodiak’s fleet may require additional operating or capital expenses to maintain over time, which could adversely impact its financial results.
Kodiak’s fleet may require additional operating expenses or capital expenditures to maintain over time, which could adversely impact its financial results. Such costs may include direct costs, such as labor, parts, materials and any other services that are unique in nature to each individual compression unit. The cost of additions or improvements to Kodiak’s fleet could adversely impact its financial results.
Impairment in the carrying value of long-lived assets, including impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets, could reduce Kodiak’s earnings.
Kodiak has a significant number of long-lived assets on its consolidated balance sheet. Under generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), Kodiak is required to review its long-lived assets, including goodwill and other intangible assets, for impairment when events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or such assets will no longer be utilized in the operating fleet. If business conditions or other factors cause the carrying value of assets to become unrecoverable, Kodiak may be required to record non-cash impairment charges. Events and conditions that could result in impairment in the value of Kodiak’s long-lived assets include, long-term extended reduction in demand for natural gas and oil, competition, advances in technology, adverse changes in the regulatory environment or other factors leading to a reduction in Kodiak’s expected long-term profitability.
Kodiak has in the past been, and may in the future be, subject to sales tax audits in jurisdictions where Kodiak operates. As a result, Kodiak may incur material unanticipated sales tax liabilities.
Taxing authorities in the jurisdictions in which Kodiak operates have in the past, and may in the future, audit Kodiak or otherwise challenge the amount of sales tax Kodiak has collected or paid. As a result, Kodiak may incur material unanticipated sales tax liabilities. For example, from October 2019 through April 2023, Kodiak received notices of audits from the State of Texas Comptroller’s office for the periods covering December 2015 through November 2023 (the “Sales Tax Audit”). During 2025, Kodiak received a settlement offer from the Texas Comptroller’s office to resolve certain of the outstanding Texas sales and use tax matters, pursuant to which Kodiak would be subject to interest and penalties for all open periods totaling $28.0 million. Kodiak has accepted the Texas Comptroller settlement offer for the Sales Tax Audit and is currently in the process of reviewing all open periods with the Texas Comptroller’s office.
If Kodiak is unable to make all payments required by any taxing authority as a result of an audit, settlement or otherwise, Kodiak could face additional interest or penalties, or other punitive actions, up to and including seizure of its assets or forfeiture of its sales tax permit. Payments and penalties related to sales taxes could have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Kodiak might be unable to employ or retain qualified technical personnel, which could hamper its present operations, limit its ability to grow or increase its costs.
Many of the compression units that Kodiak operates are mechanically complex and operate in harsh conditions. Kodiak believes that its success depends upon its ability to employ and retain a sufficient number of technical personnel who have the ability to utilize, enhance and maintain these compression units. Kodiak’s ability to maintain and expand its operations depends in part on its ability to utilize, replace, supplement and increase its skilled labor force. The demand for skilled workers is high, and supply is limited, especially in the Permian Basin. A significant increase in the wages paid by competing employers could result in a reduction of Kodiak’s skilled labor force or cause an increase in the wage rates that Kodiak must pay or both. If either of these events were to occur, Kodiak’s cost structure could increase, and its operations and growth potential could be impaired. Employee turnover may also lead to lost productivity and decrease employee engagement, which could adversely impact Kodiak’s business.
Additionally, Kodiak’s ability to hire, train and retain qualified personnel could become more challenging as Kodiak grows and to the extent energy industry market conditions are competitive. When general industry conditions are favorable, the competition for experienced operational and field technicians increases as other energy and manufacturing companies’ needs for the same personnel increase. Kodiak’s ability to grow or even to continue its current level of service to its current customers could be adversely impacted if Kodiak is unable to successfully hire, train and retain these important personnel. Similarly, Kodiak depends on its ability to hire and retain executive officers, and the departure of any such officers from Kodiak could have a significant effect on its business. In addition, effective succession planning for Kodiak’s employees and expansion planning is important to Kodiak’s long-term success. Failure to achieve these plans could hinder Kodiak’s strategic planning and execution and have a material adverse impact on Kodiak’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Any unionization efforts or labor regulation changes in certain jurisdictions in which Kodiak operates could divert management’s attention and could have a materially adverse effect on Kodiak’s operating results or limit Kodiak’s operational flexibility.
No Kodiak employees are represented by a union in collective bargaining with Kodiak. However, efforts could be made by employees and third parties from time to time to unionize portions of Kodiak’s workforce. In addition, Kodiak may be subject to strikes or work stoppages and other labor disruptions in the future. Any unionization efforts, collective bargaining agreements or work stoppages could have a materially adverse effect on Kodiak’s operating results or limit its operational flexibility. Further, our response to any union organizing efforts could negatively impact how our brand is perceived by our employees and customers and have material adverse effects on our business and future results.
Kodiak depends on a limited number of suppliers, and, particularly as a result of supply chain and logistics disruptions resulting from geopolitical disruptions and the resulting inflationary environment, Kodiak is vulnerable to product shortages, long lead times and price increases, which could have a negative impact on Kodiak’s results of operations.
The substantial majority of the components for Kodiak’s natural gas compression equipment are supplied by a limited number of key vendors. Kodiak’s reliance on these suppliers involves several risks, including price increases and a potential inability to obtain an adequate supply of required components in a timely manner on account of supplier nonperformance, extended lead times or otherwise. Kodiak also relies primarily on a limited number of vendors to package and assemble its compression units. Kodiak does not have long-term contracts with these suppliers or packagers, and a partial or complete loss of any of these sources could have a negative impact on Kodiak’s results of operations and could damage its customer relationships. In addition, the preferences of Kodiak’s customers with respect to particular vendors may change, which could require Kodiak to find new vendors. Some of these suppliers manufacture the components Kodiak purchases in a single facility, and any damage to that facility could lead to significant delays in delivery of completed compression units to Kodiak.
If Kodiak is unable to purchase compression equipment or components for its compression equipment on a timely basis to meet the demands of its customers, its existing customers may terminate their contractual relationships with Kodiak, or Kodiak may not be able to compete for business from new or existing customers, which, in each case, could have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, supply chain bottlenecks could adversely affect Kodiak’s ability to obtain necessary materials, parts or other components used in Kodiak’s operations or increase the costs of such items. A significant increase in the price of such equipment, materials and services and the resulting supply chain and logistics disruptions, or otherwise, could have a negative impact on Kodiak’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Kodiak’s operations entail inherent risks that may result in interruption of Kodiak’s operations and/or substantial liability. Kodiak does not insure against all potential losses and could be seriously harmed by unexpected liabilities.
