Item 1. Business
Company Overview
Enovix Corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “Enovix”) is a global high-performance battery company focused on designing, developing, manufacturing, and commercializing advanced Lithium-ion, or Li-ion, batteries, including proprietary silicon-anode architectures, for smartphones, smart eyewear, defense, industrial and emerging edge-AI applications. Our proprietary silicon-anode battery architecture enables higher energy density and performance relative to conventional battery cells, particularly in space-constrained devices. Our battery’s mechanical design, or “architecture,” allows us to use high performance chemistries while maintaining safety and reliability, supporting commercialization opportunities across various consumer and industrial markets.
Battery performance has become a critical constraint for modern electronic devices as they continue to incorporate slimmer designs with greater functionality, longer runtime, and higher power needs. Smartphones, smart eyewear, and defense and industrial systems, as well as emerging edge-AI applications, increasingly require batteries that can deliver higher energy density to support compact, always-on devices and advanced functionality – all without compromising safety, reliability, or manufacturability.
From inception, we have focused on developing a battery architecture that allows the use of 100% active silicon and no graphite in the battery’s anode, which is the negative electrode that stores lithium ions when a battery is charged. The battery industry has long recognized silicon’s potential to significantly increase energy density relative to graphite, the anode material used in most lithium-ion batteries today. Silicon can theoretically store more than twice as much lithium as graphite, but the battery industry has historically struggled to incorporate more than a small amount of silicon in the anode because it can swell and crack in conventional battery architectures, impacting safety, cycle life and overall performance. By contrast, our architecture is designed to accommodate silicon’s swelling and apply pressure that alleviates the cracking problem.
Over the last several years, we have continued to refine our go-to-market approach and focused on advancing customer programs and product validation for our next-generation batteries with a select group of customers and targeted applications. Our current AI-1TM battery platform is architected as a unified silicon-anode platform designed to address the most demanding requirements across high-performance consumer electronics and defense applications. We have initially prioritized smartphones as the lead qualification market because smartphones impose the most stringent battery requirements across energy density, fast charge, safety, and cycle life. We believe that demonstrated performance in smartphones will thereafter serve as a benchmark for the broader applicability of our AI-1TM battery architecture across other emerging, fast-growing markets, including smart eyewear and other AI-powered applications that require higher energy density in increasingly space-constrained designs.
Most recently, we partnered with a top-tier mobile original equipment manufacturer (“OEM”) on the development of our AI-1TM smartphone battery, which demonstrated high volumetric energy density and fast-charge performance verified by an independent testing laboratory. In the smart eyewear market, we also delivered over 1,000 AI-1TM battery packs to our lead customer under a supply agreement and samples to nine additional OEMs and original design manufacturers (“ODM”) as customer programs progressed toward production readiness.
Our History and Development
Enovix was established in 2006 based on the fundamental premise that meaningful advances in battery performance would require a reinvention of the battery’s architecture. This approach formed the technical foundation for our battery platform and has guided subsequent development and manufacturing decisions. We have devoted significant funds, time and resources to develop our proprietary architecture and the unique patterning and stacking assembly process for manufacturing our cells. This development was supported by partnerships and investments from several strategic participants in the solar and semiconductor industries, whose experience in precision manufacturing and scalable production informed our approach.
A significant step in our path to commercialization began in 2018, when we started providing sample batteries to customers to validate the performance of our products. Then in 2020, we began procuring equipment for our first production line (“Fab1”) at our headquarters in Silicon Valley and we recognized our first production revenue in the second quarter of 2022 from Fab1.
We expanded our manufacturing capability further in 2023 by identifying and building a facility for high-volume production in Malaysia (“Fab2”) and acquiring Routejade, Inc. (“Routejade”), a battery manufacturer in South Korea. The Routejade acquisition enabled us to vertically integrate electrode coating and battery pack manufacturing and expand our product offerings to include lithium-ion battery technologies, including silicon-doped graphite solutions, for defense and industrial applications. In 2025, we further expanded our manufacturing capabilities in South Korea through the acquisition of an adjacent battery cell manufacturing facility and related equipment from Solar Edge. These acquisitions have strengthened our manufacturing capabilities and allowed us to leverage expertise from personnel and facilities that have been operating for over 20 years and serving customers in demanding defense and industrial applications.
We have also continued to expand our global research and development (“R&D”) capabilities alongside our manufacturing footprint. In July 2023, we established a research and design center in Hyderabad, India to further support innovation and provide access to tap a deep pool of specialized engineering and technical talent in fields that are critical to our long-term success.
In 2024, we relocated our Fab1 R&D pilot line equipment from our Silicon Valley headquarters and officially opened our Fab2 production facility at the Penang Science Park in Malaysia. Following the opening of Fab2, our corporate functions, and certain sales, operations and engineering activities, are located at our U.S. headquarters, while our manufacturing and research and development activities are conducted primarily in Malaysia, South Korea and India. We now have three manufacturing lines at Fab2: the R&D focused pilot production line, the Agility line and the High-Volume Manufacturing (“HVM”) line. In October 2024, we commenced shipping battery cells from the Agility line and by the end of 2024, we had completed Site Acceptance Testing (“SAT”) for the Agility and HVM lines.
Following the opening of Fab2, our corporate functions, and certain sales, operations and engineering activities, and research and development activities are located at our U.S. headquarters. Our global manufacturing and research and development activities are conducted primarily in Malaysia, South Korea and India. As of December 28, 2025, we operate in one segment.
Throughout 2025, we focused on the development and launch of the AI-1TM platform, our Artificial Intelligence ClassTM batteries for the next generation of mobile smartphones, smart eyewear and other AI-enabled devices that require significantly higher total energy storage and power to perform AI functions locally. An independent testing laboratory confirmed in December 2025 that the AI-1TM smartphone battery delivered a volumetric energy density of 935Wh/L, exceeding the performance of a leading silicon-doped commercially available smartphone battery tested by 12%. We also advanced our manufacturing readiness and expanded capacity across our global footprint. Fab2 passed an ISO 9001 audit and successfully concluded initial audits with various customers. In defense and industrial markets, we continued to support growing customer demand through expanded production capabilities and increased shipments from our South Korea operations.
Following the opening of Fab2, our corporate functions, and certain sales, operations, engineering, and research and development activities are located at our U.S. headquarters. Our global manufacturing and research and development activities are conducted primarily in Malaysia, South Korea and India. As of December 28, 2025, we operate in one segment.
Industry Background
Battery Technology Innovation - Historical Overview
The first Li-ion battery for consumer electronics was developed by Sony to power its newly invented handheld video recorder in 1991, which needed smaller and lighter batteries with more energy than those available at the time. This battery architecture, sometimes referred to as a “Jelly Roll”, consists of an anode (A) in a long strip format, a long strip cathode (C) and two long strip separators (S), all on rolls, which are interleaved and then wound together into a Jelly Roll in this order: ASCSASCS.
The Jelly Roll is placed in a hermetic package and filled with electrolyte, an organic liquid through which the lithium ions repeatedly travel back and forth between the battery’s anode and the cathode. During charging, the lithium ions cycle from the cathode - the positive electrode, through tiny holes in the separator, and into the anode - the negative electrode. This basic construct of the Li-ion battery has remained unchanged for over 30 years.
Battery Technology Innovation - Our Approach
Historically, advancements in battery performance have been primarily driven by improvements in materials and manufacturing processes. While these efforts have led to significant increases in metrics such as energy density over time, the underlying architecture of conventional lithium-ion cells has remained largely unchanged. As the industry moves toward next generation materials, such as silicon anodes, limitations in traditional cell designs increasingly hinder further performance gains.
We believe that unlocking the full potential of higher-capacity materials requires a fundamentally different approach to battery cell architecture and assembly. Therefore, rather than focusing solely on the materials inside the battery, we have developed a novel 3D physical battery design that can both improve the packing efficiency of the active materials in the battery, as well as accommodate the use of a 100% active silicon anode.
Our founders leveraged their knowledge from over 25 years in the hard disk drive and semiconductor industries to develop a battery architecture based on stacking instead of rolling. In other words, rather than interleaving and winding long anode, cathode and separator strips into a roll, our founders proposed an architecture in which many short anodes and cathodes were stacked side by side, with a separator between each anode-cathode pair. This design improves packing efficiency and enables greater control over mechanical forces within the cell during charging and discharging. As a result, we believe our cell architecture is well-suited to accommodate the use of a silicon anode and therefore capitalize on the higher energy density it provides, as described further below.
Uniquely Enabling Silicon Anodes
Silicon has long been heralded as the next important anode material. Silicon anodes offer significantly more lithium per unit volume than graphite, the anode material used in most Li-ion batteries today. Energy density is calculated as the amount of energy a battery can deliver, measured in watt-hours, divided by its volume in liters, and is expressed as watt-hours per liter (“Wh/L”). Storage capacity, meanwhile, is measured in milliampere-hours (“mAh”) and we believe that our silicon-anode batteries also provide higher storage capacity compared to industry-standard batteries of similar size.
Silicon’s high energy density, however, creates four significant technical problems that must be solved:
•Formation expansion. “Formation” is the term for the first charging of the battery, when lithium moves from the cathode, through the separator, to the anode. When fully charged, a silicon electrode can grow by more than 60% in thickness, resulting in significant swelling that can physically damage the battery, causing failure.
•Formation efficiency. When first charged, a silicon anode can absorb and permanently trap a portion of the original lithium in the battery, reducing the battery’s overall capacity.
•Cycle swelling. A silicon anode will swell and shrink when the battery is charged and discharged, respectively, causing damage to both the package and the anode electrode, which can progressively increase in thickness, reduce in density, and lose contact to individual particles.
•Cycle life. Silicon particles can become electrically disconnected from the electrode when the silicon anode is in its shrunken state and can crack when the silicon anode is swollen, both of which can lower cycle life. In addition, when silicon particles become disconnected from the electrode, they are no longer able to accept lithium and neighboring particles must absorb the excess, causing over charging and further opportunities for physical damage.
Left unaddressed, these four problems have limited the practical application of silicon anodes in conventional lithium-ion battery cells. We believe our cell architecture uniquely solves these four technical problems to enable 100% active silicon anodes.
Problem 1 — Formation expansion
In a conventional Li-ion battery that uses a graphite anode, lithium atoms slip into the vacant spaces between the graphite layers during charging, resulting in very little graphite anode swelling during cycling. In contrast, with a silicon anode, lithium atoms form a lithium-silicon alloy that does not have such vacant spaces. While this process results in an increased ability to store lithium, it also causes significant expansion of the anode material during charging, creating
swelling pressure within the battery. To manage this force, we invented a stainless steel constraint system to surround the battery. We believe this constraint system limits the battery from swelling and growing in size.
Problem 2 — Formation Efficiency
The first time a Li-ion battery is charged or formed, some of the lithium is permanently trapped in undesired side-reactions and surface layers on the anode and cathode particles. These losses proportionately reduce the storage capacity of the battery by removing lithium.
During formation of a conventional Li-ion battery with a graphite anode, approximately 5% of the lithium from a lithium cobalt oxide cathode will get permanently trapped in the graphite anode, never to return to the cathode. A silicon anode, by contrast, can have a formation efficiency of roughly 85%, meaning that about 15% of the lithium is trapped in the silicon anode during formation and is no longer available for repeated cycling, reducing the battery’s capacity by approximately 10%.
Our cell architecture and assembly process are designed to address this problem through an added step called “pre-lithiation,” in which an additional thin lithium source is placed on top of the cell, within the package. This approach is intended to replenish the lithium lost during formation, as well as provide a lithium reservoir that supports improved capacity utilization and performance during the life of a battery.
Problems 3 & 4 — Swelling and Cycle Life
When conventional Li-ion batteries with graphite anodes are cycled (charged and discharged), they exhibit a modest amount of cyclic swelling (<10%). Silicon anodes, by contrast, can swell by 20%, or more. The continuous swelling and shrinking during charging and discharging can cause the anode electrode to progressively thicken and can induce electrical disconnection of anode particles, thus limiting cycle life below what is commercially viable in many applications. Additionally, any swelling in the cell over its lifetime must be accommodated by larger cavity volume, effectively reducing the practical energy density of the cell.
Our structural constraint system is designed to address this issue by applying uniform engineered pressure on the silicon particles within the anode, limiting their fracture and maintaining electrical contact between them for an extended number of cycles. Cycle swelling is thus kept to a relatively low percentage as compared to graphite / silicon blended electrodes and even 100% graphite anodes. By addressing swelling, the constraint system in our cell architecture is designed to enable silicon anodes to achieve a minimum of 1,000 complete charge/discharge cycles to 80% remaining capacity.
Key Markets that Can Benefit From Our Advanced Li-ion Battery
Mobile — The Li-ion battery was a key factor in the evolution of cell phones in that it provided the increase in energy density needed for cell phones to advance from their original “brick-size” into today’s sleek, sophisticated smartphone. Energy requirements continue to become more demanding as OEMs seek to launch heavy workload applications such as 4K and 8K video upload/download, multi-player gaming, enhanced camera capabilities and on-device AI. Providing a significant increase in battery energy density enables smartphone OEMs to continue improving user experience and functionality without negatively impacting battery life, all while keeping devices small enough to fit in a pocket.
IoT — The Internet-of-Things (“IoT”) market includes many types of devices powered by a Li-ion battery, including wearables, health/wellness devices, camera-based devices, power banks, location trackers, portable networking devices, augmented reality/virtual reality devices (“AR/VR”), and computing accessories, among others. Products in this market are often power budget constrained due to their relatively small size. There is also a constant appetite in this market for power-hungry features such as sensors, high-speed connectivity, and the increasing integration of AI and generative AI (“Gen AI”) capabilities. AI-enabled workloads and on-device Gen AI applications require significantly more power to deliver enhanced functionality and user experience. All of these features can be enabled by a higher energy density battery.
Computing — The Li-ion battery can also be credited for helping to usher in an era of portable PC computing. Users are now demanding higher performance from their portable PCs to accommodate everything from gaming to enterprise applications such as video conferencing. Ultimately users want “always on, all day” battery life, like that which they experience with their smartphones. Increased energy density is needed for this task, along with enabling more power-hungry features and the use of Gen AI applications.
Defense and Industrial — Rapid technological advancements across defense and industrial markets have been accelerating the need for batteries that combine high energy density, fast charging, and extended cycle life. As systems become more autonomous, compact, and power-intensive, applications such as aerial and subsea drones, soldier-worn systems, and other mission-critical equipment increasingly require lightweight designs and high-discharge solutions capable of rapid recharge and sustained deployment without compromising safety. At the same time, durability under demanding conditions is essential to reduce maintenance burdens and ensure consistent performance over time. Similar performance needs are expanding in industrial and specialized commercial uses, where reliability, safety, and consistent performance under harsh operating conditions are critical.
Electric Vehicles — Replacing internal combustion engine vehicles with electric vehicles (“EVs”) can reduce emissions that contribute to air pollution, but mass adoption of EVs hinges on lower cost vehicles and faster charging times that resemble the gas station experience of filling up quickly. The orientation of the electrodes in our battery allows for significantly higher thermal conductivity, which we believe enables a faster-charging EV battery.
Producing Our Battery
In addition to designing our batteries, we are developing the advanced manufacturing processes needed to produce them at scale and at competitive cost. We use conventional Li-ion battery cell manufacturing techniques for key steps such as electrode coating, cell packaging, testing and aging, while incorporating our own proprietary tools and processes in critical stages of cell assembly.
Standard Li-ion battery production involves: 1) electrode fabrication, 2) cell assembly and 3) battery packaging and formation.
Electrode Fabrication — Electrodes for conventional Li-ion batteries are produced by: 1) mixing anode and cathode materials into slurries, 2) coating them onto metal foil current collectors, 3) “calendering” (i.e. flattening) the coated foil, 4) slitting it into electrode sheets, and 5) rolling them up for packaging in cylindrical metal cans. This standard method has largely remained the same since it was developed over 30 years ago. In 2023, we acquired Routejade to bring this electrode fabrication capability in-house.