Kodiak’s operations are subject to inherent risks, such as equipment defects, malfunctions and failures, natural disasters and other incidents that can result in uncontrollable flows of gas or well fluids, fires and explosions. In addition, Kodiak’s operations employees spend a significant amount of time driving from location to location, often on busy or statistically dangerous roadways, especially in the Permian Basin, which could lead to an increased risk of vehicular accidents. These risks could cause the interruption of Kodiak’s operations and the operations of its customers, and Kodiak may endure significant loss of health and life of employees and third-persons, equipment damage, revenue losses and reputational harm, all of which could have an adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, prospects and financial condition. Moreover, such risks could expose Kodiak to substantial liability for personal injury, death, property damage, pollution and other environmental damages. Kodiak’s insurance may be inadequate to cover its liabilities or subject to cancellation notices. Further, insurance covering the risks Kodiak faces or in the amounts it desires may not be available in the future or, if available, the premiums may not be commercially justifiable. If Kodiak were to incur substantial liability and such damages were not covered by insurance or were in excess of policy limits, resulted in cancellation of Kodiak’s policy, or if Kodiak were to incur liability at a time when it is not able to obtain liability insurance, its business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.
If Kodiak does not satisfy its mechanical availability guarantee, a customer has the ability to terminate its contracts.
Kodiak’s gas compression contracts provide a guarantee of specified mechanical availability of 95.0% to 98.0%. The calculation for mechanical availability includes any downtime that is incurred as a result of Kodiak’s operations, such as mechanical shutdowns, maintenance events and repairs or overhauls, but does not include any downtime caused by a mechanical failure or shutdown that occurs as a result of improper gas or objectionable liquids or solids in the gas or fuel stream, insufficient gas available for compression or fuel, any shutdown due to the applicable customer’s production or processing operations, or downtime not directly caused by Kodiak, including downtime due to “force majeure” events, such as acts of God, acts related to terrorism, strikes, lockouts and/or accidents. A failure to satisfy mechanical availability requirements under a contract for three consecutive months could result in termination of the applicable contract by the customer, which could have an adverse effect on Kodiak’s financial results.
Acts or threats of terrorism, acts of war, social unrest, cyber or physical security attacks, and other malicious acts of individuals or groups seeking to disrupt Kodiak’s operations could adversely impact Kodiak’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Kodiak’s operations are potential targets for terrorist acts and threats, acts of war, social unrest, cyber and physical security attacks, and other disruptive activities of individuals or groups, including by nation states or nation state-sponsored groups. There have been cyber and physical attacks within the energy industry on energy infrastructure in the past and there are likely to be additional attacks in the future. Kodiak and its suppliers and vendors have been subject to, and will likely continue to be subject to, attempts to disrupt operations, any of which could result in a material decrease in revenues and which increase costs to protect, repair, and ensure Kodiak’s assets and operate its infrastructure, systems, and business.
Risks Related to Regulatory Matters
Kodiak’s operations are subject to stringent environmental, health and safety regulations and changing expectations of other stakeholders with respect to sustainability practices, and changes in these regulations and/or expectations could increase Kodiak’s costs or liabilities.
Kodiak’s operations at customer sites are subject to stringent and complex federal, state and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including laws and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the environment, emissions controls and other environmental protection and occupational health and safety concerns. Environmental laws and regulations, such as CERCLA and comparable state laws, may impose strict, as well as joint and several, liability for environmental contamination, which could render Kodiak potentially liable for remediation costs, natural resource damages, the costs of certain health studies and other damages, regardless of whether Kodiak was responsible for the release or contamination, and even if Kodiak’s operations were lawful at the time of the release. In addition, third parties, including neighboring landowners, could file claims for personal injury, property damage and recovery of response costs. Remediation costs and other damages arising as a result of environmental laws and regulations, and costs associated with changes in existing environmental laws and regulations or the adoption of new environmental laws and regulations over time could adversely impact Kodiak’s or its customers’ financial condition or results of operations. Moreover, failure by Kodiak or its customers to comply with these environmental laws and regulations could result in the imposition of
administrative, civil and criminal penalties and the issuance of injunctions delaying or prohibiting operations, which could in turn have an adverse impact on Kodiak’s customers and its business.
Kodiak conducts operations in a wide variety of customer locations across the continental U.S. Kodiak’s customers are required to hold certain environmental permits or other authorizations and may require new or amended authorizations from time to time with respect to storm water discharges, hydraulic fracturing, waste handling or air emissions relating to equipment operations, including compression units, which subject Kodiak’s customers to new or revised permitting conditions that may be onerous or with respect to which compliance may be costly. Noncompliance by Kodiak’s customers with required permits or the failure to obtain additional permits could subject them to future penalties, operating restrictions, or delays in obtaining new or amended permits which could in turn have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are constantly evolving and may become increasingly complex and more stringent over time. In addition to the evolving regulatory environment, Kodiak may also face pressures from stakeholders, many of whom are focused on climate change, to prioritize sustainable energy practices, reduce Kodiak’s carbon footprint and promote sustainability while at the same time remaining a successfully operating public company, any or all of which may be difficult for Kodiak to achieve on such stakeholders’ desired timeline or at all. Future environmental health and safety laws and regulations (or changes to existing laws and regulations), and potentially future stakeholders’ focus on sustainability (or changes to such focus), may additionally negatively impact natural gas and oil exploration, as well as production, gathering and pipeline companies, including Kodiak’s customers, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of Kodiak’s operations.
New regulations, proposed regulations and proposed modifications to existing regulations under the CAA, if implemented, could result in increased compliance costs and changes in customers’ demand and desired suppliers.
New regulations or proposed modifications to existing regulations under the CAA may lead to adverse impacts on Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
In recent years, the EPA proposed and issued rules intended to reduce methane emissions from natural gas and oil sources. Changes to Subpart OOOO increase the stringency of existing standards and expand reduction requirements for new, modified, and reconstructed natural gas and oil sources. In addition, regulatory changes require states to develop plans to reduce methane emissions from existing sources that must be at least as effective as presumptive standards set by the EPA. However, in July 2025, the EPA proposed extending Subpart OOOO deadlines for sources and states to January 2027. If finalized, Kodiak cannot predict how the EPA and states will implement the final rule; regardless, Subpart OOOO regulation of air emissions from the natural gas and oil sector could result in increased expenditures for pollution control equipment, which could impact Kodiak’s customers’ operations and negatively impact Kodiak’s business.
Additionally, a 2024 rule issued by the EPA under the Inflation Reduction Act imposed a “waste emissions charge” on certain natural gas and oil sources that are already required to report under the EPA’s Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program and revised GHG reporting regulations for petroleum and natural gas systems (Subpart W). The rule also expands the emissions events that are subject to reporting requirements to include “other large release events” and applies reporting requirements to certain new sources and sectors. However, in March 2025, Congress under the Congressional Review Act disapproved the methane emissions charge rule and in September 2025, the EPA proposed to suspend GHG reporting for Subpart W until reporting year 2034. Nonetheless, when implemented, such programs could increase Kodiak’s operating costs and accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels, which could in turn have an adverse impact on Kodiak’s customers and thus adversely impact Kodiak’s business.
A climate-related decrease in demand for natural gas and oil could negatively affect Kodiak’s business.
Supply and demand for natural gas and oil is dependent upon a variety of factors, many of which are beyond Kodiak’s control. These factors include, among others, the potential adoption of new government regulations, including those related to fuel conservation measures and climate change regulations, technological advances in fuel economy, an economy-wide transition to lower GHG energy sources and energy generation devices. For example, legislative, regulatory or executive actions intended to reduce emissions of GHGs could increase the cost of consuming natural gas and oil, thereby potentially causing a reduction in the demand for such products. A broader transition to alternative fuels or energy sources, whether resulting from potential new government regulation, carbon taxes or consumer preferences, could result in decreased demand for natural gas and oil. Efforts by governments, international bodies, businesses and consumers to reduce GHGs and otherwise mitigate the effects of climate change are ongoing. The nature of these efforts and their effects on Kodiak’s business are inherently unpredictable and subject to change. Any decrease in demand for these products could consequently reduce demand for Kodiak’s services or impact Kodiak’s ability to obtain external financing and could have a negative effect on Kodiak’s business.
Kodiak’s business is subject to climate-related transitional risks, including evolving climate change legislation, regulatory initiatives and stakeholder pressures, which could result in increased operating expenses and capital costs, financial risks and potential reduction in demand for Kodiak’s services.
Combating the effects of climate change continues to attract considerable attention in the United States and internationally, including from regulators, legislators, companies in a variety of industries, financial market participants and other stakeholders. Climate change legislation and regulatory initiatives may arise from a variety of sources, including international, national, regional and state levels of government and associated administrative bodies, seeking to monitor, restrict or regulate existing emissions of GHGs, such as carbon dioxide and methane, as well as to restrict or eliminate future emissions. Accordingly, Kodiak’s business and operations, and those of Kodiak’s customers, are subject to executive, regulatory, political and financial risks associated with natural gas and the emission of GHGs.
The EPA has promulgated regulations controlling GHG emissions under its existing CAA authority. However, under the current administration, EPA is taking action to eliminate GHG regulation, including the February 12, 2026, rescission of the 2009 finding that GHGs endanger human health. Certain states have issued or may issue GHG regulations that could impact Kodiak or its customers.
At the international level, the U.S. joined the international community at COP21, which resulted in the Paris Agreement and a subsequent “nationally determined contribution” for U.S. GHG emissions that would achieve emissions reductions of at least 50% relative to 2005 levels by 2030. However, in January 2025, President Trump withdrew the United States from the Paris Agreement. Consequently, Kodiak cannot predict whether GHG initiatives will cause Kodiak to incur material costs should the U.S.'s participation in the Paris Agreement again change in the future.
Any legislation or regulation of GHG emissions that may be imposed in areas in which Kodiak conducts business or on the assets Kodiak operates could result in increased compliance or operating costs, additional operating restrictions or reduced demand for Kodiak’s services, and could have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Apart from governmental regulation, there are also financial risks for companies in the energy sector as certain stockholders and bondholders currently invested in energy companies may elect to shift some or all of their investments toward non-fossil fuel energy sources. In recent years, sustainability goals and programs, which typically include policies, practices and extralegal targets related to environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and corporate governance, have been a focus of investors and stakeholders across the industry. Limitation of investments in and financings for energy companies could result in the restriction, delay or cancellation of infrastructure projects and energy production activities. This potential for reduced access to the capital and financial markets, whether impacting Kodiak’s customers and/or Kodiak’s business, may further adversely affect the demand for and price of Kodiak’s securities.
Furthermore, some scientists have concluded that increasing concentrations of GHGs in the earth’s atmosphere are changing global climate patterns in a manner that results in significant weather-related effects, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, droughts, floods and other such events, in addition to more chronic changes such as shifting temperature, precipitation, and other meteorological patterns. Any increased frequency of extreme weather events could impact Kodiak’s operations in various ways, including increase or decrease in energy needs, damage to Kodiak’s facilities interruptions in service or supply chain, increased insurance premiums or increases to Kodiak’s cost of providing service. Such impacts may be proportionately more severe given the geographical concentration of Kodiak’s operations. Demand for Kodiak’s operations also depends in part on the volume of products being produced, processed and/or transported by Kodiak’s customers, which may also be impacted by similar risks. If any of these results occur, it could impact Kodiak’s assets and operations and cause Kodiak to incur costs in preparing for and responding to them.
Litigation risks also are increasing as a number of parties have sought to sue various natural gas and oil companies in state or federal court, alleging, among other things, that such companies created public nuisances by producing fuels that contributed to climate change or that the companies have been aware of the adverse effects of climate change for some time but defrauded their investors or customers by failing to adequately disclose those impacts. Should Kodiak be targeted by any such litigation, it may incur liability, and any such litigation targeting Kodiak’s customers could negatively impact their operation and, in turn, decrease demand for Kodiak’s operations.
An unfavorable ruling in any such case could significantly impact Kodiak’s operations and could have an adverse impact on its financial condition.
In sum, any legislation, regulatory programs or social pressures related to climate change could increase Kodiak’s costs and require substantial capital, compliance, operating and maintenance costs, reduce demand for Kodiak’s services and reduce Kodiak’s access to financial markets. Current, as well as potential future, laws and regulations that limit emissions of
GHGs or that otherwise promote the use of renewable energy over fossil fuel energy sources could increase the cost of Kodiak’s services and, thereby, further reduce demand and adversely affect Kodiak’s sales volumes, revenues and margins.
Kodiak’s financial results could be significantly impacted by uncertainty in U.S. trade policy, including uncertainty surrounding changes in tariffs, trade agreements or other trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other governments.