Cell Assembly — Traditional Li-ion cells are assembled using “Jelly Roll” or “Cut-and-Stack” configurations, depending on the intended use and size requirements. We have designed proprietary tools, produced for us by precision automated equipment suppliers, which incorporate patented methods and processes to achieve precise laser patterning and high-speed “Roll-to-Stack” cell assembly. Instead of cutting or punching electrodes and separators into sheets, an in-line laser is designed to precisely pattern these materials and feed them directly into a high-speed stacking tool. A stainless steel constraint is then applied as part of the assembly. This “Roll-to-Stack” cell assembly process supports compact cell formats and enables our silicon-anode architecture to increase Li-ion cell energy density and maintain relatively high cycle life.
Battery Packaging and Formation — Our battery uses the same battery packaging and formation process as a conventional Li-ion battery with the exception of the pre-lithiation process noted above. In our manufacturing process, we add an incremental lithium source during packaging which is then diffused into the cell during the formation process.
Our Products
Our product strategy is built on close collaboration with customers to understand their specific performance requirements such as energy density, cycle life, charge rate, and battery size. In 2023, we shifted from a horizontal business strategy, which focused on serving hundreds of customers with standard-sized batteries, to a vertical business strategy targeting a smaller group of large customers that require custom cells. We believe this transition provides the most efficient path to scale while optimizing battery performance for our target applications, including smartphones, smart eyewear, and other AI-enabled devices. We directly engage with OEMs and ODMs to fine-tune our battery technology for maximum performance within the constraints of their devices.
To achieve this, we develop battery "nodes" that share a common set of active materials and mechanical design, enabling us to produce batteries in various sizes. Our technology roadmap is built around a structured progression of these nodes, with each new generation delivering substantial improvement in energy density. By leveraging both material and design innovations, we aim to push the boundaries of Li-ion battery performance. Continuous innovation will allow
us to introduce higher-performing battery nodes over time, delivering meaningful performance gains for our customers ahead of market trends.
Over the last several years, we have advanced our silicon battery electrochemistry across multiple technology nodes and in 2025, we finalized and launched the AI-1™ product platform. The AI-1™ platform is designed to support AI-enabled smartphones and smart eyewear, as well as other emerging edge-AI devices, and is adaptable across multiple product variants and end markets. We believe the continued advancement of our battery technology roadmap positions us to deliver further improvements in energy density and performance in future product generations.
As part of the Routejade acquisition in 2023, we acquired the capability to produce conventional Li-ion batteries for wearables, medical devices, headsets, activity trackers, and other defense and industrial equipment in South Korea. Our patented encapsulation technology provides for design flexibility and structural safety, enabling high-energy-density Li-ion batteries primarily for IoT and wearable applications. We also now produce high-power batteries in our South Korean facility using Z-Folding technology, serving customers in the medical, industrial, aviation, and defense sectors. The three main product categories produced out of this facility consist of: (i) the Power Disk (“PD”) series made up of rechargeable coin cells commonly used in healthcare and IoT applications (ii) the Flexible Lithium-ion Polymer Battery (“FLPB”) and Asymmetric Designed Battery (“ASDB”), series utilize encapsulation technology — FLPB providing structural safety and ASDB maximizing design flexibility for compact devices—both primarily used in wearables and medical applications, and (iii) the Superior Lithium-ion Polymer Battery (“SLPB”) series, which features high C-Rate Z-Folding batteries optimized for high-power applications in the medical, industrial, aviation, and defense markets.
Our defense and industrial products include battery cells and packs designed for use in unmanned aerial systems, subsea equipment, public safety devices, and other mission-critical applications. These products are generally characterized by higher power requirements, ruggedized form factors, and customer-specific qualification standards. We supply both standard and customized solutions to customers in South Korea, North America, and Europe. One of our key strengths in this area is our ability to conduct pack assembly in-house, serving global end-user customers with a wide range of customized solutions to meet diverse market demands.
Our Competitive Strengths
100% Active Silicon Maximizes Anode Energy Density and Battery Capacity — Conventional Li-ion battery architecture only allows small amounts of silicon to be blended with graphite in the anode, limited by swelling. Our proprietary cell architecture enables use of silicon instead of graphite as the cycling material to achieve 100% active silicon anode that increases energy density and battery capacity.
Materials-agnostic architecture — We will continue to incorporate best-in-class materials into our cells as they are developed by the leading suppliers in the industry. Our architecture allows us to capitalize on innovation in the Li-ion materials supply chain while maintaining our advantage with a 100% active silicon anode.
Proprietary Manufacturing Process — In order to commercialize our unique architecture, we invented a customized manufacturing process that is not available “off-the-shelf” to conventional battery cell OEMs. In developing this process over multiple generations, we have accumulated significant intellectual property and trade secrets.
Full-Depth of Discharge Cycle Life — We have internally built and verified battery cells based on our proprietary cell architecture with an integrated structural constraint capable of 1,000 cycles, opening mass-market opportunities that were previously unobtainable with silicon anodes that failed to reach this number of cycles.
Architecture Enables Safety Innovation — Our architecture enables multiple parallel cell-to-busbar connections, which allow us in certain applications to apply a resistor at the busbar junction that can be utilized to regulate current flux in the event of an internal short. Our BrakeFlowTM system is designed to limit a shorted area from overheating and inhibits thermal runaway.
Architecture Enables Fast Charge — We demonstrated a 0-80% state-of-charge in 5.2 minutes and a 0-98% state-of-charge in just under 10 minutes on 0.27Ah test cells. This fast charging is enabled by the fact that heat only has to travel a small distance from the center of our electrodes to the stainless steel constraint on the exterior.
Customer Tested in Multiple Form Factors — We have sampled cells in several different sizes as part of product development programs. Applications cover a range of portable electronic products, including wearables, mobile handsets and laptop computers.
Home Grown IP — Unlike many advanced battery startups, which have licensed core technology from government or academic research laboratories, we have developed and own all our intellectual property. We received our first patents in 2011.
Supply Chain Geodiversity — Our manufacturing footprint in Korea and Malaysia aligns with increasing customer demand for geodiversity and supply chain resilience.
Research and Development
Our global R&D programs are focused on driving improvements in the performance and cost of our batteries and manufacturing equipment. Current R&D activities include the following:
Volumetric Energy Density and Capacity — Increase the energy density and capacity of batteries by increasing the percentage by volume of active cathode material inside the core, minimizing packaging overhead, maximizing the voltage of the cell, using cathode materials with higher specific capacity, and scaling the size of the battery while maintaining battery safety.
Gravimetric Energy Density — Increase the energy while reducing the relative weight for drone applications using the SLPB platform.
Cycle Life and Temperature — Improve the cycle life and high and low temperature performance of batteries by developing new electrodes, electrolyte chemistries, and cell designs.
Fast Charge — Enable battery charging at a higher rate for reduced charge time, while minimizing heating.
Safety — Improve battery safety by developing techniques to regulate current flux in the event of a battery short and limit overheating to inhibit thermal runaway.
Anodes and Cathodes — Develop batteries with next-generation anodes and cathodes that increase energy density.
Cost and Throughput — Develop toolsets and processes to produce batteries with lower cost and higher manufacturing throughput. Employ Design for Manufacturability (DFM) methodology to improve yield, cost, and throughput.
Mechanical Design — Improve energy density, cycle life, safety, manufacturability and yield.
EV Batteries — Develop batteries targeted to the unique requirements of the EV industry.
Manufacturing and Supply Chain
We historically manufactured batteries at our Fab1 manufacturing facility at our headquarters in Fremont, California. In 2023, we selected a site for Fab2 in Penang, Malaysia at the Penang Science Park. In the third quarter of 2023 we initiated a plan to locate all manufacturing operations in Asia to be closer to customers and suppliers, and transition Fab1 to focus on new product development. In October 2023, we completed the acquisition of Routejade, which has two factories in Nonsan City, South Korea, that house a total of four automated battery production lines and two electrode coating lines.
In the second quarter of 2024, we undertook a restructuring plan that included a relocation of Fab1 manufacturing to Malaysia. In the third quarter of 2024, we formally opened Fab2 in Penang, Malaysia and began operating our Agility line at this site. We subsequently commenced shipping battery cells to customers from the fully operational Agility line in Malaysia. In addition, we completed SAT for our second generation (“Gen2”) HVM line in late December 2024 and began sampling battery cells to smartphone customers.
During 2025, our Fab2 successfully passed an ISO 9001 audit, and we also completed initial customer audits at both Fab2 and our manufacturing facility in South Korea. We advanced manufacturing readiness by accelerating customer qualification activities and reducing custom product development timelines. In addition, we completed internal UN38.3 certification for our first AI-1 smartphone battery. In parallel with capacity expansion, we continued improving operational efficiency and production readiness across the facility. In South Korea, we integrated facilities and assets acquired during the second quarter of 2025, which expanded available floor space and increased coating equipment capacity. These operational improvements reflect our increasing focus on manufacturing execution as production programs move toward scaled commercialization.
Our manufacturing processes depend on raw materials such as lithium, silicon, graphite, nickel, cobalt, copper and other metals, the prices and availability of which are subject to significant volatility and uncertainty. We source materials for our batteries from third party suppliers globally. We have executed master supply agreements with many of our suppliers and have qualified second sources for certain of our battery materials. We seek second sources for materials that are high cost or where a risk to supply has been identified. On long-lead items, we intend to keep safety stock on hand to mitigate interruptions to supply.
Intellectual Property
We operate in an industry in which innovation, investment in new ideas and protection of our intellectual property rights are critical for success. We protect our technology through a variety of means, including through patent, trademark, copyright and trade secrets laws in the U.S. and similar laws in other countries, confidentiality agreements and other contractual arrangements. As of December 28, 2025, we had approximately: 75 issued U.S. patents, 153 issued foreign patents, 37 public and pending U.S. patent applications and 148 public and pending foreign patent applications.
We continually assess the need for patent protection for those aspects of our technology that we believe provide significant competitive advantages. A majority of our patents relate to battery architecture, secondary batteries, and related structures and materials.
With respect to proprietary know-how that is not patentable and processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to safeguard our interests. We believe that many elements of our secondary battery manufacturing processes involve proprietary know-how, technology or data that are not covered by patents or patent applications, including technical processes, test equipment designs, algorithms and procedures.
We own or have rights to various trademarks and service marks in the U.S. and in other countries, including Enovix and the Enovix design mark. We rely on both registration of our marks as well as common law protection where available.
All of our research and development personnel have entered into confidentiality and proprietary information agreements with us. These agreements address intellectual property protection and require our employees to assign to us all of the inventions, designs and technologies they develop during the course of employment with us.
We also require our customers and business partners to enter into confidentiality agreements before we disclose any sensitive aspects of our technology or business plans. As part of our overall strategy to protect our intellectual property, we may take legal actions to prevent third parties from infringing or misappropriating our intellectual property or from otherwise gaining access to our technology.
For more information regarding the risks related to our intellectual property, including the above referenced intellectual property proceedings, see Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Competition
The Li-ion battery supplier market is highly competitive, with both large incumbent suppliers and emerging new suppliers. Prospective competitors of ours include major manufacturers currently supplying the mobile device, IoT, defense, EV and battery energy storage systems (“BESS”) industries, and potential new entrants to the industry. Incumbent suppliers of Li-ion batteries include Amperex Technology Limited, Panasonic Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited, SK On Co., Ltd., BYD Company Limited, and LG-Energy Solution, Ltd. These companies supply conventional Li-ion batteries and, in some cases, Li-ion batteries with some silicon added to the anode. In addition, because of the importance of EVs, many automotive OEMs are researching and investing in advanced Li-ion battery efforts including battery development and production.
There are also several emerging companies investing in developing improvements to conventional Li-ion batteries or new technologies for Li-ion batteries, including silicon anodes and solid-state architecture. Some of these companies have developed relationships with incumbent battery suppliers, automotive OEMs and consumer electronics brands. These emerging companies are also exploring new chemistries for electrodes, electrolytes and additives.
Our ability to compete successfully will rely on factors both within and outside our control, including broader economic and industry trends. Factors within our control include driving competitive pricing, cost, energy density, safety and cycle life.
We believe that our ability to compete against this set of competitors will be driven by a number of factors, including product performance, cost, reliability, product roadmap, customer relationships and ability to scale manufacturing. We believe we will compete well with each of these factors based on advanced battery innovation to date and the ability to continue to design, develop and manufacture higher performing products for the customers served in our targeted markets.
Government Regulation and Compliance
Our business activities are global and are subject to various federal, state, local, and foreign laws, rules and regulations. For example, there are various government regulations pertaining to battery safety, transportation of batteries, use of batteries in cars, factory safety, and disposal of hazardous materials. In addition, substantially all of our import and export operations are subject to complex trade and customs laws, export controls, regulations and tax requirements such as sanctions orders or tariffs set by governments through mutual agreements or unilateral actions. Further, the countries into which our products are imported or are or will be manufactured may from time to time impose additional duties, tariffs or other restrictions on our imports or adversely modify existing restrictions. For example, recent tensions in U.S.-China trade relations, increased tariffs, and the possibility of additional tariffs, have created uncertainty and may negatively impact our key partners and suppliers. Changes in export controls, tax policy or trade regulations, the disallowance of tax deductions on imported merchandise, or the imposition of new tariffs on imported products, could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Privacy and Security Laws
In the ordinary course of our business, we may process personal or sensitive data. Accordingly, we are or may become subject to numerous data privacy and security obligations, including federal, state, local, and foreign laws, regulations, guidance, and industry standards related to data privacy, security, and protection. Such obligations may include, without limitation, the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act of 2003.
The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (collectively, “CCPA”) the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (“EU GDPR”), the EU GDPR as it forms part of United Kingdom (“UK”) law by virtue of section 3 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (“UK GDPR”), and the ePrivacy Directive. Furthermore, several states within the United States, including Colorado, Connecticut, Utah and Virginia, have enacted or proposed data privacy laws. Additionally, we are, or may become, subject to various U.S. federal and state consumer protection laws which require us to publish statements that accurately and fairly describe how we handle personal data and choices individuals may have about the way we handle their personal data.
The CCPA, UK GDPR, and EU GDPR are examples of the increasingly stringent and evolving regulatory frameworks related to personal data processing that may increase our compliance obligations and exposure for any noncompliance. For example, the CCPA imposes different obligations on covered businesses, including affording privacy rights to consumers, business representatives and employees who are California residents, requires covered businesses to provide specific disclosures to California residents in privacy notices, and provides such individuals with certain privacy rights to their personal data. The CCPA provides for administrative fines of up to $7,500 per violation and allows private litigants affected by certain data breaches to recover significant statutory damages.
Foreign data privacy and security laws (including but not limited to the EU GDPR and UK GDPR) impose significant and complex compliance obligations on entities that are subject to those laws. As one example, the EU GDPR applies to any company established in the EEA and to companies established outside the EEA that process personal data in connection with the offering of goods or services to data subjects in the EEA or the monitoring of the behavior of data subjects in the EEA. These obligations may include limiting personal data processing to only what is necessary for specified, explicit, and legitimate purposes; requiring a legal basis for personal data processing; requiring the appointment of a data protection officer in certain circumstances; increasing transparency obligations to data subjects; requiring data protection impact assessments in certain circumstances; limiting the collection and retention of personal data; increasing rights for data subjects; formalizing a heightened and codified standard of data subject consents; requiring the implementation and maintenance of technical and organizational safeguards for personal data; mandating notice of certain personal data breaches to the relevant supervisory authority(ies) and affected individuals; and mandating the appointment of representatives in the UK and/or the EU in certain circumstances. These developments further
complicate compliance efforts and increase legal risk and compliance costs for us and the third parties upon whom we rely.
Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could lead to regulatory investigations or actions, litigation, fines and penalties, disruptions of our business operations, reputational harm, loss of revenue or profits, loss of customers or sales, and other adverse business consequences.
The EU GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA, and other laws exemplify the obligations our business may have in responding to the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data. Our compliance costs and potential liability may increase with this scattered regulatory environment.
See the section titled “General Risk Factors” for additional information about the laws and regulations to which we are or may become subject and about the risks to our business associated with such laws and regulations.
Human Capital
Our human capital resources objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing and integrating our existing and new employees. The principal purposes of our equity incentive plans are to attract, retain and motivate our people through the granting of equity-based compensation awards, in order to increase stockholder value and our success by motivating such individuals to perform to the best of their abilities and achieve Enovix’s objectives. As of December 28, 2025, we employed approximately 664 full-time employees. Approximately 12% of our employees are located in the United States, and 88% of our employees are located in Asia Pacific, which includes South Korea, Malaysia, India and China.
Culture and Benefits
Our people are our greatest asset. We strive to live up to our Core Values every day: put customers first, innovate and move fast, deliver results and be direct and collaborative. Employees carry these Core Values with them on their access badge. Our Core Values are also displayed in conference rooms at Enovix offices globally and are reinforced in new hire training and rewards and recognition programs. We could not be where we are today without the dedication of our workforce, and we prioritize pathways for career development, employee feedback and competitive compensation and benefits packages. Our benefits program includes an employee stock purchase plan, paid time off, team building events and talent development opportunities. The program is designed, and periodically evaluated, to ensure we continue to motivate, strengthen and empower our workforce.
Employee Engagement and Training
We are engaged in community building by collaborating with local non-profit organizations in both the U.S. and Asia. We regularly engage with our employees via quarterly All Hands meetings, employee engagement surveys and through team-building events. These activities help advance employees’ cultural awareness and social responsibility and promote employee wellness and safety, as well as facilitate a collaborative and transparent working environment. We have engaged with top universities in Malaysia and in South Korea to build out a talent pipeline.
We have established a learning platform with both internal and external content to provide employees with on demand technical training programs and programs focused on developing soft skills. Our broader training program covers leadership topics, safety and compliance, processes and systems. The trainings are done online and in person, in brown bag formats and in more formal settings.
Building a company where everyone feels that they belong is a priority at Enovix. Our Core Values are reinforced in new hire training, employee engagement activities and everyday interactions.
Awards
In 2025, Enovix Korea was honored with the prestigious Best Workplaces of Korea for Job Creation award by the Ministry of Employment and Labor. This national certificate recognizes exemplary companies in quality job creation following comprehensive evaluations of workplace practices and company culture. This award highlights Enovix’s ongoing journey to foster a great workplace environment, reflecting its belief in prioritizing employee engagement, and the Company’s Core Values.
Corporate Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 3501 W. Warren Avenue, Fremont, CA 94538.
Available Information
We file or furnish periodic reports and amendments thereto, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. Copies of our SEC filings are made available, free of charge, on our investor relations website at https://ir.enovix.com as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such information with the SEC. We may also use our investor relations website to announce important business and financial information to investors, including webcasts, podcasts, and press releases. In addition, we use various social media channels, such as X, LinkedIn, YouTube, Instagram and Facebook as a means of communicating with investors, and for complying with our disclosure obligations under Regulation FD. Accordingly, investors should monitor these channels, in addition to following our SEC filings, webcasts, press releases and blogs published on our website. The information posted on our website and through various social media channels is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K or in any other filings we make with the SEC.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
RISK FACTORS
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. Before you make a decision to buy our securities, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including our financial statements and related notes and in the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” If any of the events or developments described below were to occur, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition could suffer materially, the trading price of our securities could decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial may also adversely affect our business.
You should not interpret our disclosure of any of the following risks to imply that such risks have not already materialized.
Risks Related to Our Manufacturing and Scale-Up
We will need to improve our energy density, cycle life, fast charging, capacity roll off and gassing metrics in order to stay ahead of competition over time, which is difficult, and we may not be able to do.
Our roadmap to improve our energy density, cycle life, fast charging, capacity roll off and gassing metrics requires us to implement higher energy density materials for both cathodes and anodes, and electrolyte and separator materials. To successfully use these materials, we will have to optimize our cell designs including, but not limited to formulations, thicknesses, geometries, materials, chemistries and manufacturing tolerances and techniques. It could take us longer than we anticipate to incorporate these new materials, or we might not be able to achieve certain cell performance specifications required by customers. Further, we will need to make improvements in our technology to achieve our energy density, cycle life, fast charge, capacity roll off and gassing metrics improvement roadmap. These improvements may not be possible, or could take longer, or be more difficult than forecasted. If we are unable to improve our packaging technology, this could reduce the performance of our products and delay the availability of products to customers, which would negatively impact our competitive potential.
We rely on a new and complex manufacturing process for our operations, and achieving volume production involves a significant degree of risk and uncertainty in terms of operational performance such as yield and costs.
Although we have developed our lithium-ion battery technology, we rely heavily on a new and complex manufacturing process for the production of our lithium-ion battery cells, which is not currently operating at scale. To meet our projected future demand, we need to increase our manufacturing throughput and yield metrics. We expect that meeting our goals to improve throughput and yield will be a multi-quarter or potentially longer endeavor. We have in the past, and may in the future, experience delays in meeting these goals. We have more than one solution to improve manufacturing throughput and yield metrics, and it is uncertain which solution will be optimized for commercial scale.
We use numerous vendors for subcomponents of the battery; changes in materials or vendor selection, or the failure of our solutions to improve yield, could negatively impact our ability to meet our throughput and yield metric goals.
The work required to develop these manufacturing processes and integrate equipment into the production of our lithium-ion battery cells, including achieving our goals for throughput and yield, is time intensive and requires us to work closely with numerous equipment and tooling providers to ensure that the equipment works properly for our unique battery technology. The integration of new equipment into our production process involves a significant degree of uncertainty and risk, and we have not in the past and may not in the future be able to achieve our goals for throughput and yield. Further, integration work may result in the delay in the scaling up of production or result in additional costs to our battery cells, particularly if we encounter issues with performance or if we are unable to customize products for certain of our customers. Certain customers will likely require several months or longer to complete technology qualification before determining whether to accept a product that is manufactured at high volume, if at all. In addition, even if we are able to achieve volume production for the existing uses of our batteries, we may face challenges relating to the scaling up of production for new uses of our batteries, including in the EV market and the market for AI-powered devices.
Our large-scale Gen2 manufacturing lines require large-scale machinery. We need one or more tooling vendors to produce custom products for our customers. Such machinery or tooling equipment has in the past suffered, and may in the future suffer, unexpected malfunctions from time to time and will require repairs and spare parts to resume operations, which may not be available when needed. Our tooling vendors may be new to the battery space or to producing silicon batteries and it may take longer to qualify and effectively utilize such tooling to make custom batteries. Further, our tooling may not be adequate for the various products our customers may demand and we may have to procure new or additional tooling to make products suitable for the market.
In addition, unexpected malfunctions of our production equipment have in the past significantly affected, and may in the future significantly affect, the intended operational efficiency. Qualified labor is needed to remedy any such equipment malfunction, which may not be readily available. Because this equipment has not previously been used to build lithium-ion battery cells, the operational performance and costs associated with the maintenance and repair of this equipment can be difficult to predict and may be influenced by factors outside of our control, such as, but not limited to, (i) failures by suppliers to deliver necessary components of our products in a timely manner and at prices and volumes acceptable to us, (ii) environmental hazards and remediation, (iii) difficulty or delays in obtaining governmental permits, (iv) damages or defects in systems, (v) cybersecurity intrusion and related disruptions; and (vi) industrial accidents, fires, seismic activity and other natural disasters. Further, we have in the past experienced power outages at our facilities and may again in the future. If outages are more frequent or longer in duration than expected, it could impact our ability to manufacture batteries in a timely manner. If our production equipment does not achieve the projected levels of its output or our production equipment becomes obsolete, it may be necessary to record an impairment charge to reduce the carrying value of our machinery and equipment, which would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
Even if we are able to successfully complete development of and modify, as necessary, this new and complex manufacturing process, we may not be able to produce our lithium-ion batteries in commercial volumes in a cost-effective manner.
If we cannot successfully scale our manufacturing facilities to produce our lithium-ion battery cell in sufficient quantities to meet expected demand, improve productivity and bring additional facilities online, we may be unable to achieve our profitability targets, and our business will be negatively impacted and could fail.
In 2024, we relocated our Fab1 manufacturing operations from Fremont, California to Fab2 in Malaysia. We also completed site acceptance testing (“SAT”) and began production of batteries on our Agility line and completed factory acceptance testing (“FAT”), and SAT, for our High-Volume Manufacturing (“HVM”) line in Malaysia. However, our profitability targets rely on our ability to aggressively reduce the capital costs of our production lines and implement productivity improvements. If such efficiency gains are unsuccessful, we may be unable to achieve our target margin and profitability goals. We expect that our current manufacturing lines will be sufficient to produce batteries on a commercial scale, but not in high enough volumes to meet our long-term expected customer demand. Therefore, we are working to bring additional facilities online at Fab2 and in Korea, including evaluating additional or alternative manufacturing locations, as well as further refine our approach to improve yields over time.
To the extent we continue to experience manufacturing challenges, which can impact our ability to improve yields, we may have difficulty accepting additional customer demand due to capacity constraints, which could delay our growth. Furthermore, our current manufacturing operations in Malaysia are conducted in facilities that we are leasing from a third party, which may subject us to risks associated with renewals and potentially increased costs associated with such renewals. If we are unable to successfully build, manage, renew or expand our existing manufacturing lines and any additional lines we may establish, or otherwise further refine our approach to improve yields, our prospects, financial condition and results of operations will be negatively impacted and our business could fail.
Even if we overcome the manufacturing challenges and achieve volume production of our lithium-ion battery, if the cost, performance characteristics or other specifications of the battery fall short of our or our customers’ expectations and targets, our sales, product pricing and margins would likely be adversely affected. Our long-term target economics at scale assume we are able to obtain certain pricing levels for our batteries. If these assumptions are incorrect and/or customer demand is lower than expected, we may fail to achieve our target revenue and profitability goals and our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
We may be unable to adequately control the costs associated with our operations and the components necessary to build our lithium-ion battery cells.
We require significant capital to develop and grow our business and expect to incur significant expenses, including those relating to raw material procurement, leases, sales and distribution as we build our brand and market our batteries, and general and administrative costs as we scale our operations. Our ability to become profitable in the future will not only depend on our ability to successfully market our lithium-ion batteries and services, but also to control our costs. A large fraction of the cost of our battery, like most commercial batteries, is driven by the cost of component materials, such as anode and cathode powder, separator, pouch material, and current collectors. It also includes machined parts that are part of the package. Our cost reduction initiatives are based on a variety of factors, including extensive discussions with vendors, customers, industry analysts and independent research; however, an assumed cost reduction over time may be inaccurate if our forecasted demand does not materialize as planned. These estimates may prove inaccurate, which would adversely affect the expected profitability margins for our batteries.
If we are unable to cost-efficiently manufacture, market, sell and distribute our lithium-ion batteries and services, our margins, profitability and prospects would be materially and adversely affected. We have not yet produced any lithium-ion battery cells at significant volume, and our forecasted cost advantage for the production of these cells at scale, compared to conventional lithium-ion cells, will require us to achieve certain goals in connection with rates of throughput, use of electricity and consumables, yield and rate of automation demonstrated for mature battery, and battery material and manufacturing processes, that we have not yet achieved and may not achieve in the future. We intend to improve productivity and reduce the costs of our production lines compared to the first line we built. In addition, we are planning continuous productivity improvements going forward. If we are unable to achieve these targeted rates or productivity improvements, our business will be adversely impacted.
Additionally, we have previously undertaken restructuring plans to manage our operating expenses and we may do so again in the future. Most recently, we completed a restructuring in 2024 designed to reduce our operating costs and support our strategic goals. As part of the restructuring plan, we relocated our manufacturing operations from our Fab1 facility in Fremont, California to Malaysia, resulting in a plan of workforce reduction in the U.S., as well as significant restructuring charges associated with equipment disposals as part of the relocation. Thus, we may in the future incur material costs and charges in connection with restructuring plans and initiatives and there can be no assurance that any such plans and initiatives will be successful, or that we will be able to adequately manage our operating expenses. Any restructuring plans may adversely affect our operations and ability to recruit and retain skilled and motivated personnel, result in a loss of continuity and accumulated knowledge, or inefficiency during the transition period, and will likely require a significant amount of employees’ time and focus, all of which may divert attention away from operating and growing our business. If we fail to achieve some or all of the expected benefits of any restructuring plans, which may be impacted by factors outside of our control, our business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely affected. For more information, see Note 15 “Restructuring Costs” of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report.
We rely on a manufacturing agreement with a Malaysia-based company for some of the facilities, procurement, and personnel needs of our operations. Changes to our relationship with such third-party contract manufacturer, expected or unexpected, may result in delays or disruptions that could harm our business.
In July 2023, we entered into a 10-year manufacturing agreement (as amended, the “YBS Agreement”) with YBS International Berhad (“YBS”), a Malaysia-based investment holding company with operational segments including electronic manufacturing and assembly, high-precision engineering, precision machining and stamping, among others. If we are able to overcome the challenges in designing and refining our manufacturing process, we expect to operate multiple manufacturing lines, with YBS providing certain facility, staffing, and procurement support services, to meet our expected customer demands.
In October 2024, we entered into an amendment to the YBS Agreement, which modified certain payment terms and responsibilities of the parties. Pricing under the YBS Agreement is set on a cost-plus basis and we are subject to a minimum purchase commitment. We are obligated to pay a certain threshold amount each month over the term of the YBS Agreement depending on the level of orders we make to YBS for manufacturing. The ten-year term of the YBS Agreement expires in July 2033, subject to customary termination provisions.
Our manufacturing arrangement with YBS creates risks due to our reliance on YBS for various aspects of our manufacturing operations, including staffing, procurement and certain support services. Further, manufacturing in Malaysia is subject to possible disruptions due to power outages, equipment malfunction and failures, and supply chain disruptions relating to raw materials or components, among others. Our manufacturing operations may also be adversely affected by natural disasters and climate change. Other events, including political or public health crises, may affect our production capabilities or that of our suppliers, including lack of supplies. As a result, in addition to disruptions to operations, our insurance premiums may increase, or we may not be able to fully recover any sustained losses through insurance. If this manufacturing arrangement does not perform as expected, it may materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and prospects.
In addition, the YBS Agreement exposes us to risks because certain operational aspects are managed by YBS, which may reduce our direct control over the management of manufacturing processes, capacity constraints, delivery timetables, product quality assurance and costs. If we fail to effectively manage our relationship with YBS; if YBS is unable to meet our manufacturing requirements in a timely manner; or if we experience delays, disruptions or quality control problems, it may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operations in international markets, including our manufacturing operations, expose us to operational, financial and regulatory risks, as well as risks relating to geopolitical tensions and conflicts, including changes to trade policies and regulations.
Over the last three years, we have expanded our global footprint through acquisitions as well as a restructuring of our manufacturing operations. Namely, in South Korea, we acquired a battery manufacturer in 2023, Routejade, as well as a second manufacturing facility and certain other related assets in 2025. During this time, we have also established a research and development center in Hyderabad, India, which supports the product and manufacturing teams in our other locations, and relocated all of our manufacturing activities from Fremont, California to Malaysia, as well as established a subsidiary in Shenzhen, China. Following the shift of our manufacturing facilities to Malaysia and a reduction in force that primarily affected our U.S. operations, a higher percentage of our employees and a significant portion of our business operations are located overseas, while our leadership team is primarily located in the U.S. Additionally, relationships with customers and potential customers outside of the U.S. accounted for a significant portion of our revenues during 2025.
While we are continuing to adapt to and develop strategies to address international markets and to manage our international activities and geographically diverse workforce, there is no guarantee that such efforts will have the desired effect. We have in the past and may continue to experience operational challenges associated with global business operations and a globally dispersed workforce, such as coordinating activities across multiple time zones and cultures and maintaining consistent operations standards across diverse locations. In addition, effective collaboration between R&D and manufacturing teams located overseas, and other parts of the organization, may be hindered by distance, language and cultural differences, which may have a negative impact on product innovation and overall operational efficacy.
We expect that our international activities will continue to grow for the foreseeable future as we continue to pursue opportunities in existing and new international markets, which will require significant dedication of management attention and financial resources.
As a result of having significant international operations, including our manufacturing operations, we are subject to a number of risks, including:
• burdens of complying with a wide variety of laws and regulations;
• unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
• exposure to political or economic instability and general economic fluctuations in the countries we operate;
• changes in currency exchange rates;
• changes in diplomatic and trade relationships;
• trade restrictions;
• terrorist activities, natural disasters, epidemics, pandemics and other outbreaks, including the regional or local impacts of any such activity;
• political, economic and social instability, war or armed conflict;
• differing employment practices and laws and labor disruptions, including strikes and other work stoppages, strains on the available labor pool, labor unrest, changes in labor costs and other employment dynamics;
• the imposition of government controls;
• lesser degrees of intellectual property protection;
• tariffs and customs duties, or other barriers to some international markets, and the classifications of our goods by applicable governmental bodies; and
• a legal system subject to undue influence or corruption.