Kodiak’s ability to conduct business can be significantly impacted by changes in tariffs, changes or repeals of trade agreements, or the imposition of other trade restrictions or retaliatory actions imposed by various governments. For example, the Trump administration has announced certain changes, and has proposed additional changes, in trade policies, including the imposition of significant tariffs on imports from other countries. These actions have resulted in, and are expected to further result in, responsive actions by impacted countries. The imposition of certain tariffs, including the “reciprocal tariffs” announced by the Trump administration, have been introduced and paused on numerous occasions, pending negotiations with the relevant countries. As a result, there continues to be significant uncertainty regarding the extent and duration of applicable tariffs, and their impact on the global economy. While the U.S. oil and gas compression industry is largely domestic, should tariffs remain in place on certain other commodities, there is potential for adverse impact to operating results. Furthermore, any resulting economic downturns or market volatility, could have significant impacts on Kodiak’s financial results. Kodiak cannot predict what further action may be taken with respect to tariffs or trade relations between the U.S. and other governments, and any further changes in U.S. or international trade policy could have an adverse impact on Kodiak’s business.
Regulatory initiatives relating to the protection of endangered or threatened species in the United States could have an adverse impact on Kodiak’s and its customers’ ability to expand operations.
In the United States, the ESA restricts activities that may affect endangered or threatened species or their habitats. Similar protections are offered to migratory birds under the MBTA and bald and golden eagles under the BGEPA. To the extent species that are listed under the ESA or similar state or international laws, are protected under the MBTA or the BGEPA, or live in the areas where Kodiak or its customers operate, both Kodiak’s and Kodiak’s customers’ abilities to conduct or expand operations and construct facilities could be limited, or Kodiak or Kodiak’s customers could be forced to incur material additional costs.
The designation of previously unidentified endangered or threatened species or new critical or suitable habitat designations or additional interest in biodiversity and other nature-related matters could indirectly cause Kodiak to incur additional costs, cause Kodiak’s or its customers’ operations to become subject to operating restrictions or bans, and limit future development activity by Kodiak or its customers in affected areas.
Kodiak may be involved in legal proceedings that could result in substantial liabilities.
Kodiak is, from time to time, involved in various legal and other proceedings in the ordinary course of its business. Such legal proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted. Regardless of the outcome, such proceedings could have an adverse impact on Kodiak because of legal costs, diversion of management and other personnel and other factors. In addition, it is possible that a resolution of one or more such proceedings could result in liability, penalties or sanctions, as well as judgments, consent decrees or orders requiring a change in Kodiak’s business practices, which could materially and adversely affect Kodiak’s business, operating results and financial condition. Accruals for such liability, penalties or sanctions may be insufficient. Judgments and estimates to determine accruals or a range of losses related to legal and other proceedings could change from one period to the next, and such changes could be material.
Risks Related to Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Cybersecurity
Kodiak may be sued by third parties for infringement, misappropriation, dilution or other violation of their intellectual property or proprietary rights, any of which could adversely affect Kodiak’s business and results of operations.
Third parties may in the future assert that Kodiak has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated their intellectual property rights (“IPR”). Such claims, administrative proceedings and litigation may involve patent holding companies or other adverse IPR holders who have no relevant product revenue, and therefore Kodiak’s own IPR may provide little or no deterrence to these rights holders in bringing IPR claims against Kodiak. There may be IPR owned by third parties, including issued or pending patents and trademarks, that cover significant aspects of Kodiak’s technologies, content, branding or business methods, and Kodiak cannot assure that it is not infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating, and has not infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated, any third-party IPR or that Kodiak will not be held to have done so or be accused of doing so in the future. Kodiak expects that it may receive in the future notices that claim it allegedly has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated third parties’ IPR. Kodiak cannot assure you that it will be able to detect potential or actual misappropriation or infringement of its IPR or trade secrets. Even if Kodiak detects
misappropriation or infringement by a third-party, it cannot assure you that it will be able to enforce its rights at a reasonable cost, or at all.
Any claim that Kodiak has infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated IPR of third parties, with or without merit, and whether or not it results in litigation, is settled out of court or is determined in Kodiak’s favor, could be time-consuming and costly to address and resolve, and could divert the time and attention of management and technical personnel from Kodiak’s business. Furthermore, an adverse outcome of a dispute may result in an injunction and could require Kodiak to pay substantial monetary damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees, if Kodiak is found to have willfully infringed a third party’s IPR. Any settlement or adverse judgment resulting from such a claim could require Kodiak to enter into a licensing agreement to continue using the technology, content or other IPR that is the subject of the claim; restrict or prohibit Kodiak’s use of such technology, or other IPR; require Kodiak to expend significant resources to redesign Kodiak’s technology or solutions; and require Kodiak to indemnify third parties if they become subject to third- party claims relating to IPR that Kodiak licenses or otherwise provides to them, which could be costly. Royalty or licensing agreements, if required or desirable, may be unavailable on terms acceptable to Kodiak, or at all, and may require significant royalty payments and other expenditures. Kodiak may also be required to develop alternative non-infringing technology, which could require significant time and expense. There also can be no assurance that Kodiak would be able to develop or license suitable alternative technology or other IPR to permit Kodiak to continue offering the affected technology. If Kodiak cannot develop or license technology for any allegedly infringing aspect of its business, Kodiak would be forced to limit its service and may be unable to compete effectively. In addition, Kodiak’s rights to IPR and trade secrets may not prevent independent third-party development and commercialization of competing products or services. Any of these events could materially harm Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Kodiak may find it necessary or appropriate to initiate claims or litigation to enforce its IPR or determine the validity and scope of IPR claimed by others. In any lawsuit Kodiak brings to enforce its IPR, a court may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on grounds that Kodiak’s IPR do not cover the use or technology in question. Further, in such proceedings, the defendant could counterclaim that Kodiak’s IPR is invalid or unenforceable and the court may agree, in which case Kodiak could lose valuable IPR. Litigation is inherently uncertain and any litigation of this nature, regardless of outcome or merit, could result in substantial costs and diversion of management and technical resources, any of which could adversely affect Kodiak’s business and results of operations. If Kodiak fails to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce its intellectual property, its business and results of operations may be harmed.
Kodiak’s reliance on third-party components for use in its IT systems could result in delays in service or disrupt its business.
Components of Kodiak’s IT systems include various types of software and services licensed or provided from unaffiliated third parties, most of which Kodiak obtains on Software as a Service basis, without any ongoing support or maintenance obligations. Kodiak’s business would be disrupted if any of the software or services Kodiak obtains from others or functional equivalents thereof were either no longer available to Kodiak or no longer offered on commercially reasonable terms, or if they fail and Kodiak cannot obtain maintenance and support on reasonable terms. In either case, Kodiak could be required to either redesign its IT systems to function with software or services available from other parties or develop these components itself, which could result in increased costs and could result in delays in services. Furthermore, Kodiak might be forced to limit the features available in its IT system due to changes by its third-party software and service providers, or due to price increases by such vendors. In addition, if Kodiak fails to maintain or renegotiate any of these software or service agreements, Kodiak could face significant delays and diversion of resources in attempting to obtain and integrate functional equivalents.