The current geopolitical climate and certain actions by the U.S. administration have created uncertainty regarding and fluctuations in trade policies, and our operations and business are subject to these uncertainties given the extent of our international operations and dependencies on international supply chains and access to international employees. These factors and risks could negatively affect our international business operations, increase the difficulty or cost of selling our products in (or restrict our access to) certain foreign markets, divert management’s attention, and increase our costs, which would adversely affect our business, operating results, growth prospects and financial condition.
Changes in global trade policies, tariffs, export controls and other cross-border restrictions could materially adversely affect our revenues, operating results and ability to source materials and equipment.
Due to our international operations, we face heightened risks relating to trade policies and disputes that result in increased tariffs, trade barriers, retaliatory tariffs and other trade restrictions and protectionist measures, including export controls, licensing requirements and other regulatory restrictions on cross-border trade. For example, the United States has recently imposed or proposed significant new tariffs on a large number of products and components imported into the U.S. and could propose additional tariffs or increases to those already in place. It is unknown whether and to what extent these tariffs will remain in place or whether other new laws or regulations will be adopted. While there is currently a trade pact with China, additional or new tariffs may be imposed reciprocally. It is difficult to predict what further trade-related actions governments may take, including the extent of retaliatory actions, and our business may be negatively impacted if we are unable to quickly and effectively react to any such actions.
The overall tension in U.S.-China trade relations and the possibility of additional tariffs has created uncertainty in our industry and may negatively affect certain of our suppliers, as well as our ability to source components or raw materials. In particular, our facilities are located in Malaysia, India and South Korea and our products require materials
and equipment manufactured outside these countries, including China. If such materials and equipment do not fall under any exemption to the newly imposed tariffs or reciprocal tariffs, or are subject to other trade barriers or restrictions, such as China’s Regulation on Export Control of Dual-Use Items, it could materially impact our ability to obtain materials and equipment, or effective alternative sources of such items, on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Due to the broad uncertainty regarding the timing, content and extent of global trade policy changes in the U.S. and internationally, we cannot accurately predict the full extent to which these changes will affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. We believe the direct impact of tariffs on our business is currently manageable given the location of our international operations; however, the indirect effects of U.S. tariffs on products containing our batteries could be significant. Any failure by us to adapt quickly to changes in global trade policy could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on third-party suppliers for critical components and equipment, and disruptions in these relationships could delay production and harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
We rely on third-party suppliers for components and equipment necessary to develop and manufacture our lithium-ion batteries, including key supplies such as anode, cathode, electrolyte and separator materials, as well as specialized manufacturing equipment. If we are unable to enter into or maintain supply arrangements on acceptable terms, if our suppliers experience delays or capacity constraints, or if they fail to meet our quality, cost or volume requirements, we could experience delays in product development and manufacturing timelines.
The unavailability of key components or equipment could result in delays in constructing manufacturing equipment, idle manufacturing facilities, product design changes and loss of access to important technology and tools for producing and supporting our lithium-ion batteries production, as well as reduced manufacturing capacity. We have in the past experienced, and may continue to experience, suppliers that are unwilling or unable to meet our timing, cost, quality or volume needs, which may require us to identify alternative suppliers, potentially at higher cost or with additional delays. There can be no assurance that alternative sources will be available in a timely manner or at all.
In addition, our suppliers may experience financial distress or business continuity issues, including bankruptcy or receivership, which could further disrupt our production timelines and our ability to configure equipment to operate at target performance levels. For example, one of our equipment suppliers went into receivership in the first half of 2024. To the extent our equipment suppliers experience business continuity challenges in the future, it may disrupt our production timelines, negatively impact our ability to successfully configure the equipment to run at its target performance and limit our ability to operate such equipment. Any failure by our suppliers to deliver critical components or equipment in a timely and reliable manner, at the cost and quality we require, could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Increases in raw material costs and supply disruptions resulting from global market and geopolitical conditions could increase our product costs and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our manufacturing processes depend on raw materials such as lithium, silicon, graphite, nickel, cobalt, copper and other metals, the prices and availability of which are subject to significant volatility and uncertainty. These materials are affected by global market conditions and supply and demand dynamics, including as a result of increased global production of EVs and energy storage products, inflationary pressures, supply chain disruptions, pandemics or other public health crises, and war or other armed conflicts. We have also experienced increased logistics and freight costs as a result of supply chain challenges in the past, and we may not be able to negotiate purchase agreements and delivery lead-times for such materials on advantageous terms in the future.
Reduced availability of these materials or significant price increases could raise the cost of our components and consequently, the cost of our products. We may be unable to negotiate favorable supply terms or pass through increased costs to customers, which could negatively affect our margins and operating results. In addition, certain materials and components may be produced internally or treated as proprietary by large battery manufacturers, limiting their availability to third parties.
Finally, global economic, political and regulatory developments may further constrain the availability of these raw materials or increase procurement and logistics costs. Because our facilities are located in Malaysia, India and South Korea and our products depend on materials and equipment sourced from multiple countries, disruptions affecting upstream suppliers or transportation networks could have a disproportionate impact on our cost structure. Any disruption
in the supply or significant increase in the cost of raw materials or logistics could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Risks Related to Our Customers
Lengthy sales cycles, unpredictable safety risks and certain provisions of defense and other customer contracts may negatively impact our ability to maintain and grow our customer base, which could adversely affect our business and future prospects.
Our customers’ products are typically on yearly or longer refresh cycles. Due to the lengthy sales cycles, if we miss qualification timing by even a small amount, the impact to our production schedule, revenue and profits could be large and may mean that our guidance or revenue forecasts for fiscal year do not materialize as expected. While we intend to meet all qualification criteria, some field reliability risks remain such as cycle life, long-term high-temperature storage capacity and swelling, among others. Batteries are known in the market to have historically faced risks associated with safety, and therefore customers can be reluctant to take risks on new battery technologies. Since new battery technologies have not been widely adopted by customers in the battery market, it may be difficult for us to overcome customer risk objections. If unanticipated product safety problems arise, it may raise warranty costs and adversely affect revenue and profit.
Our sales to defense customers often involve standard form contracts, which may not be subject to negotiation. In particular, certain of these contracts involve unlimited damages provisions that could result in large-scale liabilities.
If our batteries fail to perform as expected, our ability to develop, market and sell our batteries could be harmed.
We have experienced a limited number of returns of batteries that have failed to perform as expected. As commercial production of our lithium-ion battery cells increases, our batteries have in the past and may in the future contain defects in design and manufacture that may cause them to not perform as expected or that may require repairs, recalls and design changes. Our batteries are inherently complex and incorporate technology and components that have not been used for other applications and that may contain defects and errors, particularly when first introduced. We have a limited frame of reference from which to evaluate the long-term performance of our lithium-ion batteries. There can be no assurance that we will be able to detect and fix any defects in our lithium-ion batteries prior to the sale to potential consumers. If our batteries fail to perform as expected, we could lose design wins and customers may delay deliveries, terminate further orders or initiate product recalls, each of which could adversely affect our sales and brand and could adversely affect our business, prospects and results of operations.
Our cell architecture is different than other batteries and may behave differently in certain customer use applications that we have not evaluated. This could limit our ability to deliver to certain applications, including, but not limited to smartphones, IoT, smart eyewear, action cameras, portable gaming and smartwatches, and other AI-powered devices. In addition, we have limited historical data on the performance and reliability of our batteries over time. If our batteries fail unexpectedly in the field, such failures could result in significant warranty costs and/or reputational harm. For example, the electrodes and separator structure of our battery are different from traditional lithium-ion batteries and therefore could be susceptible to different and unknown failure modes, leading our batteries to fail and cause a safety event in the field, which could further result in the failure of our end customers’ products as well as the loss of life or property. Any safety event in the field, but in particular, one in which the end product failure results in significant loss, could result in severe financial penalties for us, including the loss of revenue, cancellation of supply contracts and the inability to win new business due to the reputational harm that results. In addition, some of our supply agreements require us to fund some or all of the cost of a recall and replacement of end products affected by our batteries.
We have significant customer concentration in key market sectors and dependence on these customers creates a risk to our business and financial condition.
We face risks associated with customer concentration, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and business prospects. Our current revenue stream is derived largely from a limited number of key customers, particularly those in the defense sector. One customer, a defense subcontractor in South Korea, accounted for the majority of our total revenue for the fiscal year 2025. As a result of this customer concentration, our financial performance is highly sensitive to the retention, performance, and ongoing demand from our significant customers. The loss, or material reduction in business, from any significant customer, whether due to strategic shifts, sourcing decisions, financial distress, bankruptcy, or other factors, could result in a sudden and material decline in our revenue and cash flows. Moreover, the terms and conditions of contracts with these key customers may not provide us with sufficient
protection against fluctuations in demand, changes in pricing, or competitive pressures, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
In addition, we rely on a single supplier for components to manufacture products for our defense customers and any disruption in the supply of components would negatively impact our ability to perform under such contracts and significantly negatively impact our revenues and profit margin. Should we have to replace our single supplier, or renegotiate the terms of our current supplier agreement, we may be unable to establish or obtain competitively favorable terms, which would also negatively impact our revenues and profit margin under our defense customer contracts. Furthermore, government contracts associated with customers in the defense sector are often subject to a variety of complex procurement laws and regulations relating to the award, administration and performance of those contracts. Changes in government procurement policy, priorities, regulations, technology initiatives and/or technical and compliance requirements may negatively impact our ability to continue to earn revenue from government and defense customers. Furthermore, government entities may implement policies that restrict or negatively affect our ability to sell our products and services.
Lack of diversification increases our susceptibility to adverse events affecting our key customers. For example, the expiration, termination, or renegotiation of contracts, whether from the integration of these customers as a result of the acquisition or otherwise, could lead to uncertainty and volatility in our revenue stream. While we may seek to mitigate the risks associated with customer concentration through diversification efforts, expanded market reach, and enhanced customer relationship management, there can be no assurance that such measures will be successful in offsetting the potential adverse impacts of customer concentration. The loss of a significant customer or a substantial reduction in business volume from key accounts could have a material adverse effect on our financial performance, cash flows, and ability to fund our operations, capital expenditures, and strategic initiatives.
Our future growth and success depend on our ability to qualify new customers and the customer qualification cycles can take years to complete.
Our growth will depend in large part on our ability to qualify new customers. We have invested heavily in qualifying our customers and plan to continue to do so. We are in the early stages of growth in our existing markets, and we expect to substantially raise brand awareness by connecting directly with our customers. We anticipate that these activities will lead to additional deliveries, and, as a result, increase our base of qualified customers. An inability to attract new customers would substantially impact our ability to grow revenue or improve our financial results.
Customer qualification cycles are long and it can take many years for our products to qualify for customer shipment. There are numerous and rigorous safety, performance and other tests that we need to pass to achieve a customer design win. If we fail to qualify new customers in a timely manner, our business, financial condition and operating results may be harmed.
Our future growth and success depend on our ability to sell effectively to, and manage relationships with large enterprise and defense customers.
Our potential customers are manufacturers of products that tend to be large enterprises and organizations, including defense customers. Therefore, our future success will depend on our ability to effectively sell our products to such large customers. Sales to these end-customers involve risks that may not be present (or that are present to a lesser extent) with sales to smaller customers. These risks include, but are not limited to, increased purchasing power and leverage held by large customers in negotiating contractual arrangements with us and longer sales cycles and the associated risk that substantial time and resources may be spent on a potential end-customer that elects not to purchase our lithium-ion battery solutions.
Large organizations often undertake a significant evaluation process that results in a lengthy sales cycle. In addition, product purchases by large organizations are frequently subject to budget constraints, multiple approvals and unanticipated administrative, processing and other delays. Finally, large organizations typically have longer implementation cycles, require greater product functionality and scalability, require a broader range of services, demand that vendors take on a larger share of risks, require acceptance provisions that can lead to a delay in revenue recognition and expect greater payment flexibility. All of these factors can add further risk to business conducted with these potential customers.
We may not be able to accurately estimate the future supply and demand for our batteries, which could result in a variety of inefficiencies in our business and hinder our ability to generate revenue. If we fail to accurately predict our manufacturing requirements, we could incur additional costs or experience delays.
It is difficult to predict our future revenue and therefore accurately budget for our expenses, and we may have limited insight into trends that may emerge and affect our business. We anticipate being required to provide forecasts of our demand to our current and future suppliers prior to the scheduled delivery of products to potential customers. Currently, there is no historical basis for making judgments on the demand for our batteries or our ability to develop, manufacture and deliver batteries, or our profitability in the future. If we overestimate our requirements, our suppliers may have excess inventory, which would indirectly increase our costs. If we underestimate our requirements, our suppliers may have inadequate inventory, which could interrupt manufacturing of our products and result in delayed shipments and revenue. Factors outside our control may also affect the demand for our batteries. For example, many of the expected end products for our batteries are manufactured in China. If the political situation between China and the U.S. were to deteriorate, it could prevent our customers from purchasing our batteries.
Lead times for materials and components that our suppliers order may vary significantly and depend on factors such as the specific supplier, contract terms and demand for each component at a given time. If we fail to order sufficient quantities of product components in a timely manner, the delivery of batteries to our potential customers could be delayed, which would harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
Increases in sales of our lithium-ion battery cells may expose us to the risks associated with manufacturing batteries for unique customer specifications and increase our dependency upon specific customers, including due to the costs to develop and qualify our system solutions.
The development of our lithium-ion battery cells is dependent, in part, upon successfully identifying and meeting our customers’ specifications for those products. Developing and manufacturing lithium-ion batteries with specifications unique to a customer increases our reliance upon that customer for purchasing our products at sufficient volumes and prices in a timely manner. If we fail to identify or develop products on a timely basis, or at all, that comply with our customers’ specifications or achieve design wins with customers, we may experience a significant adverse impact on our revenue and margins. Even if we are successful in selling lithium-ion batteries to our customers in sufficient volume, we may be unable to generate sufficient profit if per-unit manufacturing costs exceed per-unit selling prices. Manufacturing lithium-ion batteries to customer specifications requires a longer development cycle, as compared to discrete products, to design, test and qualify, which may increase our costs. We have limited experience with this customer design process and currently have limited capacity at our manufacturing facilities. If we are unsuccessful in meeting customer specifications, scaling our manufacturing capabilities and/or providing anticipated post-delivery product support services, we may be unable to effectively manage and grow our business, including developing products for multiple customers’ design specifications in a timely manner, which could harm our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
Risks Related to Our Business
We have a history of financial losses and expect to incur significant expenses and continuing losses for the foreseeable future.
We incurred net loss attributable to Enovix of approximately $156.7 million and $222.2 million, respectively, for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2025 and December 29, 2024 and had an accumulated deficit of approximately $977.8 million as of December 28, 2025. We believe that we will continue to incur operating and net losses each quarter until at least the time we begin significant production of our lithium-ion batteries.
We currently expect that we will continue to incur losses in future periods as we, among other things: (i) continue to incur additional expenses in connection with the development of our manufacturing process and the manufacturing of our batteries; (ii) secure additional manufacturing lines and invest in manufacturing capabilities; (iii) build up inventory of components for our batteries; (iv) build up supplies of batteries for projected demand; (v) increase our sales and marketing activities; (vi) develop our distribution infrastructure; and (vii) increase our general and administrative functions to support our growing operations. We may find that these efforts are more expensive than we currently anticipate or that these efforts may not result in substantial increase in our revenue, which would further increase our losses.
If we are unable to develop our business and effectively commercialize our products as anticipated, we may not be able to generate revenue or achieve profitability.
For our silicon batteries, the growth and development of our operations will depend on the successful commercialization and market acceptance of our products and our ability to manufacture products at scale while timely meeting customers’ demands. Our silicon batteries are in the early stages of commercialization and certain aspects of our technology have not been fully field tested. For example, there is no certainty that, once shipped, our products will operate as expected, and we may not be able to generate sufficient customer confidence in our latest designs and ongoing product improvements. For our graphite batteries, we may not be able to maintain or sustain our existing customers. Our customers’ battery needs are dependent on their end market demand, and they may place purchase orders and cancel them due to lack of demand. There are inherent uncertainties in our ability to predict future demand for our products and, as a consequence, we may have inadequate production capacity to meet demand, or alternatively, have excess available capacity. Our inability to predict the extent of customer adoption of our proprietary technologies makes it difficult to evaluate our future prospects.
If we experience significant delays or order cancellations from these customers, or if we fail to develop our products in accordance with contract specifications, then our operating results and financial condition will be adversely affected. In addition, there is no assurance that if we alter or change our products in the future, that the demand for these new products will develop, which could adversely affect our business and any possible revenue. If our products are not deemed desirable and suitable for purchase and we are unable to establish a customer base, we may not be able to generate revenue or attain profitability. In addition, if we are unable to deliver our engineering services on a timely basis, we may be unable to attract and engage new or existing customers for engineering service contracts and we may not be able to generate revenue or attain profitability.
We face significant barriers in our attempts to produce our products, our products are still under development, and we may not be able to successfully develop our products at commercial scale. If we cannot successfully overcome those barriers, our business will be negatively impacted and could fail.
Producing lithium-ion batteries that meet the requirements for wide adoption by industrial and consumer applications is a difficult undertaking. We are still in the early stages of commercialization and face significant challenges achieving the long-term energy density targets for our products and producing our products in commercial volumes. Some of the challenges that could prevent the widespread adoption of our lithium-ion batteries include difficulties with (i) increasing the volume, yield and reliability of our cells, (ii) increasing manufacturing capacity to produce the volume of cells needed to meet demand, (iii) optimizing higher volume manufacturing equipment for scale, (iv) packaging our batteries to ensure adequate cycle life, (v) material cost reductions, (vi) qualifying new vendors, (vii) expanding supply chain capacity, (viii) the completion of rigorous and challenging battery safety testing required by our customers or partners, including but not limited to, performance, cycle life and abuse testing and (x) the development of the final manufacturing processes for optimal yield and throughput.
We may encounter yield, material cost, performance and manufacturing process challenges as we develop products from the AI-1 platform and ramp to volume commercial production. Further, we are likely to encounter engineering challenges as we increase the capacity of our batteries and efficiency of our manufacturing process. If we are unable to overcome these challenges in producing our batteries, our business could fail.
The Gen2 manufacturing equipment requires qualified labor to inspect the parts to ensure proper assembly. We have already experienced equipment malfunctions, and the lack of qualified labor to inspect our batteries may further slow our production and impact our manufacturing costs and production schedule.
Even if we complete development and achieve volume production of our lithium-ion batteries, if the cost, performance characteristics or other specifications of the batteries fall short of our targets, our sales, product pricing and margins will be adversely affected.
We have acquired and may continue to acquire other businesses, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, and dilute stockholder value.
In October 2023, we acquired Routejade, a manufacturer of lithium-ion batteries in South Korea, and in April 2025, acquired a second manufacturing facility in South Korea from SolarEdge. Although we have limited experience with acquisitions, we may in the future undertake acquisitions of other companies, products or technologies for the ongoing development and expansion of our operations. We may be unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates and/or
complete acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete acquisitions, we may not ultimately strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals, and any acquisitions we complete could be viewed negatively by existing and potential customers, vendors, suppliers, business partners or investors. For example, while we believe that the SolarEdge assets and facility expansion in South Korea will support capacity expansion at Fab2 and add production capacity for South Korean defense programs, there is no assurance that we will be able to realize these strategic benefits from the SolarEdge acquisition. In addition, we may not be able to integrate acquired businesses successfully or effectively manage the combined company following an acquisition. If we fail to successfully integrate our acquisitions, or the people or technologies associated with acquisitions, into our company, the results of operations of the combined company could be adversely affected.
Any integration process will require significant time and resources, attention from management and will likely disrupt the ordinary functioning of our business, and we may not be able to manage the process successfully, which could harm our business. In addition, we may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired technology and accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition transaction, including accounting charges. We may not be able to fully realize the anticipated profits or other benefits of any particular transaction in the timeframe we expect or at all due to competition, market trends, additional costs or investments, the actions of advisors, suppliers or other third parties, or other factors. Future acquisitions may result in significant costs and expenses. Further, if we fail to identify significant issues with any acquisition target during the due diligence process, we may be liable for significant and unforeseen liabilities.
We have previously, and may in the future, pay cash, incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition, any of which could negatively affect our financial condition or the value of our capital stock. The sale of our equity to finance any such acquisitions could result in dilution to our stockholders. If we incur more debt, it will result in increased fixed obligations and could also subject us to covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to flexibly operate our business.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates have had, and could continue to have, an adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We are exposed to the effects of changes in both foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Because a significant portion of our cash and investments are held in U.S. Treasury securities and other interest-bearing instruments, movements in interest rates can materially affect our investment income and the fair value of our marketable securities. Rising rates generally increase interest income on new investments, while falling rates could reduce interest income. In addition, we conduct a material portion of our operations outside of the United States, including South Korea, Malaysia and other countries in Asia. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly for the Korean won, Indian rupee, and Malaysian ringgit, could have an adverse impact our financial condition and results of operations.
Operational problems with our manufacturing equipment subject us to safety risks which, if not adequately addressed, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or prospects.
Operational problems with our manufacturing equipment subject us to safety risks which, if not adequately addressed, could result in the personal injury to or death of workers, the loss of production equipment, damage to manufacturing facilities, monetary losses, delays and unanticipated fluctuations in production. From time to time, we have experienced fires at our manufacturing facilities. While we have retained industry experts and designed our factories with appropriate safety precautions to address the fire risk of manufacturing batteries and to minimize the impact of any such event, if these precautions are inadequate or an event larger than expected, such occurrences could result in significant equipment, product or facility damage that could lead to manufacturing delays, adversely affect the timing of deliveries to customers and require additional cash to recover.
In addition, operational problems may result in environmental damage, administrative fines, increased insurance costs and potential legal liabilities. All of these operational problems could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or prospects. Further, if other battery manufacturers experience fire hazards that result in personal injury or death, it may lead to public perception challenges and unfavorable conditions for all industry participants, regardless of their individual safety records.
Lithium-ion battery modules in the marketplace have been observed to catch fire or vent smoke and flame, and such events have raised concerns over the use of such batteries.
We develop lithium-ion battery cells for industrial and consumer equipment and intend to supply these lithium-ion battery cells for industrial and consumer applications. Historically, lithium-ion batteries in laptops and cellphones have been reported to catch fire or vent smoke and flames, and more recently, news reports have indicated that several EVs that use high-power lithium-ion batteries caught on fire. Any such adverse publicity or reports reflecting fire and other safety hazards associated with the use of high-power batteries in automotive or other industrial or consumer applications will negatively affect our business and prospects. In addition, any failure of our battery cells may cause damage to the industrial or consumer equipment or lead to personal injury or death and may subject us to lawsuits.
Our risks in this area are particularly pronounced given our lithium-ion batteries and BrakeFlowTM technology have not yet been commercially tested or mass produced. We may have to recall our battery cells, which would be time-consuming and expensive. A product liability claim could generate substantial negative publicity about our batteries and business and inhibit or prevent commercialization of other future battery candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on our brand, business, prospects and operating results. Our insurance coverage might not be sufficient to cover all potential product liability claims. Any lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages either in excess of our coverage, or outside of our coverage, may have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and financial condition. We may not be able to secure additional product liability insurance coverage on commercially acceptable terms or at reasonable costs when needed, particularly if we do face liability for our products and are forced to make a claim under our policy.
Further, product liability claims, injuries, defects or other problems experienced by other companies in the lithium-ion battery market could lead to unfavorable market conditions for the industry as a whole, and may have an adverse effect on our ability to attract new customers, thus harming our growth and financial performance.
The battery market continues to evolve and is highly competitive, and we may not be successful in competing in this industry or establishing and maintaining confidence in our long-term business prospects among current and future partners and customers.
The battery market in which we compete continues to evolve and is highly competitive. Our current competitors have, and future competitors may have, greater resources than we do and may also be able to devote greater resources to the development of their current and future technologies. These competitors also may have greater access to customers and may be able to establish cooperative or strategic relationships amongst themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their resources and competitive positioning. Furthermore, existing and potential customers have developed, and may in the future develop, their own battery technologies with improvements in energy density faster than they have historically and what we have assumed, continue to reduce cost and expand supply of conventional batteries and therefore reduce our energy density advantage and price premium, which would negatively impact the prospects for our business or negatively impact our ability to sell our products at a market-competitive price and sufficient margins.
Developments in alternative technologies, improvements in batteries technology made by competitors, or changes in our competitors’ respective business models may materially adversely affect the sales, pricing and gross margins of our batteries. If a competing technology is developed that has superior operational or price performance, our business will be harmed. Further, our financial modeling assumes that, in addition to improving our core architecture over time, we are able to retain access to state-of-the-art industry materials as they are developed. If industry battery competitors develop their own proprietary materials, we would be unable to access these and would lose our competitive advantage in the market. If we fail to accurately predict and ensure that our battery technology can address customers’ changing needs or emerging technological trends, or if our customers fail to achieve the benefits expected from our lithium-ion batteries, our business will be harmed.
We must continue to commit significant resources to develop our battery technology in order to establish a competitive position, and these commitments will be made without knowing whether such investments will result in products potential customers will accept. There is no assurance we will successfully identify new customer requirements or develop and bring our batteries to market on a timely basis, or that products and technologies developed by others will not render our batteries obsolete or noncompetitive, any of which would adversely affect our business and operating results. Further, if we are unable to improve our energy density at a rate faster than the industry, our competitive
advantage will erode. In addition, if we fail to produce batteries in large scale volume production at reduced unit cost, it may negatively impact our competitive advantage in the industry.
Customers will be less likely to purchase our batteries if they are not convinced that our business will succeed in the long term. Similarly, suppliers and other third parties will be less likely to invest time and resources in developing business relationships with us if they are not convinced that our business will succeed in the long term. Accordingly, in order to build and maintain our business, we must maintain confidence among current and future partners, customers, suppliers, analysts, ratings agencies and other parties in our long-term financial viability and business prospects. Maintaining such confidence may be particularly complicated by certain factors including those that are largely outside of our control, such as our limited operating history, market unfamiliarity with our products, any delays in scaling manufacturing, delivery and service operations to meet demand, competition and uncertainty regarding our production and sales performance compared with market expectations. In addition, due to competition, we may face pricing pressure and may not be able to charge the prices we would like or achieve profitability on the timeline we plan.
We could face state-sponsored competition from overseas and may not be able to compete in the market on the basis of price.
One or more foreign governments, including the Chinese government, have concluded that battery technology and battery manufacturing is a national strategic priority and therefore have instituted official economic policies meant to support these activities. These policies may provide our competitors with artificially lower costs. If these lower costs materialize and enable competitive products to be sold into our markets at prices that, if applied to us, would cause us to become unprofitable, our ability to continue operating could be threatened.
Our failure to keep up with rapid technological changes and evolving industry standards may cause our batteries to become less marketable or obsolete, resulting in a decrease in demand for our batteries and harm our ability to grow revenue and expand margins.
The lithium-based battery market is characterized by changing technologies and evolving industry standards, which are difficult to predict. This, coupled with frequent introduction of new products and models, has shortened product life cycles and may render our batteries less marketable or obsolete. Also, our ability to grow revenue and expand margins will depend on our ability to develop and launch new product designs that are attractive to our customers. If we fail to invest in the development of new products and technologies, we may lose the opportunity to compete effectively or at all. Third parties, including our competitors, may improve their technologies or even achieve technological breakthroughs that could decrease the demand for our batteries. Our ability to adapt to evolving industry standards and anticipate future standards and market trends will be a significant factor in maintaining and improving our competitive position and our prospects for growth.
We may become subject to product liability claims, which could harm our financial condition and liquidity if we are not able to successfully defend or insure against such claims.
Highly publicized incidents of laptop computers and cell phones bursting into flames have focused attention on the safety of lithium-ion batteries. If one of our products were to cause personal injury or property damage, including as a result of product malfunctions, defects or improper installation leading to a fire or other hazardous condition, we may become subject to product liability claims, even those without merit, which could harm our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. We face inherent risk of exposure to claims in the event our batteries do not perform as expected or malfunction resulting in personal injury or death. Our risks in this area are particularly pronounced given our batteries have a limited history of commercial testing and mass production. A successful product liability claim against us could require us to pay a substantial monetary award. Moreover, a product liability claim could generate substantial negative publicity about our batteries and business and inhibit or prevent commercialization of other future battery product candidates, which would have material adverse effect on our brand, business, prospects and operating results. Any insurance coverage might not be sufficient to cover all potential product liability claims. Any lawsuit seeking significant monetary damages either in excess of our coverage, or outside of our coverage, may have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business and financial condition. We may not be able to secure additional product liability insurance coverage on commercially acceptable terms or at reasonable costs when needed, particularly if we do face liability for our products and are forced to make a claim under our policy.
If we are unable to attract and retain key employees and qualified personnel on a global basis, our business and prospects could be harmed.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain our executive officers, key employees and other qualified personnel on a global basis, and, as a relatively small company with key talent residing in a limited number of employees, our operations and prospects may be severely disrupted if we lose any one or more of their services. There have been, and may continue to be, changes in our management team resulting from the departure or onboarding of executives and key employees, which could disrupt our business. For example, in addition to turnover of key executive positions in 2023, our Chief Financial Officer stepped down in December 2024, we created a new role and appointed a Chief Accounting Officer at the end of December 2024, appointed a new Chief Financial Officer in April 2025 and our Chief Operating Officer announced his retirement, effective February 2026. Such changes in our executive management team or workforce may be disruptive to our business, divert management’s attention, result in a loss of knowledge and negatively impact employee morale.
If we encounter further turnover or difficulties associated with the transition or departure of our executive officers and key employees, or if we are unsuccessful in recruiting new personnel or in retaining and motivating existing personnel, our operations may be disrupted, which could harm our business. We are dependent on the continued service of our senior technical and management personnel because of the complexity of our products. Our senior management and key employees are employed on an at-will basis. We cannot ensure you that we will be able to retain the services of our senior management team or other key employees, or that we will be able to timely replace such employees. The loss of one or more of our senior management or other key employees could harm our business.
Labor is subject to external factors that are beyond our control, including our industry’s highly competitive market for skilled workers and leaders, cost inflation, and workforce participation rates. As we build our brand and become more well known and grow globally, there is increased risk that competitors or other companies will seek to hire our personnel. While some of our employees are bound by non-competition agreements, these may prove to be unenforceable. The failure to attract, integrate, train, motivate and retain these personnel could seriously harm our business and prospects.
If we are unable to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in the future, or implement or integrate effective internal control over financial reporting with respect to any acquired entities or subsidiaries, investors may lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, and the market price of our common stock may be materially adversely affected.
In the past, we and our independent registered public accounting firm identified two material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, all of which have since been remediated. We did not identify any material weakness in the periods covered by this report. With respect to any future acquisition, we may encounter unexpected integration challenges, and such integration process may take longer than anticipated, which may have a negative impact on our ability to report effectively on our internal controls. If we are unable to successfully integrate any future acquisition into our existing internal control over financial reporting processes in a timely manner, our ability to accurately report our financial results could be negatively impacted.
Furthermore, if, in the future, we have a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting, we may not detect errors on a timely basis and our financial statements may be materially misstated. We or our independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting, which could harm our operating results, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information and cause the trading price of our stock to fall. In addition, as a public company, we are required to file accurate and timely quarterly and annual reports with the SEC under the Exchange Act. Any failure to report our financial results on an accurate and timely basis could result in sanctions, lawsuits, delisting of our shares from the Nasdaq Global Select Market or other adverse consequences that would materially harm our business. In addition, we could become subject to investigations by the stock exchange on which our securities are listed, the SEC and other regulatory authorities and litigation from investors and stockholders, which could harm our reputation and our financial condition, and/or divert financial and management resources from our core business.