Kodiak is subject to significant legal and reputational risks and expenses relating to the privacy, use and security of employee and customer information, which could negatively affect Kodiak's business, financial condition and results of operations.
Kodiak receives, maintains, and stores the non-public personal information (“PII”) of its employees, vendors, suppliers and customers. The sharing, use, disclosure and protection of this information are governed by the privacy and data security policies maintained by Kodiak. Moreover, there are federal and state laws and regulations regarding privacy and the storing, sharing, use, disclosure, and protection of PII and user data. Specifically, PII is increasingly subject to legislation and regulations in numerous jurisdictions, the intent of which is to protect the privacy of personal information that is collected, processed and transmitted in or from the governing jurisdiction. California enacted a privacy law (the “California Consumer Privacy Act” or “CCPA”) which limits how covered entities may collect and use PII, and which came into effect on January 1, 2020. In addition, California enacted, effective January 1, 2023, a privacy law, the California Privacy Rights Act (the “CPRA”), which significantly modifies the CCPA, including by expanding consumers’ rights with respect to certain PII and creating a new state agency to oversee implementation and enforcement efforts. Moreover, in 2025,
California approved amendments to the CCPA, which became effective January 1, 2026 that place additional requirements on covered entities, including annual cybersecurity audits, privacy risk assessments, and disclosure about companies’ use of artificial intelligence. Other states, including Colorado, Virginia, Connecticut, Texas, and Utah, have enacted privacy laws that similarly regulate covered entities’ collection and use of personal information. Kodiak could be adversely affected if the CCPA, CPRA and other states’ legislation or regulations require changes in Kodiak’s business practices or privacy policies, or if governing jurisdictions interpret or implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively affect Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Kodiak has experienced cybersecurity incidents or IT system disruptions in the past, and cybersecurity breaches or IT system disruptions may adversely affect Kodiak’s business in the future.
Kodiak relies on its IT systems to operate and record a significant portion of its business. This may include confidential information or PII belonging to Kodiak, Kodiak’s employees, customers, suppliers, or others. Similar to other companies, Kodiak’s systems and networks, and those of third parties with whom Kodiak does business, may be subject to cybersecurity breaches caused by, among other things, illegal hacking, insider threats, computer viruses, phishing, malware, ransomware, extortion, or acts of vandalism or terrorism, or those perpetrated by criminals or nation-state actors. Furthermore, Kodiak also faces increased cybersecurity risk as some of its personnel work remotely. Kodiak has experienced cyber incidents in the past, although none have been material or had a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business or financial condition. Kodiak may experience cybersecurity incidents and security breaches in the future. In addition to Kodiak’s own systems and networks, Kodiak uses third-party service providers to process certain data or information on Kodiak’s behalf. Due to applicable laws and regulations, Kodiak may be held responsible for cybersecurity incidents attributed to Kodiak’s service providers to the extent it relates to information Kodiak shares with them. Although Kodiak seeks service providers that implement and maintain reasonable security measures, Kodiak cannot control third parties and cannot guarantee that a security breach will not occur in their systems or networks.
Despite Kodiak’s efforts to refine its procedures, educate its employees, and implement tools and security measures designed to protect against such cybersecurity risks, there can be no assurance that these current or future measures will prevent unauthorized access or detect every type of attempt or attack. Kodiak’s potential future upgrades, refinements, tools and measures may not be completely effective or result in the anticipated improvements, if at all, and may cause disruptions in Kodiak’s IT systems. In addition, the techniques and sophistication used to conduct cyberattacks frequently change and the deployment of evolving artificial intelligence tools could be used to identify vulnerabilities and create more effective phishing attempts. Despite Kodiak’s efforts, a cyberattack or security breach could go undetected for an extended period of time, and the ensuing investigation of the incident would take time to complete. During that period, Kodiak would not necessarily know the impact to its IT systems, or the costs and actions required to fully remediate, and Kodiak’s initial remediation efforts may not be successful. Additionally, a cyberattack or security breach could be repeated before it is fully contained and remediated. A breach or failure of Kodiak’s systems or networks, critical third-party systems on which Kodiak relies, or those of Kodiak’s customers, vendors or suppliers, could result in an interruption in Kodiak’s operations, unplanned capital expenditures, unauthorized publication of Kodiak’s confidential business or proprietary information, unauthorized release of customer, employee or third-party data, theft or misappropriation of funds, violation of privacy or other laws, and exposure to litigation or indemnity claims including resulting from customer-imposed cybersecurity controls or other related contractual obligations. There could also be increased costs to detect, prevent, respond or recover from cybersecurity incidents that cannot be estimated or predicted and which may not be fully insured by Kodiak’s cyber risk insurance policy. For example, the SEC has adopted rules requiring the disclosure of cybersecurity incidents that we determine to be “material,” to be made within four business days of such determination, which can be complex, requiring a number of assumptions based on several factors. It is possible that the SEC may not agree with Kodiak’s determinations, which could result in fines, civil litigation or damage to our reputation. Any breach, or Kodiak’s delay or failure to make adequate or timely disclosures to the public, regulatory or law enforcement agencies or affected individuals following such an event, could have a material adverse effect on Kodiak’s business, reputation, financial position, results of operations and cash flows and cause reputational damage.
Kodiak’s ability to manage its business and monitor its results is highly dependent upon information and communication systems, and a failure of these systems or its enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system could disrupt its business and any intended benefits related to technology transformation projects may be negligible or nonexistent.
Kodiak continues to evaluate technology transformation projects and is dependent upon a variety of information and communication systems to operate its business, including its new ERP system that went live in August 2025. Any disruptions, delays or deficiencies in these systems, could adversely affect Kodiak’s ability to effectively operate and manage information. It is possible that Kodiak may not realize the anticipated benefits from these projects including the new ERP system. Failure to properly or adequately address these issues could impact Kodiak’s ability to perform necessary
business operations, which could adversely affect Kodiak’s reputation, competitive position, business, results of operations and financial condition.
Kodiak is subject to risks associated with disruptive technologies, including artificial intelligence.
Presently, Kodiak employs a limited array of artificial intelligence technology in our business, the use of which introduces us to certain risks including dependency on accurate intelligence performance, potential security breaches, challenges in regulatory compliance, ethical considerations, potential workforce disruption, the risk of intellectual property infringement, and other emerging technology risks. Kodiak is considering new ways it might further integrate artificial intelligence solutions into its information systems in the future, potentially assuming a more critical role in its operations over time. In addition, the artificial intelligence-related legal and regulatory landscape is constantly evolving and therefore remains uncertain and may be inconsistent from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Kodiak’s obligations to comply with the evolving legal and regulatory landscape could entail significant costs or limit its ability to incorporate certain artificial intelligence capabilities into its operations. Kodiak’s competitors or other entities may also integrate artificial intelligence into their information systems and business operations more swiftly or effectively than Kodiak, potentially impairing its competitive edge and negatively impacting its financial performance.