We have incurred and will continue to incur significant increased expenses and administrative burdens as a public company, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face increased legal, accounting, administrative and other costs and expenses as a public company that we would not incur as a private company. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including the requirements of Section 404, as well as rules and regulations subsequently implemented by the SEC, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, the PCAOB and the securities exchanges, impose additional reporting and other obligations on public companies. Compliance with public company requirements will increase costs and make certain activities more time consuming. A number of those requirements require us to carry out activities that we had not done previously as a private company. For example, we created new board committees and adopted new internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures.
Furthermore, if any issues in complying with those requirements are identified (for example, if we identify a material weakness or significant deficiency in the internal control over financial reporting), we could incur additional costs rectifying those issues, and the existence of those issues could adversely affect our reputation or investor perceptions of us. It may also be more expensive to obtain director and officer liability insurance. Risks associated with our status as a public company may make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers. As a public company, we have additional reporting and other obligations, which lead to higher legal, accounting and administrative costs for supporting regulatory compliance requirements. These increased costs require us to divert a significant amount of money that could otherwise be used to expand the business and achieve strategic objectives. Advocacy efforts by stockholders and third parties may also prompt additional changes in governance and reporting practices, which could further increase our compliance costs.
In addition, we are working to upgrade our enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system in order to further streamline the management of our financial, accounting, human resources, sales and marketing and other functions and enable us to manage our operations and performance more effectively. However, an upgrade of our ERP system will likely require significant resources for us to complete the implementation effectively, which may result in substantial costs. Additionally, any disruptions or difficulties in using an ERP system could adversely affect our controls and harm our business, including our ability to forecast or make sales and collect our receivables, any of which could have a material adverse affect on our business, operations and financial condition. Moreover, such disruption or difficulties could result in unanticipated costs and diversion of management attention.
We have previously been, currently are, and may in the future be involved in class-action lawsuits and other litigation matters, including commercial and other contractual disputes, that are expensive and time-consuming. If resolved adversely, lawsuits and other litigation matters could seriously harm our business.
We have previously been, currently are, and may in the future be subject to litigation, such as putative class action and shareholder derivative lawsuits brought by stockholders. We may also be involved in other legal proceedings and commercial or contractual disputes that, from time to time, are significant. These are typically claims that arise in the normal course of business including, without limitation, warranty claims and other disputes with potential customers and suppliers, intellectual property matters, personal injury claims, environmental issues, and tax and employment matters. See Note 10 “Commitments and Contingencies” of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report for a discussion of pending litigation.
It is difficult to predict the outcome, duration or ultimate financial exposure, if any, represented by these matters, and there can be no assurance that any such exposure will not be material. Any litigation to which we are a party may result in an onerous or unfavorable judgment that may not be reversed on appeal, or we may decide to settle lawsuits on similarly unfavorable terms. Any such negative outcome could result in payments of substantial monetary damages, which would negatively impact our business and stock price, and to the extent such damages are paid in stock rather than cash, would result in dilution to our current stockholders. Regardless of the final outcome, defending litigation is costly and can impose a significant burden on management and employees. Legal proceedings, contractual disputes and claims may also divert management’s attention away from our business operations, negatively affect our reputation and/or result in increased compliance costs. We have in the past, and may in the future, receive unfavorable preliminary, interim, or final rulings in pending matters, which could damage our reputation and seriously harm our business.
Risks Related to Our Capital Needs and Capital Strategy
We may not have adequate funds to finance our operating needs and our growth, and may need to raise additional capital, which we may not be able to do.
The design, manufacture and sale of batteries is a capital-intensive business. As a result of the capital-intensive nature of our business, we can be expected to continue to sustain substantial operating expenses without generating sufficient revenue to cover expenditures. We may need to raise additional capital to expand our current production capabilities or to acquire additional manufacturing lines and facilities in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Adequate additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all, and if the financial markets become difficult or costly to access, including due to rising interest rates, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates or other changes in economic conditions, our ability to raise additional capital may be negatively impacted. Our failure to raise capital in the future would have a negative impact on our ability to expand our existing manufacturing facilities for additional production lines or improve the production line capability, which would in turn negatively impact our ability to pursue our business strategies. The amount of capital that we will be required to raise, and our ability to raise substantial additional capital, will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:
•our ability and the cost to develop our new and complex manufacturing process that will produce lithium-ion batteries in a cost-effective manner;
•our ability to continue to scale our Malaysia manufacturing facility in a timely and cost-effective manner;
•our ability to locate and acquire new, larger manufacturing facilities on commercially reasonable terms;
•our ability to build out our new, larger manufacturing facilities in a cost-effective manner;
•the cost of preparing to manufacture lithium-ion batteries on a larger scale;
•the costs of commercialization activities including product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution;
•our ability to hire additional personnel;
•the demand for our lithium-ion batteries and the prices for which we will be able to sell our lithium-ion batteries, including as may be affected by the recent imposition of new and increased tariffs and global trade disruptions;
•the emergence of competing technologies or other adverse market developments; and
•volatility in the equity markets, including as a result of global trade disruptions, the imposition of new and increased tariffs, rising interest rates, inflation or war or other armed conflict.
Our long-term financial model assumptions include both expanding on our own and by partnering with other battery companies. Should we not be able to achieve these partnering goals, we would have to expand purely on our own. This would require additional capital and could impact how fast we can ramp revenue and achieve profitability. It could also impact our ability to service some customers that require second sources for supply. Additionally, if we can achieve these partnerships but not on the financial terms we are assuming, it could impact our financial performance.
Further, we cannot guarantee that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations to fund our capital expenditures or other liquidity needs. Over time, we expect that we will need to raise additional funds through the issuance of equity, equity-related or debt securities or through obtaining credit from financial institutions to fund, together with our principal sources of liquidity, ongoing costs such as research and development relating to our batteries, any significant unplanned or accelerated expenses and new strategic investments.
As discussed elsewhere in these risk factors and in the consolidated financial statements, in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we are not profitable and have incurred losses in each year since our inception. We anticipate these losses will continue and likely increase as we continue our manufacturing scale up, add additional manufacturing capacity, continue commercialization and continue to operate as a public company and comply with legal, accounting and other regulatory requirements. We cannot be certain that additional capital will be available on attractive
terms, if at all, when needed, which could be dilutive to stockholders, and our financial condition, results of operations, business and prospects could be materially and adversely affected.
Raising additional funds may cause dilution to existing stockholders and/or may restrict our operations or require us to relinquish proprietary rights.
To the extent that we raise additional capital by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, our existing stockholders may experience substantial dilution, and the terms of these issued securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our existing common stockholders. We may issue debt or equity securities under our shelf registration statement filed with the SEC in August 2023, including in an at-the-market (“ATM”) offering under our ATM facility, or we may issue debt or equity securities in private transactions. For example, during the third quarter of 2025, we declared the Warrant and raised gross proceeds of $232.1 million from the exercise of Warrants (see Note 12 “Treasury Stock, Warrant Dividend and Warrants” of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report for further details), and we issued 26,526,344 shares of our common stock in connection with the exercise of the Warrants. We also issued $360.0 million of our 2030 Convertible Senior Notes in September 2025, which are convertible into shares of our common stock (see Note 9 “Borrowings” of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report for further details).
Any agreements for future debt or preferred equity financings, if available, may involve covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as raising additional capital, incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. In addition, if we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may be required to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies or future revenue streams. If we incur additional debt, the debt holders, together with holders of our outstanding Convertible Senior Notes, would have rights senior to holders of common stock to make claims on our assets, and the terms of any future debt could restrict our operations, including our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.
Risks Related to Our Convertible Senior Notes
Servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.
Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness, including the Convertible Senior Notes, depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations, including the Convertible Senior Notes.
The conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes, if triggered, may adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.
In the event the conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Senior Notes is triggered, holders of the Convertible Senior Notes will be entitled to convert their notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Convertible Senior Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.
Certain provisions in the indenture governing the Convertible Senior Notes may delay or prevent an otherwise beneficial takeover attempt of us.
Certain provisions in the indenture governing the Convertible Senior Notes may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire us. For example, the indenture governing the Convertible Senior Notes will require us to
repurchase the Convertible Senior Notes for cash upon the occurrence of a fundamental change and, in certain circumstances, to increase the conversion rate for a holder that converts its notes in connection with a make-whole fundamental change. A takeover of us may trigger the requirement that we repurchase the Convertible Senior Notes and/or increase the conversion rate, which could make it costlier for a potential acquirer to engage in such takeover. Such additional costs associated with these and other provisions of the indenture governing our Convertible Senior Notes may have the effect of delaying or preventing a takeover of us that would otherwise be beneficial to investors.
Conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes may dilute the ownership interest of our stockholders or may otherwise depress the price of our common stock.
The conversion of some or all of the Convertible Senior Notes may dilute the ownership interests of our stockholders. Upon conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes, we have the option to pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock. If we elect to settle our conversion obligation in shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock, any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon such conversion could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the Convertible Senior Notes may encourage short selling by market participants because the conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes could be used to satisfy short positions, or anticipated conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes into shares of our common stock could depress the price of our common stock.
The accounting method for the Convertible Senior Notes could adversely affect our reported financial condition and results.
The accounting method for reflecting the Convertible Senior Notes, including our Affiliate Notes (each as defined in Note 9 “Borrowings” of our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report, accruing interest expense for the Convertible Senior Notes and reflecting the underlying shares of our common stock in our reported diluted earnings per share may adversely affect our reported earnings and financial condition.
In August 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board published Accounting Standards Update 2020-06 (“ASU 2020-06”), which simplified certain of the accounting standards that apply to convertible notes. ASU 2020-06 eliminated the cash conversion and beneficial conversion feature modes used to separately account for embedded conversion features as a component of equity. Instead, an entity would account for convertible debt or convertible preferred stock securities as a single unit of account, unless the conversion feature requires bifurcation and recognition as derivatives. Additionally, the guidance requires entities to use the “if-converted” method for all convertible instruments in the diluted earnings per share calculation and to include the effect of potential share settlement for instruments that may be settled in cash or shares. ASU 2020-06 became effective for us beginning on January 1, 2022.
In accordance with ASU 2020-06, we recorded the Convertible Senior Notes as a liability on our consolidated balance sheets, with the initial carrying amount equal to the principal amount of the Convertible Senior Notes, net of issuance costs. The issuance costs are treated as a debt discount for accounting purposes, which are amortized into interest expense over the term of the Convertible Senior Notes. As a result of this amortization, the interest expense that we recognize for the Convertible Senior Notes for accounting purposes is greater than the cash interest payments we will pay on the Convertible Senior Notes, which will result in lower reported income.
In addition, the shares of common stock underlying the Convertible Senior Notes are reflected in our diluted earnings per share using the “if converted” method, if dilutive, in accordance with ASU 2020-06. Under that method, diluted earnings per share are generally calculated assuming that all the Convertible Senior Notes were converted solely into shares of common stock at the beginning of the reporting period, unless the result would be anti-dilutive. The application of the if-converted method may reduce our reported diluted earnings per share to the extent we are profitable in the future, and accounting standards may change in the future in a manner that may adversely affect our diluted earnings per share.
Furthermore, if any of the conditions to the convertibility of the Convertible Senior Notes is satisfied, then we may be required under applicable accounting standards to reclassify the liability carrying value of the Convertible Senior Notes as a current, rather than a long-term, liability. This reclassification could be required even if no noteholders or holders of Affiliate Notes convert their Convertible Senior Notes or Affiliate Notes, respectively, following the satisfaction of those conditions and could materially reduce our reported working capital.
The capped call transactions may affect the value of the Convertible Senior Notes and our common stock.
In connection with the pricing of the Convertible Senior Notes and the exercise by the initial purchasers of their option to purchase additional Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into capped call transactions (the “Capped Call Transactions”) with certain of the initial purchasers or affiliates thereof and/or other financial institutions (the “Option Counterparties”). The Capped Call Transactions will cover, subject to customary adjustments, the number of shares of our common stock initially underlying the Convertible Senior Notes. The Capped Call Transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution to our common stock upon any conversion of notes and/or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted notes, as the case may be, with such reduction and/or offset subject to a cap.
In connection with establishing their initial hedges of the Capped Call Transactions, the Option Counterparties or their respective affiliates likely entered into various derivative transactions with respect to our common stock and/or purchased shares of our common stock concurrently with or shortly after the pricing of the Convertible Senior Notes, including with, or from, as the case may be, certain investors in the Convertible Senior Notes.
In addition, the Option Counterparties and/or their respective affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchasing or selling our common stock or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the Convertible Senior Notes (and are likely to do so on each exercise date of the Capped Call Transactions, or, to the extent we exercise the relevant election under the Capped Call Transactions, following any repurchase, redemption, or conversion of the Convertible Senior Notes).
We cannot make any prediction as to the direction or magnitude of any potential effect that the transactions described above may have on the price of the Convertible Senior Notes or the shares of our common stock. Any of these activities could adversely affect the value of the Convertible Senior Notes and our common stock.
We are subject to counterparty risk with respect to the Capped Call Transactions.
The Option Counterparties are financial institutions, and we will be subject to the risk that any or all of them might default under the Capped Call Transactions. Our exposure to the credit risk of the Option Counterparties will not be secured by any collateral.
If an Option Counterparty becomes subject to insolvency proceedings, we will become an unsecured creditor in those proceedings with a claim equal to our exposure at that time under the capped call transaction with such Option Counterparty. Our exposure will depend on many factors but, generally, an increase in our exposure will be correlated to an increase in the market price and in the volatility of our common stock. In addition, upon a default by an Option Counterparty, we may suffer more dilution than we currently anticipate with respect to our common stock. We can provide no assurances as to the financial stability or viability of the Option Counterparties.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
We rely heavily on our intellectual property portfolio. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our business and competitive position would be harmed.
We may not be able to prevent unauthorized use of our intellectual property, which could harm our business and competitive position. We rely upon a combination of the intellectual property protections afforded by patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, as well as license agreements and other contractual protections, to establish, maintain and enforce rights in our proprietary technologies. In addition, we seek to protect our intellectual property rights through nondisclosure and invention assignment agreements with our employees and consultants and through non-disclosure agreements with business partners and other third parties. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, third parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our intellectual property or be able to design around our intellectual property. Monitoring unauthorized use of our intellectual property is difficult and costly, and the steps we have taken or will take to prevent misappropriation may not be sufficient. Any enforcement efforts we undertake, including litigation, could be time-consuming and expensive and could divert management’s attention, which could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. Moreover, our intellectual property is stored on computer systems that could be penetrated by intruders and potentially misappropriated. There is no guarantee that our efforts to protect our computer systems will be effective. In addition, existing intellectual property laws and contractual remedies may afford less protection than needed to safeguard our intellectual property portfolio.
Patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws vary significantly throughout the world. A number of foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as do U.S. laws. Therefore, our intellectual property rights may not be as strong or as easily enforced outside the U.S., and efforts to protect against the unauthorized use of our intellectual property rights, technology and other proprietary rights may be more expensive and difficult outside the U.S. Further, we have not established our intellectual property rights in all countries in the world, and competitors may copy our designs and technology and operate in countries in which we have not prosecuted our intellectual property. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could result in our competitors using our intellectual property to offer products, and competitors’ ability to design around our intellectual property would enable competitors to offer similar or better batteries, in each case potentially resulting in the loss of some of our competitive advantage and a decrease in our revenue, which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
We may need to defend ourselves against intellectual property infringement claims, which may be time-consuming and could cause us to incur substantial costs.
Companies, organizations or individuals, including our current and future competitors, may hold or obtain patents, trademarks or other proprietary rights that would prevent, limit or interfere with our ability to make, use, develop or sell our products, which could make it more difficult for us to operate our business. From time to time, we may receive inquiries from holders of patents or trademarks inquiring whether we are infringing their proprietary rights and/or seek court declarations that they do not infringe upon our intellectual property rights. Companies holding patents or other intellectual property rights relating to batteries, electric motors or electronic power management systems may bring suits alleging infringement of such rights or otherwise asserting their rights and seeking licenses. In addition, if we are determined to have infringed upon a third party’s intellectual property rights, we may be required to do one or more of the following:
•cease selling, incorporating or using products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property;
•pay substantial damages;
•obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual property right, which license may not be available on reasonable terms or at all; or
•redesign our batteries.
In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us and our failure or inability to obtain a license to the infringed technology, our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, any litigation or claims, whether or not valid, could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and management’s attention.
We may also license patents and other intellectual property from third parties, and we may face claims that our use of this intellectual property infringes the rights of others. In such cases, we may seek indemnification from our licensors under our license contracts with them. However, our rights to indemnification may be unavailable or insufficient to cover our costs and losses, depending on our use of the technology, whether we choose to retain control over conduct of the litigation and other factors.
Our patent applications may not result in issued patents or our patent rights may be contested, circumvented, invalidated or limited in scope, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from interfering with our commercialization of our products.
Our patent applications may not result in issued patents, which may have a material adverse effect on our ability to prevent others from commercially exploiting products similar to ours. The status of patents involves complex legal and factual questions and the breadth of claims allowed is uncertain. As a result, we cannot be certain that the patent applications that we file will result in patents being issued or that our patents and any patents that may be issued to us will afford protection against competitors with similar technology. Numerous patents and pending patent applications owned by others exist in the fields in which we have developed and are developing our technology. In addition to those who may claim priority, any of our existing or pending patents may also be challenged by others on the basis that they are otherwise invalid or unenforceable. Furthermore, patent applications filed in foreign countries are subject to laws, rules and procedures that differ from those in the U.S., and thus we cannot be certain that foreign patent applications related to issued U.S. patents will be issued.
Even if our patent applications succeed and we are issued patents in accordance with them, it is still uncertain whether these patents will be contested, circumvented, invalidated or limited in scope in the future. The rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with meaningful protection or competitive advantages, and some foreign countries provide significantly less effective patent enforcement than in the U.S. In addition, the claims under any patents that issue from our patent applications may not be broad enough to prevent others from developing technologies that are similar or that achieve results similar to ours. The intellectual property rights of others could also bar us from licensing and exploiting any patents that issue from our pending applications. In addition, patents issued to us may be infringed upon or designed around by others, and others may obtain patents that we need to license or design around, either of which would increase costs and may adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results.
Risks Related to Our Regulatory Compliance
We may encounter regulatory approval difficulties which could delay our ability to launch our lithium-ion battery cells, and compliance with regulatory laws may limit their usefulness.
Any delay in the development and manufacturing scale-up of our lithium-ion battery cells would negatively impact our business as it will delay time to revenue and negatively impact our customer relationships. For example, although we plan to successfully pass all required regulatory abuse testing, because our design is new and has very high energy density, there may be unanticipated failure modes that occur in the field which could delay or prevent us from launching our batteries. Further, there are current limits on the amount of energy that can be transported using different delivery methods, particularly air travel. These limits on battery transportation have historically been based on the energy of batteries currently on the market. If battery transportation regulations remain static or the energy capacity of new batteries is deemed unsafe at certain levels, our transportation options may be limited, which could increase the costs and duration of shipping of our finished product and reduce customer use of our batteries in certain locations. This could increase our inventory costs and limit sales of our batteries in some markets.
We are subject to substantial regulation, and unfavorable changes to, or our failure to comply with, these regulations could substantially harm our business and operating results.
Our batteries are subject to substantial regulation under international, federal, state and local laws, including export control laws. We expect to incur significant costs in complying with these regulations. Regulations related to the battery and alternative energy are currently evolving, and we face risks associated with changes to these regulations.
To the extent the laws change, our products may not comply with applicable international, federal, state or local laws, which would have an adverse effect on our business. Compliance with changing regulations could be burdensome, time consuming and expensive. To the extent compliance with new regulations is cost prohibitive, our business, prospects, financial condition and operating results would be adversely affected.
Internationally, there may be laws in jurisdictions we have not yet entered or laws we are unaware of in jurisdictions we have entered that may restrict our sales or other business practices. The laws in this area can be complex, difficult to interpret and may change over time. Continued regulatory limitations and other obstacles that may interfere with our ability to commercialize our products could have a negative and material impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to a variety of laws and regulations related to the safety and transportation of our batteries. Our failure to comply with these laws and regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Many federal, state and local authorities require certification by Underwriters Laboratory, Inc., an independent, not-for-profit corporation engaged in the testing of products for compliance with certain public safety standards, or other safety regulation certification prior to marketing battery cells. Foreign jurisdictions also have regulatory authorities overseeing the safety of consumer products. Our products may not meet the specifications required by these authorities. A determination that any of our products are not in compliance with these rules and regulations could result in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.
In addition, lithium batteries have been identified as a Class 9 dangerous good during transport. To be safely transported (by air, sea, rail or roadways), they must meet various international, national, state and local authorities, including, for example, the provisions laid out in United Nations standard UN 38.3. This standard applies to batteries
transported either on their own or installed in a device. UN 38.3 has been adopted by regulators and competent authorities around the world, thus making it a requirement for global market access. Any failure to fully comply with such international or other transportation safety standards could subject us to increased costs or future liabilities.
We are subject to requirements relating to environmental and safety regulations and environmental remediation matters which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and reputation.
We are subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, solid and hazardous waste storage, treatment and disposal and remediation of releases of hazardous materials. There are significant capital, operating and other costs associated with compliance with these environmental laws and regulations. Environmental laws and regulations may become more stringent in the future, which could increase costs of compliance or require us to manufacture with alternative technologies and materials.
Federal, state and local authorities also regulate a variety of matters, including, but not limited to, health, safety and permitting in addition to the environmental matters discussed above. New legislation and regulations may require us to make material changes to our operations, resulting in significant increases to the cost of production.
Our manufacturing process will have hazards such as, but not limited to, hazardous materials, machines with moving parts and high voltage and/or high current electrical systems typical of large manufacturing equipment and related safety incidents. There may be safety incidents that damage machinery or product, slow or stop production or harm employees. Consequences may include litigation, regulation, fines, increased insurance premiums, mandates to temporarily halt production, workers’ compensation claims or other actions that impact the company brand, finances or ability to operate.
We have expended significant resources as a public company to comply with Section 404(a)of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which compliance costs may increase as our operations expand. Any failure to maintain effective controls and procedures could negatively impact our business.
We are subject to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The standards required for a public company under Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 are significantly more stringent than those that were required of us as a privately held company. Management may not be able to maintain effective controls and procedures that adequately respond to these increased regulatory compliance and reporting requirements. Further, we need to incorporate any future acquired acquisitions into our existing system of internal controls and procedures, which will further increase our compliance costs, may require additional staff, and will likely divert the attention of management in the transition and integration period. If we are not able to maintain the requirements of Section 404(a) in a timely manner or with adequate compliance, we may not be able to assess whether our internal controls over financial reporting are effective, which may subject us to adverse regulatory consequences and could harm investor confidence and the market price of our securities.
We are required, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment includes disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Our compliance with Section 404 requires that we incur substantial expenses and expend significant management efforts. As we continue to expand our operations, including into international locations, we use a combination of our in-house Internal Audit team and third party service providers to assess and improve effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, and we will likely expend more resources to hire additional accounting and finance staff with appropriate public company experience, technical accounting knowledge, and local knowledge, to update and refine the process documentation and internal controls for Section 404 compliance at each of our operational locations.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Securities
The trading price of our common stock may be volatile, and the value of our common stock may decline.
Historically, our stock price has been volatile and the trading price of our securities could continue to be volatile. The trading price of our common stock is subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, many of which are beyond our control. Any of the factors listed below could have a material adverse effect on your investment in our
securities and our securities may trade at prices significantly below the price you paid. In such circumstances, the trading price of our securities may not recover and may experience a further decline.
Factors affecting the trading price of our securities:
•actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;
•changes in the market’s expectations about our operating results;
•market perception and speculation regarding announcements of new product or customer agreements;
•success of competitors;
•our operating results failing to meet the expectation of securities analysts or investors in a particular period;
•changes in financial estimates and recommendations by securities analysts concerning us or the market in general;
•operating and stock price performance of other companies that investors deem comparable to us;
•our ability to develop product candidates;
•changes in laws and regulations affecting our business;
•commencement of, or involvement in, litigation involving us;
•changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
•the volume of shares of our securities available for public sale;
•any major change in our board of directors or management;
•sales of securities convertible into shares of our capital stock by us;
•sales of substantial amounts of common stock by our directors, executive officers or significant stockholders or the perception that such sales could occur; and
•general economic and political conditions such as recessions, interest rates, fuel prices, international currency fluctuations and acts of war or other armed conflict or terrorism.
Broad market and industry factors may materially harm the market price of our securities irrespective of our operating performance. The stock market in general and the Nasdaq Global Select Market in particular have experienced price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of the particular companies affected. The trading prices and valuations of these stocks, and of our securities, are not predictable. A loss of investor confidence in the market for battery company stocks or the stocks of other companies which investors perceive to be similar to us could depress our stock price regardless of our business, prospects, financial conditions or results of operations. A decline in the market price of our securities also could adversely affect our ability to issue additional securities and our ability to obtain additional financing in the future.
Furthermore, short sellers may engage in manipulative activity intended to drive down the market price of target company stock. We have in the past been the subject of a short seller report containing certain allegations against us. While we reviewed the allegations in such report and believe them to be unsubstantiated, we may in the future become subject to additional unfavorable reports, which may cause us to expend a significant number of resources to investigate such allegations and may lead to increased volatility in the price of our common stock.
If securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about us, our business, or our market, or if they change their recommendations regarding our securities adversely, the price and trading volume of our securities could decline.
The trading market for our securities is influenced by the research and reports that industry or securities analysts may publish about us, our business, our market, or our competitors. If any of the analysts who currently cover us change their recommendation regarding our stock adversely, or provide more favorable relative recommendations about our
competitors, the price of our securities would likely decline. If any analyst who currently covers us were to cease coverage of us or fail to regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline. If we obtain additional coverage and any new analyst issues an adverse or misleading opinion regarding us, our business model, our intellectual property or our stock performance, or if our operating results fail to meet the expectations of analysts, our stock price could decline.
The future sales of shares by existing stockholders may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any time. If our stockholders sell, or the market perceives that our stockholders intend to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the market price of our common stock could decline. We have a total of 217,224,442 shares of common stock outstanding as of February 20, 2026. All of our outstanding shares are eligible for sale in the public market, other than shares and options held by directors, executive officers, and other affiliates that are subject to volume limitations under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, various vesting agreements, and restrictive legends that limit sales other than under an effective registration statement. Additionally, the shares of common stock subject to outstanding options and restricted stock unit awards under our equity incentive plans and the shares reserved for future issuance under our equity incentive plans will become eligible for sale in the public market upon issuance, subject to the applicable provisions of our insider trading policy.
Private Placement Warrants are exercisable for our common stock, which would increase the number of shares eligible for future resale in the public market and result in dilution to our stockholders.
In connection with the initial public offering of our predecessor entity, Rodgers Silicon Valley Acquisition Corp. (“RSVAC”), RSVAC issued and sold 6,000,000 private placement warrants (the “Private Placement Warrants”) to Rodgers Capital, LLC, which entity subsequently distributed the Private Placement Warrants to its Series B Unit holders. Each Private Placement Warrant is exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $10.66 per share. There are 5,500,000 Private Placement Warrants outstanding following the exercise of warrants by one warrant holder in July 2024.
To the extent Private Placement Warrants are exercised, additional shares of our common stock will be issued, which will result in dilution to our existing common stockholders, and increase the number of our shares eligible for resale in the public market.
Sales of a substantial number of these shares in the public market, or the perception of such sales, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The Private Placement Warrants expire on July 14, 2026, or earlier upon redemption or liquidation, as more fully described in the Warrant Agreement, dated July 31, 2021, filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
An active trading market for our securities may not continue, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of our securities.
The price of our securities may fluctuate significantly due to general market and economic conditions and an active trading market for our securities may not be sustained. In addition, the price of our securities can vary due to general economic conditions and forecasts, our general business condition and the release of our financial reports. If our securities are not listed on, or for any reason become delisted from, the Nasdaq Global Select Market and are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board, an inter-dealer automated quotation system for equity securities that is not a national securities exchange, the liquidity and price of our securities will be adversely affected. You may be unable to sell your securities if an active trading market for our securities cannot be sustained and/or the securities are no longer listed on the Nasdaq Global Select Market or other national securities exchange.
There can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the continued listing standards of the Nasdaq Global Select Market.
If the Nasdaq Global Select Market delists our securities from trading on its exchange for failure to meet the listing standards, we and our stockholders could face significant material adverse consequences including:
•a limited availability of market quotations for our securities;
•a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” which will require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules, possibly resulting in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our common stock;
•a limited amount of analyst coverage; and
•a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware and U.S. federal district courts will be the exclusive forums for certain disputes between us and our stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to choose the judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if and only if the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware lacks subject matter jurisdiction, any state court located within the State of Delaware or, if and only if all such state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction, the federal district court for the District of Delaware) is the exclusive forum for:
•any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf;
•any action asserting a claim of breach of fiduciary duty owed by any of our current or former directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders;
•any action asserting a claim against us by any of our current or former directors, officers or other employees to us or our stockholders arising under the Delaware General Corporation Law, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or our amended and restated bylaws;
•any action or proceeding to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the amended and restated certificate of incorporation or the amended or restated bylaws (including any right, obligation or remedy thereunder);
•any action or proceeding as to which the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware confers jurisdiction to the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware; and
•any action asserting a claim against us or any of our current or former directors, officers or other employees that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in all cases to the fullest extent permitted by law and subject to the court’s having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants.
This exclusive-forum provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) or any other claim for which the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). In addition, to prevent having to litigate claims in multiple jurisdictions and the threat of inconsistent or contrary rulings by different courts, among other considerations, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, to the fullest extent permitted by law, U.S. federal district courts will be the exclusive forum for resolving any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act. However, Section 22 of the Securities Act creates concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder. Accordingly, both state and federal courts have jurisdiction to entertain such claims. As noted above, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that U.S. federal district courts will be the exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action under the Securities Act. Due to the concurrent jurisdiction for federal and state courts created by Section 22 of the Securities Act over all suits brought to enforce any duty or liability created by the Securities Act or the rules and regulations thereunder, there is uncertainty as to whether a court would enforce the exclusive form provision. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation further provides that any person or entity holding, owning or otherwise acquiring any interest in any of our securities shall be deemed to have notice of and consented to these provisions. Investors also cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
These exclusive-forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees. While the Delaware courts have determined that such choice of forum provisions are facially valid, a stockholder may nevertheless seek to bring such a claim arising
under the Securities Act against us or our directors, officers or other employees in a venue other than in U.S. federal district courts. In such instance, we would expect to vigorously assert the validity and enforceability of the exclusive forum provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation. This may require significant additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions and we cannot assure you that the provisions will be enforced by a court in those other jurisdictions. If a court were to find either exclusive-forum provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur further significant additional costs associated with resolving the dispute in other jurisdictions, all of which could harm our business.
General Risk Factors
Global conflicts could adversely impact our business, costs, supply chain, sales, financial condition or results of operations.
Recent global conflicts, such as the Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the war in Yemen, have led the U.S. and certain other countries to impose significant sanctions and trade actions and have slowed down shipping options. The U.S. and other countries could impose further sanctions, trade restrictions and other retaliatory actions, and affect shipment of products. It is not possible to predict the broader consequences of the conflicts, including related geopolitical tensions, and the measures and retaliatory actions taken by the U.S. and other countries in respect thereof, as well as any counter measures or retaliatory actions taken in response, have caused and are likely to continue to cause regional instability and geopolitical shifts. Further, such conflicts have in the past, and will likely continue to, materially adversely affected global trade, currency exchange rates, regional economies and the global economy. While it is difficult to anticipate the impact of any of the foregoing on the Company, such conflicts, and any similar future conflicts, including as a result of rising tensions between China and Taiwan, and actions taken in response to any conflict, could increase our costs, disrupt our supply chain, reduce our sales and earnings, impair our ability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all, or otherwise adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If our batteries, our website, systems or data we maintain are or were compromised we could experience adverse consequences resulting from such compromise, including but not limited to regulatory investigations or actions; litigation; fines and penalties; disruptions of our business operations; reputational harm; loss of revenue or profits; loss of customers or sales; and other adverse consequences.