While Kodiak safeguards its assets, including intellectual property and sensitive information, Kodiak cannot ensure that its employees, contractors or other agents would adhere to those policies. Failure or perceived failure by us to address these risks adequately may negatively impact Kodiak’s operations, reputation and financial performance. Additionally, other unforeseen risks stemming from Kodiak’s use and development of artificial intelligence tools and technology may arise in the future that could adversely affect Kodiak’s business, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks Related to Kodiak’s Indebtedness
Kodiak’s substantial indebtedness could adversely affect its financial condition and impair Kodiak’s ability to operate its business.
Kodiak has a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2025, Kodiak’s total long-term debt was approximately $2.6 billion in aggregate principal amount, including $750.0 million principal amount of senior notes due 2029 which were issued February 2, 2024, $770.0 million principal amount of senior notes due 2033 which were issued September 5, 2025, and $630.0 million principal amount of senior notes due 2035 which were issued September 5, 2025.
Subject to the limits contained in the ABL Credit Agreement, Kodiak may be able to incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance working capital, capital expenditures, investments or acquisitions, dividends or for other purposes. If Kodiak does so, the risks related to its substantial indebtedness could intensify. Specifically, Kodiak’s substantial indebtedness could have important consequences, including the following:
•making it more difficult for Kodiak to satisfy its obligations with respect to its debt;
•limiting Kodiak’s ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general company requirements on favorable terms or at all;
•requiring a substantial portion of Kodiak’s cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, thereby reducing the amount of cash flows available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, future business opportunities and other general purposes;
•increasing Kodiak’s vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
•exposing Kodiak to the risk of increased interest rates as certain of its borrowings, including borrowings under the ABL Credit Agreement, are at variable rates of interest;
•limiting Kodiak’s flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which it competes;
•consequences relating to adverse borrowing base redeterminations;
•placing Kodiak at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors; and
•increasing Kodiak’s cost of borrowing.
In addition, Kodiak’s ability to refinance Kodiak’s indebtedness prior to maturity is dependent on the condition of the capital and credit markets and Kodiak’s financial condition. Kodiak can provide no assurance that it will be able to refinance its indebtedness or that any indebtedness incurred to refinance Kodiak’s indebtedness will be on comparable
terms. Furthermore, Kodiak’s debt is currently rated by major credit rating agencies. These ratings agencies regularly evaluate Kodiak and its credit ratings based on a number of quantitative and qualitative factors, including Kodiak’s financial strength and conditions affecting the natural gas compression services industry, generally. Kodiak’s credit ratings remain subject to change at any time, and it is possible that a ratings agency may take action to downgrade Kodiak’s credit ratings in the future. A downgrade of Kodiak’s credit ratings in the future could make parties less willing to do business with Kodiak and could negatively impact its ability to access the capital markets and increase the cost of any future debt funding Kodiak may obtain. See the section titled “Risk Factors—Risk Factors Related to Our Business and Our Industry—Kodiak may be unable to access the capital and credit markets or borrow on affordable terms to obtain additional capital that Kodiak may require” of this Annual Report for more information.
Kodiak may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy its obligations under its indebtedness, which may not be successful. Kodiak’s ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond Kodiak’s control.
Kodiak’s ability to make scheduled payments on or refinance its debt obligations depends on its financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond its control. Kodiak may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit it to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on its indebtedness.
If Kodiak’s cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund its debt service obligations, it could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures or to dispose of material assets or operations, seek additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance its indebtedness. Kodiak may not be able to effect any such alternative measures, if necessary, on commercially reasonable terms or at all and, even if successful, those alternative actions may not allow Kodiak to meet its scheduled debt service obligations. The ABL Credit Agreement and the indentures governing Kodiak’s senior notes restrict Kodiak’s ability to dispose of assets and use the proceeds from those dispositions and may also restrict Kodiak’s ability to raise debt or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due. Kodiak may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations then due.
In addition, Kodiak may in the future conduct its operations through subsidiaries, certain of which may not be guarantors of Kodiak’s indebtedness. Accordingly, repayment of Kodiak’s indebtedness may be dependent on the generation of cash flow by its subsidiaries and their ability to make such cash available to Kodiak, by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Unless they are guarantors of its indebtedness, Kodiak’s subsidiaries do not have any obligation to pay amounts due on Kodiak’s indebtedness or to make funds available for that purpose. Kodiak’s subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make distributions to enable Kodiak to make payments in respect of Kodiak’s indebtedness. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity, and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit Kodiak’s ability to obtain cash from its subsidiaries. While the ABL Credit Agreement and the indentures governing Kodiak’s senior notes limit the ability of Kodiak’s subsidiaries to incur consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends or make other intercompany payments to Kodiak, these limitations are subject to qualifications and exceptions. In the event that Kodiak does not receive distributions from its subsidiaries, Kodiak may be unable to make required principal and interest payments on its indebtedness.
Kodiak’s inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy its debt obligations, or to refinance its indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all, would materially and adversely affect Kodiak’s financial position and results of operations and Kodiak’s ability to satisfy its obligations under the ABL Facility. Kodiak’s ability to generate cash in the future is, to a significant extent, subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, tax, regulatory, environmental and other factors that are beyond Kodiak’s control.
If Kodiak cannot make scheduled payments on its debt, Kodiak will be in default and the lenders under the ABL Facility could terminate their commitments to loan money, the lenders could foreclose against the assets securing their borrowings, holders of the notes could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable and Kodiak could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
The terms of the ABL Credit Agreement and the indentures governing Kodiak’s senior notes restrict Kodiak’s current and future operations, particularly Kodiak's ability to respond to changes or to take certain actions.
The ABL Credit Agreement and the indentures governing Kodiak’s senior notes contain restrictive covenants (which contain a number of exceptions and qualifications that may be material) that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on Kodiak and may limit Kodiak’s ability to engage in acts that may be in Kodiak’s long-term best interest, including restrictions on Kodiak’s ability to:
•incur additional indebtedness and guarantee indebtedness;
•pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem equity interests;
•prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt;
•issue certain preferred units or similar equity securities;
•make loans and investments;
•sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets;
•incur liens;
•enter into transactions with affiliates;
•enter into agreements restricting Kodiak’s restricted subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends;
•enter into certain swap agreements;
•amend certain organizational documents;
•create certain subsidiaries;
•enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
•consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of Kodiak’s assets; and
•engage in certain other transactions without the prior consent of the lenders.