In the ordinary course of business, we collect, receive, store, process, generate, use, transfer, disclose, make accessible, protect, secure, dispose of, transmit, and share (collectively, process) personal data and other sensitive information, including proprietary and confidential business data, trade secrets, intellectual property, and sensitive third-party data. cyberattacks, malicious internet-based activity, online and offline fraud, and other similar activities threaten the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of our sensitive information and information technology systems, and those of the third parties upon which we rely. Such threats are prevalent and continue to rise, are increasingly difficult to detect, and come from a variety of sources, including traditional computer “hackers,” threat actors, “hacktivists,” organized criminal threat actors, personnel (such as through theft or misuse), sophisticated nation states, and nation-state-supported actors. Some actors now engage and are expected to continue to engage in cyber-attacks, including without limitation nation-state actors for geopolitical reasons and in conjunction with military conflicts and defense activities. During times of war and other major conflicts, we, the third parties upon which we rely, and our customers may be vulnerable to a heightened risk of these attacks, including retaliatory cyber-attacks, that could materially disrupt our systems and operations, supply chain, and ability to produce, sell and distribute our goods and services.
We and the third parties upon which we rely are subject to a variety of evolving threats, including but not limited to social-engineering attacks (including through deep fakes, which may be increasingly more difficult to identify as fake, and phishing attacks), malicious code (such as viruses and worms), malware (including as a result of advanced persistent threat intrusions), denial-of-service attacks, credential stuffing attacks, credential harvesting, personnel misconduct or error, ransomware attacks, supply-chain attacks, software bugs, server malfunctions, software or hardware failures, attacks facilitated or enhanced by artificial intelligence, loss of data or other information technology assets, adware, telecommunications failures, earthquakes, fires, floods, and other similar threats. In particular, severe ransomware attacks are becoming increasingly prevalent – particularly for companies like ours that are engaged in manufacturing – and can lead to significant interruptions in our operations, loss of sensitive data and income, reputational harm, and diversion of funds. Extortion payments may alleviate the negative impact of a ransomware attack, but we may be unwilling or unable to make such payments due to, for example, applicable laws or regulations prohibiting such payments.
Remote work has become more common and has increased risks to our information technology systems and data, as more of our employees utilize network connections, computers and devices outside our premises or network, including working at home, while in transit and in public locations. Additionally, future or past business transactions (such as acquisitions or integrations) could expose us to additional cybersecurity risks and vulnerabilities, as our systems could be negatively affected by vulnerabilities present in acquired or integrated entities’ systems and technologies. Furthermore, we may discover security issues that were not found during due diligence of such acquired or integrated entities, and it may be difficult to integrate any acquired companies into our information technology environment and security program.
We rely on third-party service providers and technologies to operate critical business systems to process sensitive information in a variety of contexts, including, without limitation, cloud-based infrastructure, data center facilities, encryption and authentication technology, employee email, and other functions. Our ability to monitor these third parties’ information security practices is limited, and these third parties may not have adequate information security measures in place. If our third-party service providers experience a security incident or other interruption, we could experience adverse consequences. For example, the Crowdstrike-Microsoft outage in July 2024 caused temporary disruptions to our systems and servers at our U.S., Malaysia and India locations. While we may be entitled to damages if our third-party service providers fail to satisfy their privacy or security-related obligations to us, or we may be entitled to reimbursement under our insurance policies, any award may be insufficient to cover our damages, or we may be unable to recover such award.
Any of the previously identified or similar threats could cause a security incident or other interruption that could result in unauthorized, unlawful, or accidental acquisition, modification, destruction, loss, alteration, encryption, disclosure of, or access to our sensitive information or our information technology systems, or those of the third parties upon whom we rely. A security incident or other interruption could disrupt our ability (and that of third parties upon whom we rely) to provide our products. We may expend significant resources or modify our business activities to try to protect against security incidents. Certain data privacy and security obligations may require us to implement and maintain specific security measures or industry-standard or reasonable security measures to protect our information technology systems and sensitive information.
While we have implemented security measures designed to protect against security incidents, there can be no assurance that these measures will be effective. We take steps to detect, mitigate, and remediate vulnerabilities in our information systems (such as our hardware and/or software, including that of third parties upon which we rely), but we may not be able to detect and remediate all vulnerabilities on a timely basis because the threats and techniques used to exploit the vulnerability change frequently and are often sophisticated in nature. Therefore, such vulnerabilities could be exploited but may not be detected until after a security incident has occurred. These vulnerabilities pose material risks to our business. Further, we may experience delays in developing and deploying remedial measures designed to address any such identified vulnerabilities. Vulnerabilities could be exploited and result in a security incident.
Applicable data privacy and security obligations may require us to notify relevant stakeholders, including affected individuals, customers, regulators, and investors, of security incidents. For example, new SEC rules require disclosure on Form 8-K of the nature, scope and timing of any material cybersecurity incident and the reasonably likely impact of such incident. Such disclosures are costly, and the disclosure or the failure to comply with such requirements could lead to adverse consequences. If we (or a third party upon whom we rely) experience a security incident or are perceived to have experienced a security incident, we may experience adverse consequences, such as government enforcement actions (for example, investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections); additional reporting requirements and/or oversight; restrictions on processing sensitive information (including personal data); litigation (including class claims); indemnification obligations; negative publicity; reputational harm; monetary fund diversions; diversion of management attention; interruptions in our operations (including availability of data); financial loss; and other similar harms. Security incidents and attendant consequences may cause customers to stop using our products, deter new customers from using our products, and negatively impact our ability to grow and operate our business.
Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our data privacy and security obligations. We cannot be sure that our insurance coverage will be adequate or sufficient to protect us from or to mitigate liabilities arising out of our privacy and security practices, that such coverage will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that such coverage will pay future claims.
Additionally, sensitive information of the Company or our customers could be leaked, disclosed, or revealed as a result of or in connection with the use by our employees, personnel, or vendors of generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies.
We are subject to stringent and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and other obligations related to data privacy and security. Our actual or perceived failure to comply with such obligations could harm our reputation and expose us to increased liability and other adverse business consequences.
We collect, store, use, transfer and share (collectively, “process”) personal data and other sensitive information. Our data processing activities may subject us to various laws and contractual requirements. A number of U.S. states have enacted comprehensive privacy laws that impose certain obligations on covered businesses. For example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, as amended by the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (collectively, “CCPA”) applies to personal data of California residents and requires businesses to provide specific disclosures in privacy notices and honor requests of such individuals to exercise certain privacy rights.
Outside the U.S., the U.K. and EU General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) applies to some of our operations in Europe. Our data processing activities in Asia are subject to new and emerging data privacy regimes, including China’s Personal Information Law 2021 (“PIPL”) and in India’s Digital Personal Data Protection Act (“DPDPA”).
Our employees are instructed by Enovix IT not to use unauthorized generative AI and machine learning (“ML”) technologies to perform their work. However, employees’ indirect use of generative AI in unapproved third-party software and services may still occur, risking the inadvertent disclosure of personal data and sensitive company information to third parties. As Governments have passed and are likely to pass additional laws regulating generative AI, our use of this technology could result in additional compliance costs, regulatory investigations and actions, and lawsuits. If we are unable to use generative AI, it could make our business less efficient and result in competitive disadvantages.
Obligations related to data privacy and security are quickly changing, becoming increasingly stringent, and creating regulatory uncertainty. Preparing for and complying with these obligations requires us to devote significant resources, which may necessitate changes to our services, information technologies, systems, and practices, and to those of any third parties that process personal data on our behalf. If we or the third parties on which we rely fail, or are perceived to have failed, to address or comply with applicable data privacy and security obligations, we could face significant consequences, including government enforcement investigations, fines, penalties, audits, and inspections, additional reporting requirements, and litigation. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, or financial condition.
We are exposed to risks related to the use of AI by us and others in our industry.
We are working to incorporate AI and GenAI tools into various aspects of our business operations, including research and development, battery design, manufacturing optimization and other testing applications. AI-based technologies are complex, rapidly evolving and may not produce the intended benefits. Algorithms, models or training data may be flawed, biased or incomplete, which could result in inaccurate analyses or design decisions. If AI-assisted outputs are relied upon in product development, performance modeling, safety analysis or manufacturing processes and prove to be incorrect, our product performance, reliability, safety profile or regulatory compliance could be adversely affected, potentially resulting in delays, increased costs, product liability exposure or reputational harm.
The use of AI may also increase the risk of intellectual property infringement, trade secret exposure or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information, including proprietary battery designs and manufacturing processes. In addition, our suppliers, partners or competitors may more effectively leverage AI technologies, which could impair our competitive position. The evolving regulatory landscape governing AI may impose additional compliance obligations or restrict our ability to deploy AI tools. Any of these risks could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our facilities or operations could be damaged or adversely affected as a result of natural disasters and other catastrophic events.
Our facilities or operations could be adversely affected by events outside of our control, such as natural disasters, wars or other armed conflicts, health epidemics, pandemics and other outbreaks, the long-term effects of climate change and other calamities. Our headquarters is located in Fremont, California, which is prone to earthquakes. We cannot assure you that any backup systems will be adequate to protect us from the effects of fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes,
power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins, war, riots, terrorist attacks or similar events. Any of the foregoing events may give rise to interruptions, breakdowns, system failures, technology platform failures or internet failures, which could cause the loss or corruption of data or malfunctions of software or hardware as well as adversely affect our ability to provide services.
Any financial or economic crisis, or perceived threat of such a crisis, including a significant decrease in consumer confidence, may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Financial or economic crisis, inflation and other macroeconomic pressures in the U.S. and global economy, such as rising interest rates and recession fears, can create a complex and challenging environment for us and our customers. In particular, our operations could be adversely impacted by inflation due to higher material, labor, and construction costs. Even in instances where the U.S. and foreign governments may take actions intended to address and rectify extreme market and economic conditions, such as by providing liquidity and stability to the financial markets, these actions may not be successful.
Extended periods of high inflation or adverse economic conditions may negatively impact the demand for our lithium-ion battery cells and may negatively impact our ability to raise capital, if needed, on a timely basis and on acceptable terms or at all. Further, if we are not able to fully offset higher costs from inflation through price increases or other corrective measures, this may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to utilize our net operating losses and certain other tax attributes to offset future taxable income and taxes may be subject to certain limitations.
Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the “Code”), a corporation is generally allowed a deduction for net operating losses (“NOLs”) carried over from a prior taxable year. Under the Code, we can carryforward our NOLs to offset our future taxable income, if any, until such NOLs are used or expire. The same is true of other unused tax attributes, such as tax credits. Under current U.S. federal income tax law, U.S. federal NOLs generated in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017, may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of such U.S. federal NOLs is limited to 80 percent of taxable income. Many U.S. states do not conform to current U.S. federal income tax law regarding NOLs carried forward and deductibility, and generally have more restrictive rules which limit the use of NOLs for state income tax purposes. In addition, there may be periods during which states suspend or otherwise limit the use of NOLs for state income tax purposes.
In addition, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code and corresponding provisions under state law, a corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to limitations on its ability to use its pre-change NOL carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes to offset future taxable income and taxes. The limitations apply if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” which is generally defined as a greater than 50 percentage point change (by value) in its equity ownership by certain stockholders over a three-year period. We have experienced ownership changes and are subject to limitations on our ability to utilize a portion of our NOLs and other tax attributes to offset taxable income or tax liability. In addition, future changes in our stock ownership, which may be outside of our control, may trigger additional ownership changes and further limitations. Similar provisions of state tax law may also apply to suspend or otherwise limit our use of accumulated state tax attributes. As a result, even if we earn net taxable income in the future, our ability to use our or Legacy Enovix’s NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes to offset such taxable income or tax liability may be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future income tax liability to us.
Changes in tax laws or regulations that are applied adversely to us or our customers may have a material adverse effect on our business, cash flow, financial condition or results of operations.
New income, sales, use or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be enacted at any time, which could adversely affect our business operations and financial performance. Further, existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to us. For example, the legislation enacted in Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 enacted many significant changes to U.S. tax laws. Further guidance from the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities with respect to such legislation may affect us, and certain aspects of such legislation could be repealed or modified in future legislation. In addition, it is uncertain if and to what extent various states will conform to federal tax laws. Future tax reform legislation could have a material impact on the value of our deferred tax assets and could increase our future U.S. tax expense.
In addition, effective January 1, 2022, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 requires taxpayers to capitalize and subsequently amortize research and development expenses over five years for research activities conducted in the U.S. and over 15 years for research activities conducted outside the U.S. Unless the U.S. Department of the Treasury issues regulations that narrow the application of this provision to a smaller subset of our research and development expenses or the provision is deferred, modified, or repealed by Congress, it could harm our future operating results by effectively increasing our future tax obligations. The actual impact of this provision will depend on multiple factors, including the amount of research and development expenses we will incur, whether we achieve sufficient income to fully utilize such deductions and whether we conduct our research and development activities inside or outside the U.S.
In 2021, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development announced an Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting including Pillar Two Model Rules defining the global minimum tax, which calls for the taxation of large multinational corporations at a minimum rate of 15%. Subsequently multiple sets of administrative guidance have been issued. Many non-US tax jurisdictions have either recently enacted legislation to adopt certain components of the Pillar Two Model Rules beginning in 2024 (including the European Union Member States) with the adoption of additional components in later years or announced their plans to enact legislation in future years. We performed an initial assessment of the potential impact from the Pillar Two rules to our income taxes and determined that there is no impact to us as it is below the global revenue threshold.
We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, import and export controls, financial and economic sanctions and similar laws, and non-compliance with such laws can subject us to administrative, civil and criminal fines and penalties, collateral consequences, remedial measures and legal expenses, all of which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation.
We are subject to anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, import and export controls, financial and economic sanctions and similar laws and regulations in various jurisdictions in which we conduct or in the future may conduct activities, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 and other anti-corruption laws and regulations. The FCPA and the U.K. Bribery Act 2010 prohibit us and our officers, directors, employees and business partners acting on our behalf, including agents, from directly or indirectly corruptly offering, promising, authorizing or providing anything of value to foreign government officials for the purposes of influencing official decisions or obtaining or retaining business or otherwise obtaining favorable treatment. The FCPA also requires companies to make and keep books, records and accounts that accurately reflect transactions and dispositions of assets and to maintain a system of adequate internal accounting controls. The U.K. Bribery Act also prohibits non-governmental “commercial” bribery and soliciting or accepting bribes. A violation of anti-corruption laws or regulations could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation. Our policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance with these regulations may not be sufficient and our directors, officers, employees, representatives, consultants, agents and business partners could engage in improper conduct for which we may be held responsible.
We are also subject to import and export control laws and regulations, including the U.S. Export Administration Regulations, U.S. Customs regulations, and various economic and trade sanctions regulations administered by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control, and similar laws in other jurisdictions in which we conduct business. Exports of our products must be made in compliance with these laws and regulations. In addition, these laws may restrict or prohibit altogether the provision or supply of certain of our products to certain governments, persons, entities, countries, and territories, including those that are the target of comprehensive sanctions, unless there are license exceptions that apply or specific licenses are obtained. Any changes in import, export control, or sanctions laws and regulations, shift in the enforcement or scope of existing laws and regulations, or change in the countries, governments, persons, or technologies targeted by such laws and regulations, could result in decreased ability to export our products internationally.
Significant increases in import and excise duties or other taxes on, as well as any tariffs, particularly on our products to China, could materially increase our costs of our products and have an adverse effect on our business, liquidity, financial condition, and/or results of operations.
Non-compliance with anti-corruption, anti-bribery, anti-money laundering, import and export control, or financial and economic sanctions laws could subject us to whistleblower complaints, adverse media coverage, investigations, and severe administrative, civil and criminal sanctions, collateral consequences, remedial measures and legal expenses, all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and reputation.
Our insurance coverage may not be adequate to protect us from all business risks.
We may be subject, in the ordinary course of business, to losses resulting from products liability, accidents, acts of God and other claims against us, for which we may have no insurance coverage. As a general matter, the policies that we do have may include significant deductibles or self-insured retentions, and we cannot be certain that our insurance coverage will be sufficient to cover all future losses or claims against us. A loss that is uninsured or which exceeds policy limits may require us to pay substantial amounts, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.