In addition, the ABL Credit Agreement contains certain operating and financial covenants and requires Kodiak to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy other financial condition tests. Kodiak’s ability to comply with those covenants and meet those financial ratios and tests can be affected by events beyond Kodiak’s control, and Kodiak may be unable to meet them.
A breach of the covenants or restrictions under the ABL Credit Agreement or the indentures governing Kodiak’s senior notes could result in an event of default under the applicable indebtedness. Such a default may allow the creditors to accelerate the related debt and may result in the acceleration of any other debt to which a cross-acceleration or cross-default provision applies. In addition, an event of default under the ABL Credit Agreement would permit the lenders under the ABL Facility to terminate all commitments to extend further credit under that facility. Furthermore, if Kodiak were unable to repay the amounts due and payable under the ABL Facility, those lenders could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure that indebtedness. In the event Kodiak’s lenders or note holders accelerate the repayment of Kodiak's borrowings, Kodiak and its subsidiaries may not have sufficient assets to repay that indebtedness. As a result of these restrictions, Kodiak may be:
•limited in how Kodiak conducts its business;
•unable to raise additional debt or equity financing to operate during general economic or business downturns; or
•unable to compete effectively or to take advantage of new business opportunities.
These restrictions may affect Kodiak’s ability to grow in accordance with Kodiak’s strategy. In addition, Kodiak’s financial results, Kodiak’s substantial indebtedness and Kodiak’s credit ratings could adversely affect the availability and terms of Kodiak’s financing.
Kodiak’s variable rate indebtedness subjects it to interest rate risk, which could cause its debt service obligations to increase significantly.
Borrowings under the ABL Credit Agreement are at variable rates of interest and expose Kodiak to interest rate risk. Despite the interest rate reductions from the Federal Reserve’s reduction in the target Fed Funds Rate in the third and fourth quarters of 2025, interest rates could be increased again in the future. If interest rates were to increase, Kodiak’s debt service obligations on the variable rate indebtedness would increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same, and Kodiak’s net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing Kodiak’s indebtedness, would correspondingly decrease. Kodiak has in the past entered into, and in the future may enter into, interest rate swaps that
involve the exchange of floating for fixed rate interest payments to reduce interest rate volatility. However, Kodiak may not maintain interest rate swaps with respect to all of Kodiak’s variable rate indebtedness, and any swaps it enters into may not fully mitigate Kodiak’s interest rate risk. Additionally, the enactment of derivatives legislation could have an adverse effect on Kodiak’s ability to use derivative instruments to reduce the effect of interest rate risk with our business.
Despite Kodiak’s current level of indebtedness, Kodiak and its subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further exacerbate the risks to Kodiak’s financial condition described above.
Kodiak and its subsidiaries may be able to incur significant additional indebtedness in the future. Although the ABL Credit Agreement and the indentures governing Kodiak’s senior notes contain restrictions on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to a number of qualifications and exceptions, and the additional indebtedness incurred in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. If Kodiak incurs any additional indebtedness that ranks equally to Kodiak’s outstanding debt obligations, subject to collateral arrangements, the holders of that debt will have priority over stockholders with respect to any proceeds distributed in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization, dissolution or other winding up of Kodiak’s business. This may have the effect of reducing the amount of proceeds paid to stockholders. These restrictions also will not prevent Kodiak from incurring obligations that do not constitute indebtedness. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, the ABL Facility provided for unused commitments of $1.5 billion. Because the borrowing capacity under the ABL Facility is determined on the basis of a fluctuating borrowing base comprised predominantly of the appraised value of our compression units, such amounts may not reflect future borrowing capacity. If new debt is added to Kodiak’s current debt levels, the related risks that Kodiak and the guarantors now face could intensify.
Risks Related to Owning Kodiak Common Stock
The Kodiak Charter and Kodiak Bylaws contain provisions that could delay, discourage or prevent a takeover attempt even if a takeover might be beneficial to Kodiak’s stockholders, and such provisions may adversely affect the market price of Kodiak Common Stock.
Provisions contained in the Kodiak Charter and Kodiak Bylaws could make it more difficult for a third-party to acquire Kodiak. The Kodiak Charter and Kodiak Bylaws also impose various procedural and other requirements, which could make it more difficult for stockholders to effect certain corporate actions. For example, the Kodiak Charter authorizes the Kodiak Board to determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of unissued series of preferred stock without any vote or action by Kodiak’s stockholders. Thus, the Kodiak Board can authorize and issue shares of preferred stock with voting or conversion rights that could adversely affect the voting or other rights of holders of Kodiak’s capital stock. These rights may have the effect of delaying or deterring a change of control of Kodiak. Additionally, for example, the Kodiak Bylaws (as defined below) (i) establish limitations on the removal of directors and on the ability of Kodiak’s stockholders to call special meetings, (ii) include advance notice requirements for nominations for election to the Kodiak Board and for proposing matters that can be acted upon at stockholder meetings, (iii) provide that the Kodiak Board is expressly authorized to adopt, or to alter or repeal, the Kodiak Bylaws, and (iv) provide for a classified Board, consisting of three classes of approximately equal size, each class serving staggered three-year terms, so that only approximately one-third of Kodiak’s directors are elected each year.
Kodiak cannot assure you that it will be able to pay dividends on the Kodiak Common Stock.
The Kodiak Board may elect to declare cash dividends on the Kodiak Common Stock, subject to its compliance with applicable law, and depending on, among other things, economic conditions, Kodiak’s financial condition, results of operations, projections, liquidity, earnings, legal requirements, and restrictions in the agreements governing Kodiak’s indebtedness (as further discussed below). The declaration and amount of any future dividends is subject to the discretion of the Kodiak Board and Kodiak has no obligation to pay any dividends at any time. Kodiak’s ability to pay dividends depends on Kodiak’s receipt of cash dividends from Kodiak’s operating subsidiaries, which may further restrict Kodiak’s ability to pay dividends as a result of the laws of their jurisdiction of organization, agreements of Kodiak’s subsidiaries or covenants under any existing and future outstanding indebtedness Kodiak or its subsidiaries incur. See Note 11. Debt and Credit Facilities to the consolidated financial statements included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Annual Report.
Additionally, Kodiak’s ABL Facility contains restrictions on the payment of dividends. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Description of Indebtedness” for more information regarding Kodiak’s restrictions under the ABL Facility.
Due to the foregoing, Kodiak cannot assure you that it will be able to pay a dividend in the future or continue to pay a dividend after it commences paying dividends.
The U.S. federal income tax treatment of distributions on common stock to a U.S. holder will depend upon Kodiak’s tax attributes and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in the common stock, which are not necessarily predictable and can change over time.
Distributions of cash or other property on common stock, if any, will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from Kodiak’s current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. To the extent those distributions exceed Kodiak’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distributions will be treated as a non-taxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. holder’s tax basis in its shares of common stock and thereafter as capital gain from the sale or exchange of such shares. Also, if any U.S. holder sells shares of common stock, the U.S. holder will recognize a gain or loss equal to the difference between the amount realized and the U.S. holder’s tax basis in such shares.
To the extent that the amount of Kodiak’s distributions is treated as a non-taxable return of capital as described above, such distribution will reduce the U.S. holder’s tax basis in its shares of common stock. Consequently, such excess distributions will result in a corresponding increase in the amount of gain, or a corresponding decrease in the amount of loss, recognized by the U.S. holder upon the sale of shares of common stock or subsequent distributions with respect to such shares. Additionally, with regard to U.S. corporate holders of common stock, to the extent that a distribution on common stock exceeds both Kodiak’s current and accumulated earnings and profits and such U.S. holder’s tax basis in such shares, such U.S. holders would be unable to utilize the corporate dividends-received deduction (to the extent it would otherwise be applicable to such U.S. holder) with respect to the gain resulting from such excess distribution.
Terms of subsequent financings may adversely impact stockholder equity.
If Kodiak raises more equity capital from the sale of Kodiak Common Stock, such equity could be offered at a price more favorable than the then current market price of Kodiak Common Stock. If Kodiak issues debt securities, the holders of the debt would have a claim to Kodiak’s assets that would be prior to the rights of stockholders until the debt is paid. Interest on these debt securities would increase costs and could negatively impact Kodiak’s operating results.
In accordance with Delaware law and the provisions of Kodiak’s certificate of incorporation and the Kodiak Stockholders’ Agreement, Kodiak may issue one or more classes or series of preferred stock that ranks senior in right of dividends, liquidation or voting to Kodiak Common Stock. Preferred stock may have such designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights, including preferences over Kodiak Common Stock respecting dividends and distributions, as the Kodiak Board may determine, and the issuance of preferred stock would dilute the ownership of Kodiak’s existing stockholders. The terms of one or more classes or series of preferred stock could adversely impact the voting power or value of Kodiak Common Stock. For example, Kodiak might grant holders of preferred stock the right to elect some number of Kodiak’s directors in all events or on the happening of specified events or the right to veto specified transactions. Similarly, the repurchase or redemption rights or liquidation preferences Kodiak might assign to holders of preferred stock could affect the residual value of the common stock. The terms of any series of preferred stock may also reduce or eliminate the amount of cash available for payment of dividends to Kodiak’s holders of common stock or subordinate the claims of Kodiak’s holders of common stock to Kodiak’s assets liquidation. Kodiak Common Stock will not be subject to redemption or sinking fund provisions.
General Risks
A financial crisis or deterioration in general economic, business or industry conditions could materially adversely affect Kodiak’s results of operations, financial condition and ability to pay dividends on Kodiak Common Stock.
Concerns over global economic conditions, rapid changes in trade policy, stock market volatility, energy costs, heightened geopolitical tensions, persistent inflationary pressures and uncertain U.S. Federal Reserve monetary policy actions, the availability and cost of credit, and slowing of economic growth in the United States have contributed and may continue to contribute to economic uncertainty and diminished expectations for the global economy.
Concerns about global economic growth can result in a significant adverse impact on global financial markets and commodity prices. In addition, a financial crisis may cause Kodiak to face limitations on its ability to borrow under its debt agreements, service its debt obligations, access the debt and equity capital markets and complete asset purchases or sales, may cause increased counterparty credit risk on its derivative instruments and may lead such counterparties to make Kodiak post collateral guaranteeing Kodiak’s performance.
Further, if there is a financial crisis or the economic climate in the United States or abroad deteriorates, worldwide demand for natural gas or oil could materially decrease, which would likely depress the level of production activity and result in a decline in the demand for Kodiak’s business and services and ultimately materially adversely impact its results of
operations and financial condition. If a material adverse change occurs in Kodiak’s business such that an event of default occurs under its debt agreements, the lenders under such agreements may be able to accelerate the maturity of its debt.
Inflation may adversely affect Kodiak by increasing costs beyond what it can recover through price increases and limit its ability to enter into future traditional debt financing.
Although inflation has moderated slightly, it has remained persistent in the United States in recent years due, in part, to supply chain issues, elevated energy prices, labor shortages and trade policies, among other factors. Persistent inflationary pressures have adversely affected Kodiak by increasing costs of critical components, equipment, labor and other services it may rely on, and continued inflationary pressures could prevent Kodiak from operating at capacity, decreasing its revenues or having an adverse effect on its profitability. In addition, inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates. Such higher interest rates may affect Kodiak’s ability to enter into future debt financing, as high inflation may result in an increase in cost to borrow.
Kodiak’s ability to use net operating losses (“NOLs”) to offset future income may be limited.
Kodiak’s ability to use any NOLs generated by it could be substantially limited if Kodiak were to experience an “ownership change” as defined under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). In general, an “ownership change” would occur if Kodiak’s “5-percent stockholders,” as defined under Section 382 of the Code, including certain groups of persons treated as “5-percent stockholders,” collectively increased their ownership in Kodiak by more than 50 percentage points over a rolling three-year period. An “ownership change” occurred in the year ending December 31, 2025, however, the resulting limitation had no impact on the Company’s expected realization of existing tax attributes. Additional ownership changes can occur as a result of a public offering of Kodiak Common Stock, as well as through secondary market purchases of Kodiak Common Stock and certain types of reorganization transactions. Such a limitation could, for any given year, have the effect of increasing the amount of Kodiak’s U.S. federal income tax liability, which would negatively impact its financial condition and the amount of after-tax cash available for distribution to Kodiak’s stockholders.
Tax legislation and administrative initiatives or challenges to Kodiak’s tax positions could adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition.
Kodiak operates in locations throughout the U.S. and, as a result, Kodiak is subject to the tax laws and regulations of U.S. federal, state and local governments. From time to time, various legislative or administrative initiatives may be proposed that could adversely affect Kodiak’s tax positions. There can be no assurance that Kodiak’s tax provision or tax payments will not be adversely affected by these initiatives. In addition, U.S. federal, state and local tax laws and regulations, including the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that was enacted in 2025, are extremely complex and subject to varying interpretations. There can be no assurance that Kodiak’s tax positions will not be challenged by relevant tax authorities or that it would be successful in any such challenge.